Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So what does the Public Option support of 45+ Senators mean NOW?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 12:57 AM
Original message
So what does the Public Option support of 45+ Senators mean NOW?
Was it a meaningless gesture to allow the House to take the fall for not providing a PO or was it an attempt to have it both ways supporting the Public Option after voting to eliminate it?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. 15 more and we are ready to go!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. What does it matter?
Either you get it or you dont want to. At this point...what does it matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Why shouldn't it matter? Or does nothing matter at all?
I would like to know the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Well, what will be will be, and what people don't care about they wont care about
So, let it be, I guess. Maybe I just had an epiphany
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Dude... regroup :)
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Sometimes I think: "In a democracy, people get...."
You know the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. For the moment, nothing...
...but this is the beginning, not the end, for HCR (and the public option and/or Medicare buy-in) in the U.S.

Public-option advocates would be wise to start laying the groundwork for a future real public option proposal tied to Medicare rates. Not to be introduced now, or during this Congress, but during the interim between the time the full law kicks in four years from now and the mandated penalties take full effect a couple of years later. When people see the price tag for mandated coverage, they're going to demand relief -- and the Democrats will be well-placed to pull a Col. Dreyfuss and declare themselves "shocked...shocked" that the insurance companies didn't bring rates down on their own ;-) , and then pass a robust public option and/or Medicare buy-in via reconciliation -- something the passage of the current bill makes much easier in the future.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shotten99 Donating Member (478 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think so, too.
If this doesn't pass, the window of opportunity will close for another good 12-20 years.
After this, it's not going away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. Let's take a look at the reality of that
In 12 years the insurance companies will have lost 11 million customers a year for 11 years. You really think they'll wait to do any reforms. This was done now as a preemptive bailout before the public realizes they need a bailout. We would have had much more leverage in our negotiations if the public had seen this. And, very quickly, it would have become apparent. The unemployment rate has hit them with larger losses than they anticipated. They've been gearing up to manipulate things before the baby boomers began to escape but they did not anticipate the collapse of the economy and big losses of customers in the 3 years ahead of that beginning. That's why you're seeing the huge premium increases right now.

I guess in poker a good bluffer can clean up. That's what happened here. They needed this bill a lot worse than we did. And they managed to get us begging for their crumbs....again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. Can't anybody do whip counts any more?
That is the BEGINNING of the agitation for the next step.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. I can
Best we could tell we had 58 votes for the Medicare expansion that Lieberman helped kill. Before that there were somewhere between 53 and 56 for the public option with the state opt out. I'm pretty sure those votes for a PO have gone nowhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. If they're smart, they'll start soon on a "Medicare option I can buy into" bill
based on what Alan Grayson is proposing. Make it voluntary. Then watch the fun as the majority of Americans run to a socialized medical program. Watch more fun as the teabaggers hang in there with their conviction that private health care is the answer...as their premiums escalate relentlessly to cover the evaporating pool.

Now, if I were Grayson, I'd add a penalty clause that requires latecomers to pay a higher fee to join at a later date. Because there ought to be a cost to those who won't join initially to make the program the most cost effective it could be for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. It means we god damn well hold them to it.
And when we get 50, they pass a damn bill, tell the Repukes and the traitors to fuck themselves, bring in Biden for the tiebreaker if needed, and get some REAL reform done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. The Insurance Industry got their wish: the Public Option/ Single-Payer are both DOA
for the foreseeable future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
11. Hard to say. If they did have the votes, Pelosi truly did take one for the team
or she was correct and they didn't have them. Bottom line is we need to not let this fade with passage of the bill. I hope Grayson, Kucinich, et al are going to be pushing. Reid has said he will try to get a vote on a PO under reconciliation in the Senate in the next couple of months. I'll keep calling and writing him. May come to nothing but I'll still give it my best efforts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
12. K & R
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
15. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
16. K & R. This is day one of the new fight for HCR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
19. The House removed the PO from the Bill because there was no way it would pass in the Senate.
45+ senators isn't enough. You need 50 + the V.P.

They simply didn't have the votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. THe WH didn't WANT them to have the votes and that is a fact.
Edited on Tue Mar-23-10 07:34 PM by saracat
Several elected officials have admitted that.The WH is NOT want a PO. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. As I recall, Pelosi declared the PO dead the same day Reid said he had the votes.
Edited on Tue Mar-23-10 07:49 PM by Edweird
In other words, THEY HAD THE FUCKING VOTES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC