Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Taliban Arrests Had 'Negative Impact': Afghan Official

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 09:26 AM
Original message
Taliban Arrests Had 'Negative Impact': Afghan Official
Source: Sify news/AFP

The arrest of Taliban leaders has had a "negative impact" on peace talks between the Afghan government and the insurgents, a spokesman for President Hamid Karzai said Saturday.

The recent arrests in Pakistan of the Taliban's second-in-command, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, and others in the Islamists' hierarchy, slowed down Afghan government initiatives to broker peace, Siamak Hirawi told AFP.


"We confirm the negative impact of the arrests on the peace process that the Afghan government has initiated," said Hirawi, Karzai's deputy spokesman.

His was the first official confirmation from the Kabul government that there had been contact with the Taliban, with the intention of discussing an end to the insurgency now in its ninth year.

He also confirmed that the former UN envoy to Afghanistan, Kai Eide, had held peace talks with Taliban figures and said Eide had kept the Afghan government informed of his actions.

more: http://sify.com/news/taliban-arrests-had-negative-impact-afghan-official-news-international-kdusubeacjj.html

_________________________________________________________________

Eide and now Karzai's spokesperson have confirmed there were 'talks about talks' and the arrests had a negative impact on that process. I still am curious, did the US request the arrests of Pakistan? I surely do not believe that Pakistan would arrest Afghan Taliban without the US requesting that they do so.

Was this a case of the US trying to disrupt any possible peace process before it gets off the ground?

Or, was it Washington acting against the efforts of the UN and Afghanistan to produce some PR gains?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. US "extremely gratified" by Pak arrest of Baradar: Holbrooke
At a press briefing on the upcoming Strategic Dialogue between the Untied States and Pakistan, Richard Holbrooke, Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, said the U.S. was “extremely gratified that the Pakistani Government has apprehended the number-two person in the Taliban.”

His reaction comes shortly on the back of revelations by former UN staff that secret negotiations with the Taliban for greater peace in Afghanistan might have slowed down due to the arrest of Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, Afghan Taliban’s number two commander.
Mr. Holbrooke said many other militants and groups have been picked up or eliminated, and this is increasing the pressure on the Taliban; he added that this was “a good thing for the simplest of reasons: It is good for the military efforts that are underway in Afghanistan.

Mr. Holbrooke was asked about the revelation by former UN Representative in Afghanistan Kai Eide that he was in talks with senior Taliban leaders since last spring and that those talks were shut down after the Pakistani authorities began arresting senior Afghan Taliban leaders like Baradar.

Reacting to the question about revelations by former UN Representative in Afghanistan Kai Eide that he was in talks with senior Taliban leaders since last spring and that those talks were shut down after the Pakistan arrested Baradar, he said, the arrest “is not related to the issue that you’re addressing.” President Karzai has said he wanted a reconciliation program with all Afghans, including people fighting with the Taliban and President Obama has said we support Afghan-led reconciliation, Mr. Holbrooke said.

http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/Politics/20-Mar-2010/Dialogue-with-Pak-not-at-Indias-expense-Holbrooke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. the Afghan government thinks the arrests were a deliberate attempt
Edited on Sat Mar-20-10 09:38 AM by bigtree
. . . to stifle the cooperation by the arrested figures who had been reportedly cooperating in back-channel talks. Interesting how the Karzai regime has invested so much effort in trying to forge a peace agreement with the Taliban. Any peace effort is sure to rankle those who favor a bit more killing (on all sides) before they call it quits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC