Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Orders Polygraphs From Teen Rape Victims

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:36 AM
Original message
Judge Orders Polygraphs From Teen Rape Victims
Edited on Fri Mar-19-10 11:50 AM by The Straight Story

Judge Orders Polygraphs From Teen Rape Victims


CLEVELAND—An Ohio judge has upset four teenage sex-assault victims by ordering the girls to take polygraph tests after she convicted the boys accused in the cases.

The girls and their parents say the order by Cuyahoga Juvenile Court Judge Alison Floyd questions the victims’ honesty.

None of girls has complied.

The Plain Dealer newspaper says the judge’s intent is unclear and she hasn’t responded to requests for comment. A message for comment was left Friday at her office by The Associated Press.

The judge also ordered the teenage boys accused of rape and other sex crimes in the cases to undergo polygraph tests as part of an assessment before sentencing. Floyd found them delinquent, the juvenile court equivalent of guilty.

http://www2.nbc4i.com/cmh/news/state_regional/article/judge_orders_polygraphs_from_teen_rape_victims/33692/

Also - more extensive info here:
http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2010/03/juvenile_court_judge_alison_fl.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Forcing the victims to get a polygraph is like raping them all over again.
Why didn't the judge just order a live reenactment of the crime?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. lol
You forgot the sarcasm sticker. Or, do we have one for gross exaggeration?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. I keep hoping that people will recognize sarcasm when they see it.
That is probably a vain hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ceile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't understand
The boys have already been found guily. What could this possibly accomplish except to further traumatize the victims?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. More info on it here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Polygraph tests are worthless
I sure hope someone steps in here and tells this judge he is nuts.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. The judge is a She
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. After the conviction?
That's insane..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. Just to be sure!
:crazy:

Dark days, my friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Does the judge have the right to make such an order?
I thought polygraphs were not admissible in court.

Is the judge incompetent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. interesting precedent
Edited on Fri Mar-19-10 11:44 AM by Fresh_Start
why not have everyone involved in a trial including the judge, attorneys, witnesses and defendent all need to pass polygraphs.
Why do I think the judge would believe they are above the need to prove their veracity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. That would be like giving Congress drug and alcohol tests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. error
Edited on Fri Mar-19-10 11:46 AM by Cronus Protagonist
There was an error during the posting of this item.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. Polygraphs are phony science.
They don't work and they aren't based on science. No polygraph "test" has been proven in peer-reviewed scientific studies to work better than chance under field conditions. What this really shows is what a joke the juvenile justice system is in this country. Not only do Defendants have almost no rights, but judges think they can essentially do what they want, and they often do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. CIA spy Aldrich H. Ames passed plenty of them all the while working for the USSR
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldrich_Ames

Aldrich Hazen Ames (born May 26, 1941) is a former Central Intelligence Agency counter-intelligence officer and analyst, who, in 1994, was convicted of spying for the Soviet Union and later Russia.

In 1986 and again in 1991, Ames passed two polygraph screening examinations while spying for the Soviet Union and Russia, respectively. Ames was initially "terrified" at the prospect of taking the test, but had received advice from the KGB on how to pass it. Critics claim that the CIA's over-reliance on the device is harmful to national security.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. The judge has no legal standing to order the accused let alone the victim of a crime
to take a polygraph. Results are inadmissible in court except in rare circumstances where both sides agree in advance to allow the results to be admitted. Even then, you'd have to be a fool to agree to that because the results are notoriously unreliable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Juvenile Court is not "court"
The rules of evidence to not apply in juvenile adjudications in most, if not all jurisdictions. There is no right to a jury trial, and very limited rights in general. Hearsay, unfounded opinion testimony from social workers and things like polygraphs are used in juvenile courts all the time. The way they get by with it is that a person is not "convicted" in juvenile court, although the juvenile detention center that most who are adjudicated are sent to feels very much like a prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Thanks, just noticed that this was juvenile court..
I didn't realize they allowed polygraphs in juvenile court. That is outrageous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joycean Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
13. Does the judge have a guilty conscience?
Edited on Fri Mar-19-10 11:56 AM by joycean
Or something? Because a polygraph isn't going to assuage it. They are as useless as a three dollar bill. Especially for rape victims, who tend to set off the 'lying' sensors because they are emotionally distraught. Because they are talking about when they were raped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. She answered the polygraph questions through broken teeth and swollen eyes...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. The judge has an interesting history on the bench
...I wonder what she's up to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-19-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. Many of the comments following the article cheering on the judge's decision
are disturbing, to say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC