Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Legal minds weigh in: Can our textbooks lie to our students legally?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 02:25 PM
Original message
Legal minds weigh in: Can our textbooks lie to our students legally?
If a public education history book says that Reagan championed small government, that would be a blatant lie.

Reagan created the largest government of any President in US history. Reagan increased federal government spending to the highest levels in US history.

We know this here at DU so I'm not going on a long anti ray-gun rant.

The question is..

Can our public education's history books blatantly lie to our students, legally?

Are there any legal challenges to the recent Texas Board of Education's decision to rewrite history?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Technically, it's not a lie that he championed small government.
However, his actions were completely at odds with what he said.

The lie is not is saying he championed small government, but in NOT saying that he expanded it while exploding the national debt.

So far as I know it's not illegal, but it sure as shit is unethical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. History is interpreted different ways, depending on the bias of the writer...
Hell, I read that some new textbooks are removing Thomas Jefferson from the list as important thinkers in our Nations history. Would you say that is accurate?

In the early 60's I had a history book that told the story of how George Washington chopped down the cherry tree. Even in Blackwell, Oklahoma in 1962 people knew that story was, well, untrue.

Yes, they can lie. There is no repricussion unless school systems refuse to buy the historical fiction they write.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. History is also interpreted different ways, depending on the lies of the writer.
The TEA, however, has gone far beyond simple interpretation of history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. You know the Little Rotten Johnny George Washington joke, correct?
Little Rotten Johnny was on his grandpa's farm when he saw the outhouse next to the cliff. Little Rotten Johnny being who he is, he pushed it over the edge.

About an hour later, his dad called him in. "Johnny, did you push the outhouse over the cliff?"

'No, father, I didn't push the outhouse over the cliff.'

"Son, have you ever heard the story of George Washington and the cherry tree? One day George Washington decided to test his new axe by chopping down the cherry tree. When his father asked if he'd done it, George Washington said 'I cannot tell a lie. I did it.' And he didn't get in trouble for it at all. So, Johnny, did you push the outhouse over the cliff?'

'Father, I cannot tell a lie. I did it.'

LRJ's father beat him to within an inch of his life.

'But you said George Washington didn't get in any trouble!'

"George Washington's father wasn't sitting in the cherry tree when George cut it down."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. With history it is hard to avoid veering into opinion
The history book might get awfully dull if it just listed what Reagan signed.

But a good textbook should at least indicate where the debates were instead of just supporting one side.

It is the students of Texas who would suffer from this.

I don't know if there is any law on the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. The do, therefore they can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC