Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The New National Broadband Plan - Test/Report Your Dead Zone

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 12:05 AM
Original message
The New National Broadband Plan - Test/Report Your Dead Zone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Former FCC Chair Hundt says decision to favor Internet over TV was made in '94
Edited on Thu Mar-18-10 12:26 AM by Dover
Former FCC Chair Hundt says decision to favor Internet over TV was made in '94


In a speech that he described as "confession or admission," former FCC Chair Reed Hundt yesterday told a Columbia University audience that his decision to favor broadband over broadcast goes back to 1994, and that the March 17 National Broadband Plan "will reflect ... the end of the era of trying to maintain over-the-air broadcast as the common medium and the beginning of a very detailed, quite substantive, commitment to having broadband, the son of narrowband, be the common medium,"according to TV News Check. He also said the plan "will have in it a specific pathway to shrinking the amount of spectrum that broadcast will be able to use. In all previous eras, the government has expanded the spectrum for broadcast so as to give it a chance to thrive as it moved from analog to digital. Now, it's going to be moving in reverse." He added that he found it "simply astonishing" that the feds assisted broadcasters through the digital transition last year by subsidizing converter boxes for viewers. "Those people would have been much better off getting a voucher for broadband Internet subscriptions." Watch his entire hourlong speech here.

http://www2.gsb.columbia.edu/flash/CBSPlay-append.html?video1=centers/CITI/lunch-speaker_3-11-2010.flv


Broadcasters may have to pay mandatory fees for keeping their spectrum

Broadcasters who decline to turn over spectrum for an upcoming auction may face fees for their decision, according to Broadcasting & Cable. Citing an unnamed source who has seen the National Broadband Plan that will be presented to Congress this week, the fees would be another tactic used by the feds to encourage give back of spectrum for auction. The FCC is looking to shift 500 MHz from traditional broadcast to wireless use (Current, Feb. 8, 2010).



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. So we rural people are screwn no matter what
How about an initiative to build a nationwide fiber optic system that can carry internet, TV, and telephony. That would be more consistent then over the air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't know if I understand it all technically, but I assume digital means satellite only?..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. My understanding is that they want to take away
broadcast TV frequencies and sell that bandwidth to Internet providers. This after the broadcasters have invested large amounts of money to change over to HDTV on new frequencies. I'm assuming that the FCC is thinking that the High Speed internet will be broadcasted over the air using the frequencies that are currently used by TV stations. This would be a bit better then satellite internet which is speed and weather limited but the scheme would force everyone everywhere to go to satellite or cable for TV. I don't think that's fair.

My understanding is that 95% of people Britains have access to high speed internet without losing over the air TV- I guess we are just incapable of such things in poor ole America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. In other words they are privatizing as well as digitalizing? No more free t.v. ?
Edited on Thu Mar-18-10 12:48 PM by Dover
So what does that mean for people who bought HDTVs? Are they going to be usable with the new system?


Not sure what all this means for radio either.
For instance, I noticed that the University of Texas is looking to buy some of the last of the lower frequency radio stations in that state recently made available through the FCC or other agency (to all states). Their current radio station is noncommercial (sort of) and going digital (and is high frequency). They are NPR affiliates as well and broadcast many of their products. And I think NPR didn't like the governement sale of the low frequency noncommercial frequencies because they are committed to digital and have complained that the lower frequency channels will interfere with the other stations...which others say is bogus.
I'm told that digital radio and digital t.v. are completely different animals.
These are things I know or have heard, but I don't really understand how all the pieces fit together.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-10 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I guess we'll have see how it plays out-n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC