Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shattering: Kucinich to vote for the HC BILL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:14 PM
Original message
Shattering: Kucinich to vote for the HC BILL
Source: Daily Kos

Howard Fineman just reported the Congressman will have a press conference tommmorow where he will be announcing his support for the bill. Although it will be reluctant support, he WILL vote for the final bill. He also said he will emphasis, as Obama did, that this is just a first step in the reform effort.

The Dream lives on folks, let's keep up the fight!

Rec List!!: I just want to thank............... Congressman Dennis Kucinich, if he does in fact vote for this bill, it truly will be the right thing to do. The fight isn't close to over, this bill is imperfect, heck I could go on and on about what's wrong with it, but we will imporve it, every year, every chance we can, we will improve it. For my family, for your family, for all of our families, let's get the job done.



Read more: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/3/16/20943/0248



I heard Howard Fineman say this on Countdown tonight as well. D.K had announced he is holding a press conference tomorrow to announce his vote on health care. O'Donnell asked Fineman if D.K would call a press conference just to say "no" again; and Fineman said his sources say D.K. is holding the press conference to say he changed his mind and will be voting "yes" after all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. If he is, then he got what he wanted...either a strong PO or...
an agreement to let the States adopt single payer on their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. He got single payer? No - I hope he got something but I think he got nothing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CLANG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. You're right - he got nothing but political cover
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
47. Actually, Fineman said D.K.'s yes vote would give Obama political cover with liberals.
(Just reporting.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. Not with this liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #52
121. Or this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #52
132. Or this one. I'm not buying the shoddy DLC propaganda. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #132
143. No more support for Dennis from me if he votes for the bill-you either stand up for your principles
or they are meaningless-threats or not. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #143
160. Careful! People are likely to remember your words and hold you to them.
You will no longer support DK if he votes yes on HCR?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #143
216. Dennis announced! Breaking! earthmom no longer supports DK! Principles are principles!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #143
236. To compromise on a bill doesnt mean you are compromising on your principles.
I dont like this bill and I am glad DK fought hard to get a better bill. But his principles are to get the best he can for the American public. Sometimes you must compromise to do that. What DK should do is vote for this bill, then turn around and introduce legislation to fix the bill. And keep up the pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #236
248. Agreed.
A) This bill could become law, and then be fixed over, say, the next 12 years; OR, B) the bill could be defeated, and then a new one could be crafted a whole lot closer to what Mr. Kucinich wants. However, scenario B could take 20 years or longer to even gain traction in Congress again. So which approach stands a better chance of moving things forward and getting Americans what they deserve sooner?

And no, we don't know what the future holds. But I agree that compromising on a bill is not the same as compromising on principles. Not taking the hill in a battle doesn't mean you give up all the ground you DID take. And, in a larger sense, losing a battle is not the same as losing a war.

--------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #132
155. +1, not buying DLC propaganda now, not ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #52
147. Me neither
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 11:35 PM by martymar64
I've amazed people with my ability to hold grudges.

I'm not forgiving or forgetting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #52
162. Not here either.
NO way, NO how.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #52
171. Me neither.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #52
203. Or this one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #52
237. Not me. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #47
64. LOL....In his dreams n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #47
66. Obama can guess again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #47
73. The so-called moderates don't get progressives at all, do they?
I assume that the whole concept of supporting a bill based on facts and reasoning must be foreign to the same people who assume cult to personality is the only possible MO to political estimation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #73
227. That really is the amusing thing
They want to believe or do anything to get our votes that doesn't involve changing policy or actually listening to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #73
238. What the hell do so-called moderate believe in?
Progressives believe in the Constitution, health care is a right, no domestic spying, no Patriot Act, no MCA, no torture, no rendition, etc.

The reich-wing believe in the opposite.

so what the hell do so-called moderates believe in?

I believe a lot of so-called moderates are republicans that are too embarrassed to admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #47
86. Not here either.
It must have been coerced. I'm disappointed that DK would agree to this but the pressure must have been enormous. I'm so saddened that he gave into such threats. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #86
95. Funny how liberals have to be coerced when they don't toe the line...
... yet the so-called "moderates" get all sorts of latitude. If only all the moderates in this site had put the same pressure on Obama et al to present a strong and robust legislation to reform health care, as they seem to be putting on Kucinich to subsume his position in order to grant a cheap political point to this administration... I am sure a much better outcome would have developed from this whole kabuki play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #95
102. It's always the liberals who must compromise.Still Dennis said he would support a filibuster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #102
105. I respect his right to vote against the bill but not to filibuster so others don't get to vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #105
107. Keep in mind that it's stupid to announce your intentions ALL the time in politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #107
108. Deals are made left and right that should not be mentioned or they can't be pulled off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #108
109. Oft times the mission is simply to get the opposition to let their guard down and
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #109
112. ...always be thinking several moves ahead. It's so hard to trust in politics though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #112
115. but knowing the "nature" of those involved certainly helps. I could never trust McCain/Palin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #115
117. I think Dennis trusts Obama more now since their secret talk.And I trust Dennis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #102
139. You cannot filibuster in the House of Representatives. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #102
142. All your posts in a row look like you are trying to hijack this thread. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #102
148. it's okay to put information in the *message* part of the post
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 11:37 PM by fishwax
Just FYI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #102
184. Filibuster in the House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #102
186. who cares if he supports a filibuster? He's not in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #95
249. Failure to reform
is not a better outcome. There was never any winning this by "fighting". I am surprised we got even this far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luciferous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #47
99. Yeah, good luck with that Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #47
103. There wasn't much he could do on his own, except for..
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 10:11 PM by mvd
hold out for changes, in which case DK would deserve even more credit IMO.

Here's how I see it. There are a lot of negatives about the bill:

- too many loopholes
- no public option
- not enough control on total out of pocket expenses
- entrenches insurance industry
- major improvements necessary for an adequate bill

Here are the positives about voting for the bill:

- length of the debate
- people with pre-existing conditions will now get some coverage
- the exchange allows for better transparency
- subsidies for low-income people
- I think we'd be in a better position for improvement with this bill rather than no bill. Public option is gaining momentum and won't go away.

The positives slightly outweigh the negatives
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #47
119. LOL. Riiiight.
Nope, sorry. We/I want a liberal in office. It has been one hell of a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #47
163. LOL-- he says that, does he?
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 12:07 AM by Marr
He peers into the liberal mind in much the same way that a doughnut doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #47
209. Not with me it doesn't. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #47
218. I love me some DK --
but O ain't getting SHIT from me on this issue. He signs a HIR bill that is essentially the one we are looking at and I am finding a new candidate to back in 2012. It's that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #47
239. Not me, or my family back in Ohio in his district, who will never vote
for him again. He's definitely no FDR. Not interested in any of his grievances anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
131. He isn't one of the ones who needed cover. He probably got a threat
and had better not get on any small aircraft. The insurance corps demand their blood money!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #131
141. I was thinking the exact same thing. Especially after Obama took Dennis up in his plane
to have a "private discussion about the problem". :wow:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7921433

I mean, seriously, it all reeks of some full on Hollywood movie where you can trust no one!

Come on DU, can't you see the criminal behavior that's happening in Washington DC right before your eyes?! :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #141
230. Yes, Obama should have flown coach like everyone else.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #131
172. Sadly, I thought the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
icee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #131
240. Yes. That may well have happened. Unfortunately, any positions
he takes on anything else are simply dust in the wind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #23
138. Well, he DID get a ride on Air Force One.
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 11:07 PM by MilesColtrane
And, some face time with the President.

Maybe he was just feeling taken-for-granted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #138
185. Doesn't seem as though D.K. would change his vote for a ride in Air Force One.
Or face time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warm regards Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #23
256. Damn, he had me fooled. I always thought that Kucinich was man of principle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I hope it's that the States can adopt a single payer on their own.
Apparently the Feds are too corrupt in the beltway to be able to do it, but I think if states adopt their versions of it, it will spread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. If that's what he got, I will take it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
40. Done. That's already in the Senate bill. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #40
56. Not until 2017. And even then, the federal government can refuse to let a state...
...which wants to go single-payer do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #56
62. The thing is, states can already set up single payer, and several are in the process.
Come 2017, they can get federal tax credits and subsidies for doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #40
87. Could that have been in danger of being "fixed?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. From what Fineman said, it seemed as though D. K. was convinced that it has to start somewhere--
which is what the cancer/lukemia victim Obama spoke about said to the cameras from her hospital bed yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. Yes, cancer always starts somewhere. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
49. Yep, on the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #49
179. The right would be the modern democratic party. I'm guessing you meant the far right though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #179
189. Hard to say, given the bogus way in which labels are used these days. Republicans
characterize Obama as hard left, which is ludicrously dishonest, yet a portion of their base--and ours--buys it (or pretends to).. Ditto for calling DINO's like Stupak and Nelson "moderate Democrats."

But, regardless of the labels along the continuum, cancer starts on the right and therefore spreads left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #189
221. Yes, and I'll go even further than that.
People talk about politics like this


LEFT |--------------------CENTER--------------------| RIGHT

As though on each poll you have something "fringe" and as you move toward the middle you get to "balance" or "reasonable" positions.

That's garbage. Here's what it actually looks like

JUSTICE <--------------------------------------------| RIGHT

If you want to stop somewhere in the middle of that line, call it "center" and set up camp fine. But its not the "center" of anything. It's you (generic you) being too big of a coward to keep moving toward greater social and economic justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
76. The irony of it all is that patient is alive because of drastic and aggressive treatment...
... had a similar milquetoast and timid MO to what Obama is proposing being applied to anyone suffering through leukemia, he or she would be dead not before long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
100. The Senate bill already allows states to initiate their own public option
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. With all due respect to Kucinich and Fineman
I'll believe it when I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm a Believer

R #5!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good. DK has finally come to his senses.
I thought he would eventually. He lost support from almost everyone except for a few hard core progressives on this site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Oh bullshit.....keep dreamin
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 08:26 PM by AnOhioan
He has alot more support then you realize....DU is not indicative of the country's mood regarding this bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. MSNBC SAYS- KUCINICH PRESS CONFERENCE A.M. TO ANNOUNCE HE WILL SWITCH VOTE TO YES.
Dont miss it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Read the first response to the OP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Thats fine. I hope its true, but regardless..
I am just relieved all good Democrats are now on board to pass this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. the only people I know who are for it
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 08:28 PM by Skittles
are completely deluded as to what it all actually means - they actually believe health insurace means actual access to health care
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Senator Sanders voted for it, though he says it needs improvement. Dr. Dean says the same.
It seems that people have been getting on the "It's better than nothing" bandwagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. doesn't make it right
just how much will it be improved when Dems lose Congress? It's crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #29
53. I didn't say their votes made it right. But, they are not confused about what the bill means
I was responding to your statement that the only people who are for the bill don't know what it means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. I said the only people I KNOW
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 09:22 PM by Skittles
I'm not stupid enough to trust any politician
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #57
106. Ah, got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:50 AM
Response to Reply #57
180. Exactly. People don't seem to get why just name-dropping politicians names doesn't mean shit to me.
But from my point of view, it boggles my mind that it means something to them. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #180
181. .
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 02:53 AM by Political Heretic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #180
191. It depends on the subject matter. In this case, D.K.'s vote actually means something, while
the opinion of the people whom I know and respect will neither pass the ball nor defeat it.

Besides, it's amazing how the opinion of those whose politics I respect almost always is nearly identical to my own. Massive coincidences, no doubt. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #57
193. honestly
that's not very clear from your prior post. People often shorten "know of" to "know" within that context. And how would we know you're "not stupid enough to trust any politician"?

:shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #29
228. Oh good point, once the Republicans take over they'll stop this $70 Billion dollar give
away of our money to the for-profit-insurers who get in between people and healthcare. Wait, I may be a republican.

Checking the actions of both parties this century - which one has done anything at all for the People? C'mon - we are a decade in to the 20's - which one has improved the lot of the People as a whole?

We must fire All of congress and get some people in there working for US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
253. And Dems will fall off the cliff if this bill fails
Every last Republican in the House and Senate is sworn to oppose this bill. No defectors. Sounds like a good selling point to me. The GOP must be very fearful that Democrats will ultimately get much in the way of credit, IF it was to pass. Why else would they oppose it to such an extent? Any so-called progressive that throws in with the unanimous Republican position needs to reconsider their political affiliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
154. If "better than nothing" is the best they can do with both Congress and the WH
then they really really suck at governing. They have simply enshrined a corrupt system that will further suck the American workers dry and leave them in permanently dire financial straits.

21st Century American adopting a Dickensian framework for economic policy is no way to run a country.

Fuck it, they are going to do whatever they want whether we like it or not. They think that they are entitled to our blind support simply because they are not Republicans.

Well, when they ask for my support come this November and in November 2012, my response will be:

"Sorry, the vote's just not there."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #154
183. You aren't alone.
I fully plan on making that clear in the State Convention here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
122. THANK YOU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. and he has a lot less support than you realize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Will Mitt Romney be there when they sign this thing? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
133. A-freaking-men. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. With DK, support from some internet political junkies had little to do with it.
He was holding out for something and I believe he got something for it. We will know tomorrow at his press conference. If he caved because he was whipped, it's sad. It doesn't change my support for him one bit. It does tell me how screwed this country is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. He got an amazing ride on a big shiny jet...
"He was holding out for something and I believe he got something for it."

Err, yeah, he got a ride on Air Force One and some face time with Obama. It is unlikely the President would have showered so much attention on Dennis if it wasn't already pre-arranged that Kucinich would change his vote to "yes" if Pelosi really needed him too. It is pretty clear now that Pelosi will in fact need every single vote, so she needed Dennis to switch. This is just how politics work - not just here in the US, but pretty much everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I think he's been in a big shiny jet before and a limo.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
59. Whiile LBJ was Senate Majority Leader, someone's vote must have surprised him.
Or maybe he had just miscalculated (unlikely). In any event, as the vote was being taken, LBJ pointed at a Senator who had already voted and yelled "Change your vote! I need your vote."

And the Senator complied.

When your vote is THE critical one.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howmad1 Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
37. Well, excuse me for being a "hard core progressive".
That, sir is an insult to just about most DU'ers. Believe me, this hard core progressive will NOT, let me repeat NOT vote for Obama in 2012 if we don't get a strong Public Option. Just remeber who got Obama elected in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. Actually I think the Independent vote was the most important factor in getting Obama elected.
Regardless, I think you are wrong if you decide not to vote for the Democratic nominee but thats your decision. Lets just hope there aren't enough like you to Naderize the election and cause another 4-8 years of GOP/Evil Empire rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #44
63. I think the Democratic vote helped him a bit, too. And he may not be the Democratic nominee.
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 09:36 PM by No Elephants
He may not even choose to run. Or he may run and be challenged successfully. Way too soon to dust off the crystal ball.

Reality is that neither Party's Presidential nominee can win without his or her base plus some Independents. So you can't say Independents elected Obama or liberals elected Obama. Both were necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #44
224. Don't blame it on Nader
This is Obama's baby. Decisions are not without consequences. Who got the independents out to vote? The hard core liberals who thought they were getting someone far more liberal than they got. We made him and we can break him. His Rahminator may be too retarded to understand that, but Obama is smart and savvy so he knows that we won't work for him anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is a good move. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Good for Dennis.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
61. +1
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zambero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
252. Since every last Repuke in Congress is against the bill...
then it certainly must have some merit. Dennis is doing the right thing here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. It's the right thing to do and they must have reassured him of the PO.
k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bleacher Creature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
20. So it's basically Jane Hamsher and the teabaggers who are opposed. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
104. And Michael Moore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #104
158. And he's right. Unfortunately, he has no vote in the House
He has no representation by Congress any more than I or millions of us do. The Democratic Party has sold out working people and gave them this POS bill with not one Republican vote. It is not bipartisan. Every vote to enshrine private insurance and force it on everyone under penalty of law was crafted entirely by Democrats. Not one single Republican vote.

This is a fact that I will repeat until November.

Liberals will not forget this betrayal. Try getting elected in November 2010 and 2012 without us. What are you going to do? Get Republicans to vote for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #20
190. Why would anyone post something that patently untrue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #190
210. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #20
229. Perhaps we should just let you opine, your counting skills seem to be of the low sort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
25. He GOT IT!
Thank you Dennis. What he got is the realization that passing this bill means that it is STEP ONE. It is something that can be and SHOULD BE improved upon.

A bill not passed cannot be improved.

Make no mistake about it. Failure to pass this bill, no matter how distasteful portions of it are, would mean that both Obama and any inkling of ANY health care/insurance reform would be gone for at least a decade if not longer. In fact, I'd be surprised to live long enough and I'm ONLY 55.

My respect for this man has just gone up ten fold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
135. You mean threats? Yeah, I'm sure he got those
your insurance pals are very powerful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #135
225. proof? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #25
159. They won't pass any "fixes". Not in this decade.
Over the next year, the WH will do everything in its power to squelch any talk or media coverage about fixing this POS bill. They're just stroking you right now, trying to lull you into compliance.

They want to "move forward" and not talk about health care. It will be amazingly swift how fast they will act to change the subject to anything but helath care. Just watch and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #159
192. Please, don't ruin everything by trying to hand out reality checks. Not accepted here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
27. My faith has been restored in Dennis. Good man.
This is the best bill we have ... it stinks, but it is something to build on. Due to the nature of lobbying it is near impossible to make big changes to the system anymore.

The next reform item on the list should be lobbying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #27
161. The next issue should be immediately fixing this POS bill. Don't try to change the subject.
Let's fix this first then talk about these other things, like lobbying. I know they are important, but we need to get this one right first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #161
205. Lobbying and fixing this bill are closely related.
Do you think the Dem's came up with this bill just for the fun of it? Look at the Financial regulation bill, that too is pretty weak.

The Dem's agenda is very much against the status quo. But against them is every single republican, the lobbyists who have more than enough finical power to pick off just enough Dem's to block most legislation or water it down. Under the current circumstances no good bills will get through.

imo, Lobbying should be the next target.

and btw, there is no way they are going near healthcare reform for a few more years after they pass this bill. They have used up too much political capital trying to get this through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
28. The "Man of Principle" Caves to Common Sense

Good for him.

Maybe he isn't a nimrod after all.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. I don't think common sense means what you want it to mean...
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 08:57 PM by liberation
... starting a negotiation by asking far less than what you want/need, in hopes you can somehow make up ground from such a compromised start which you did not have to put yourself in to begin with... that is many things. But "common sense" ain't one of them.


That being said, I am now of the firm belief that there is a great business opportunity to be made, by selling primo ocean front real estate in Arizone to the legion of dupes that make up the Dem party nowadays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. I'm sorry you feel that way.

But, then again, you know where the door is.









Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #39
65. No problem...
I already took the door.

I was simply pointing out that subsuming the people's interests, during the only real chance for an actual reform of our insane health care system (in at least one generation or more), in order to make a cheap political point... "common sense" it is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #39
80. With all due respect, who are you to show anyone the door to the Democratic Party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #80
128. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #128
194. You saw style? ;-) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #39
211. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #28
72. Where the fuck are this guy's avid supporters now?
Not a lot of traffic in this thread. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #72
231. Let's all revel in the coercion of a man of principle. Yay, the unprincipled side wins
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 03:51 PM by pundaint
OK, what, exactly was won? What will hold the prices down. Who will pay for the 10 million left out people? Out of whose pockets will be paid the additional cut to the insurance companies when we also pay for health care for the poor? Will insurers be able to buy hospital corporations and raise rates there?

Yup this is quite a win for the corporate side.

I loved Kucinich's stand and I mourn this switch.

I am surprised, but I continue to understand the overwhelming negative aspects of this bill, and continue to oppose it and those elected officials who vote for it. Now, Kucinich among them.

People: We will continue to get as little as we will accept. Do not revel in selling US cheaply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waronbanks Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
30. I applaud DK for at least trying to make a stand
The corporates will always win. They got the media and most of the government on the payroll. We'll keep being forced to fork over our hard earned money to the criminals as long they have control. Just another day in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #30
164. When people refuse to buy under the mandate
It'll be up to all people that object to the mandate to serve on juries and acquit all people charged under this new unjust law. The mandate will need to be immediately challenged and sent to the Supreme Court.Because every American will now be taxed for the simple fact that they are alive, this could constitute a taking, which if I recall, is not allowed. Any legal eagles care to explain these issues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
31. Romney Care 2.0. Mitt Romney, the man who made America great again. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Wrong spot. nt
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 08:53 PM by WriteDown
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #33
195. Why, yes,, but I never thought I'd see you admit it! ;-) .
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 07:49 AM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
32. wow...he's voting for the mandated private insurance plan? Horrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. That way we can assure that everyone will have healthcare...or else. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulka38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
35. Washington DC - what a pit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
38. If Kucinich is caving, and he is not getting a PO to show for it...
... then I have lost all faith on the Dem party.

Having to witness the spectacle of seeing supposedly Dems not only propose, but defend to tooth and nail, a set of policies that not even saint Reagan would have dared shovel down our throats has just left me rather convinced that there is no point in giving two shits anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #38
91. +1
If Kucinich caves to this coercion, it's the death knell of our party.

Is there ANY liberal with a f**king spine who will stand up for the people before the love of his JOB?!? :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
41. Good! We set his butt on fire!
and a press conference? Why? Kucinich is a nobody in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #41
212. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
42. I was wrong about Kucinich. He is, after all, a man of principal.
He is showing he has principals by voting for a progressive bill that will help people. It is not perfect but it is real progress on the road to someting better.

Congressman Kucinich, my hat is off to you.

I appologize for my harsh criticism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #42
71. Do pray tell what is so "progressive" about this bill...
... or are moderate conservatives not content with having jumped ship from the GOP once the conservative brand was damaged beyond repair, that now they feel entitled to take over the "progressive" label while completely undermining the ethos behind it?

As a "progressive" health care reform in the US, this bill makes a great reactionary corporate giveaway elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #71
81. It will help moe than 30 million who do not have health care.
It gets rid of the pre-existing condtion.
Immediate Insurance Reform Benefits
Access to Affordable Coverage for the Uninsured with Pre-existing Conditions

•The President's proposal will provide $5 billion in immediate federal support for a new program to provide affordable coverage to uninsured Americans with pre-existing conditions. This provision is effective 90 days after enactment, and coverage under this program will continue until new Exchanges are operational in 2014.

There is a 90 day delay only for people who have a pre-existing condition. Also, for the poor whose income us up to 133% of the poverty line, they have Medicaid, which can not deny to cover pre-existing conditions. Children who are on their parents health plans (up to age 27) can not be shut out for pre-existing conditions.

Ending pre-existing condition exemptions will phase in over time, but these people will have coverage if they are refused, begining 90 days from signature of the bill.

And has many good provisons that help real people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #81
85. Again, what is so "progressive" about this bill?
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 10:01 PM by liberation
You are confusing moderate-conservative with "progressive"

Truly a testament to how much to the right this country has shifted. Here is a hint: any bill which not only enables private insurance carriers as the only providers of health care for the majority of the population, but actually forces people to purchase policies with these private companies, it is not "progressive." No matter how many federal subsidies are being funneled to private insurance carriers.

Here is a hint: single-payer or universal socialized healthcare = progressive. Just putting a couple of patches on a fairly inhumane system = moderate. In fact, using the federal government to force people to purchase a good which amounts to a natural monopoly which is not regulated by the government = reactionary/regressive.


As long as the delivery of health care to the majority of Americans is based around a for-profit system, there is absolutely nothing "progressive" about this POS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #85
94. MANDATES to bleed out the rest of our savings to the Insurance Cartel and Big Pharma. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #85
97. +1
Feed the corporations. Pukes and Dems in their pockets.

Not taking care of the taxpayer. Giving the teabaggers a leg to stand on when the PO would be so much less expensive to administer.

Forcing coverage. Orwellian.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #85
110. Agree; the bill isn't even close to adequate
Still, I'm not sure what else there is to do. The progressives now need to stand up as a group in the reconciliation; I think they have gotten too used to being taken for granted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #110
214. Why should progressives put their stamp on something so regressive in the first
place? So they can be tainted by the stench of this stinker when the shit hits the fan and the sheeple finally realize that they've been had when they're scraping up money to pay for insurance that they can't use because of the deductibles and they STILL have to choose between medicine and food or rent?

Let the blue dogs lie in this crap since they put there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #81
173. Demanding 30M people purchase insurance is not 'providing' health care
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #42
123. You accused him of wanting to kill 45, 000 Americans.
To respect only opinions that agree with yours, is not respect.

I do not know why, if it is true, he changed his mind, but he is a person of principle and fought hard to get what is needed for the people of this country. Kucinich has a right to vote whatever way he wants to, but absent something we don't know already, it doesn't change my mind.

Obama supporters have turned me off this president, even though I supported him in the last election. But anyone who attracts the kind of people I've seen on this board supporting this bill, cannot be the person I thought he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #42
165. Road to something better? When? In 2020?
Quit pretending that they are going to do jack-shit to fix this abortion of a bill.
What you see is what you get. It's not going to get any better. Congress and the WH has sold us out and the deal is done.

That's OK. I've come to terms that they are cheating fucks that are whores to Big Business. I'll also remember that in November of 2010, 2012, 2014,2016 and beyond.

That was their last chance and they blew it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #42
213. You seem to be confused about the definition of the word "progressive."
There's not a damn thing in this mandate to be raped by the insurance companies that's progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
43. Great, we really need his vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #43
235. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
dsharp88 Donating Member (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
45. You can't cross the finish line if you don't cross the starting line.
This is just the start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
46. Dennis got to put forward his Afghanistan resolution for a vote.
I think that was the trade for his support. Having Obama go out to his district might have been part B of the deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #46
96. That was IMO a shitty deal.
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 10:07 PM by ShortnFiery
Hard to believe that was Kucinich's 30 pieces of silver. Oh, he got a ride on AF One. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #96
187. yes, yes, sweetie. Kucinich is really Judas and you're really Jesus
singing plaintively from your cross.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orbitalman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
48. Dennis held out to the last minute...make no mistake >>>
He is a true patriot sticking to his guns, but he is also a HUMANITARIAN. There is the 'principle' of absolutely holding out for what you believe would be best AND the 'principle' of not letting people die before their time. Anyone regretting Dennis' vote change already HAS insurance, they just don't like the inurance they have for whatever reason and look to the public option or single-payer to save themselves and/or those they know. That is also where I am at; but we must also get started and use that start as a building block. Thank you Dennis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidthegnome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #48
144. Not really
Just have to point out that I don't have insurance (I'm also unemployed) - and until he gives a good reason as to why he has decided to change his vote, I do and will continue to regret his decision. I have always admired Kucinich as one of the few who stands up for his principles, even when it puts him in a very unpopular position. I don't understand why he changed his mind, but I hope it was for a good reason. I have to respectfully disagree with you in regards to principle. Primarily because I do not believe this reform will truly save lives. Perhaps I am mistaken - time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #48
152. I don't have insurance, and I regret his vote, unless he got
something for it. But I respect him no matter what. He was betrayed by his party as we were and he was viciously and shamefully attacked by people who claim to be Democrats for attempting to move this party away from the corporate interests that have engulfed it.

His stand revealed a lot about a lot of people I used to think of democrats, none of it good.

I respect whatever decision he makes because he is about the only member of Congress whose judgement I trust. But his 'yes' vote, if that's what he decides to do, will not change my mind about this bill. It is a corporate giveaway and will probably be the cause of a Republican majority in November. That is unforgivable of the leadership of this party to allow after the work so many did to put them in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
50. Oh noes!!! How will our conservative posters attack him next???
:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #50
74. If he didn't vote with fucking republicans, he would not be crticized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #74
79. You really want to play the "voting with the republicans" game?
Talk about living in a glass house while throwing stones all over the place.

Should I remind you about Obama's votes on the Patriot Act, FISA, War Funding, etc. etc?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #79
82. You won't survive in politics
without compromising. They didn't call Teddy the great deal maker for nothing. Looks like DK finally woke up from fantasy land. I wish others here would do the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #82
89. Yeah, who needs to have a point when you can simply take a tangential exit when you get stuck, eh?
Teddy also said that about speaking softly while carrying a big stick.

So where is the stick? Also TR was a Republican, I assume the example was a freudian slip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #89
98. I was talking about Ted Kennedy.
Speaking of big sticks:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=7932939&mesg_id=7932939

Looks like the president has started kicking ass. Fucking holdouts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #98
114. It's a pity he didn't try kicking ass when Baucus and others were scuttling any real reform
and selling us to the insurance companies. Of course, back then, we were being told the Obama respected the separation of powers and really couldn't twist any Congressional arms. It wasn't until the insurance scam he wanted all along was in danger that he decided to do something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #74
83. Thats a total misrepresentation. DK votes against the Corporatist DLC politics. The GOP
simply votes against the Democratic Party, in spite of the fact that DLC politics is actually quite similar/acceptable to the GOP. Sorry that you cannot differentiate the two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #74
196. Yes. Politicians without principles are better..
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 07:58 AM by No Elephants
Thank heaven more don't have the courage of their convictions, or we might have ended up with single payer instead of a health insurance corporate giveaway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #74
215. It's too fucking bad that people who claim to be Democrats are so fucking unprincipled. We might
actually have had a GOOD bill to vote on rather than this insurance company stroking piece of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #50
150. for flip flopping, of course
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #150
151. One admitted to me today in GD-P that they would keep ripping on DK no matter which way he voted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
51. Must have left Michael Moore heartbroken.
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 09:17 PM by neuvocat
The unions are coming down hard after the non-voting Dems on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
54. He must have gotten the Supreme Overlordship of the Earth
or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
55. nah....
....Dennis will hold firm against this bill....I have faith!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groundloop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
58. Let's get this done, then let's get to work on what needs to be improved / fixed
This bill isn't what I wanted, but if NOTHING would have come out of all this the R's would win big. Now let's keep pushing our congress critters to do the right thing and fix what's wrong in this bill.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #58
77. Thanks, no. I pushed for over a year on single payer or robust public option.
Wh, Senators and Rep. every damned week.

Most of that time, we had sixty Senators, the House and the Oval Office. I'm done pushing. All you folks who are convinced, against all evidence, that this bill will be improved soon, can push this go round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #58
137. If this scam is the best they could do with the majorities they have now,
how the hell are they going to "fix" it.

Face it, the fix has been in all along and we've been sold to the insurance companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #58
217. If you can't pass a good bil how the hell are you going to "improve" it?
You think that the Democrats will have more seats after passing this monstrosity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #58
233. A loss for the People so the Republicans wouldn't get a win! You got screwed, and you got screwed
and you got screwed and you got screwed. But the Republicans lost. That would put the People on the side of the Republicans in this issue - was that the goal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
60. Obama has no where to hide now.
He can't hide behind "well, we didn't exactly, to the letter, precisely say we favored PO" or "all the bad old congress people won't let me do it". His only push for this is that he is going to lead, not allow congress to push, the fight to improve the bill and hc in general. He hasn't got three years. He will need to be in the front leading. He will need to break his promise to the hospitals instead of his promise to the public.

We will know by summer if he is worth all the effort that put him in office. Now he can't plead ignorance or inexperience. He knows what he has to do. He will have to choose and fight for one or the other - the people or the corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #60
113. Meh. There's always "the perfect the enemy of the good" bullshit line.
"This is the political reality." Etc.

I don't have to tell you. Just read this board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #113
145. He's been hiding there for the last year.
We know where that hiding place is. I agree that the usual crowd will still find whatever he does to be a victory, but his only excuse from here on is is incompetence or complicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grassy Knoll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
67. Lets ask the experts ..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftFist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
68. Wow this thread is moving fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
69. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
70. Kucinich might consider this a first step and mean it
but it's become pretty clear that this is the bill Obama and the DLC dreamed of and, as far as he and Rahm are concerned, the issue is closed.

Remember, Obama did say he wanted to be the last president to deal with the issue - he's not going to admit he sold us to the insurance companies and that how we access health care still needs major changing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #70
93. Working Americans feeding the Insurance Cartel = Christians being thrown to the Lions.
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 10:04 PM by ShortnFiery
Dammit! Where have all our heros gone? :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #93
125. Know what a better analogy is? I posted it elsewhere, but...
Remember that incident that came out during the Jeffrey Dahmer trial, where that one kid got away from Dahmer and was running down the street, and he flagged down two passing cops? And the cops handed the kid back over to Dahmer? I couldn't think of any metaphor that sums up the way this Democratic Congress has handled this whole thing. The Democratic Congress are like those two cops, the people of this country are the naked kid running down the street in desperate need of help. You can guess which character the insurance cartels are.

They were elected in 2008 to rescue us, basically, and instead of protecting us from the insurance cartels, they've delivered us right over to them to be devoured instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #70
127. President Obama did no such thing
and all your posting otherwise is not going to change that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #127
134. He said in his big health "care" speech to Congress that he wanted to be the last president to deal
with the issue.

There's no way he's going to push for acutal reform was this scam becomes law - he made too many deals with pharma and the insurance companies to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #134
168. He won't let the PO be in any fix.
He's already cut a deal to kill the PO.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7930459


He has truly sold us out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #70
226. any proof of that closed claim? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
75. I support that. I also think it's a good sign that..
our leaders have bigger improvements in mind. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #75
219. Based on what? I haven't seen anything that one could construe as evidence
of any intention of them fixing anything. They're going to "move on" to the next thing. And why would bother THEY have access to better health care than those of us who pay their salary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barbara2423 Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
78. Good Move.
I thought the bill allows states to opt-in to single payer. Can someone confirm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #78
84. See Reply # 56.
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 09:54 PM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindandSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
88. Good for Kucinich! He put up a good fight but is a reasonable man who
knows that some progress is better than the status quo.
And with him on board. . .we will move toward a public option sooner rather than later. . .in the next few years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
90. Chamber of Commerce! Screw You!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lobodons Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
92. Thank you
Nobody got what they wanted at this time. But this is a start. Just think where we would be (perhaps single payer and also how many lives would have been saved) if we got something, just something back in 94. This is our something, just something this time.

Thanks DK!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luciferous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
101. I can't believe he caved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #101
136. rhambo threatened him
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 11:02 PM by Dinger
Bank on it. He wasn't the only one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
111. Why don't we all just wait and see what Dennis says in his press conference?
Maybe he will explain why he is switching to vote yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #111
124. What? And waste an opportunity to jump to conclusions?
There is only a small window between now and the press conference. Time's awasting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
116. I'm speechless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
118. Guess he is going to go under the bus now... LOL! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #118
129. Why would he go under the bus? Those who supported his
principled stand are not inclined to do what DLCers do to good Democrats. It won't change my mind, unless there is something we do not know yet. But he has a right to do what he thinks is best and he has never done anything without a good reason, contrary to the slanderous and egregious charges made against him, right here on this board.

I will not agree with his vote, but will always be grateful for what he tried to do in the face of such vicious and unprincipled attacks. And those attacks, more than this bill, have turned me and others off this president more than the difference of opinion.

Your snide comment now is one, although not the worst by any means, example of the behavior I'm talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #129
140. Ditto! Dennis K. is the Sir William Wallace ...also Jiminy Cricket
I posted this elsewhere..

Even Scottish Nobles betrayed Wallace for their own gains, bribed/paid by English nobles. Many of our democrats accept money from corportions, insurance companies & big pharma.

Many of our own Democrats in the Whitehouse are like Pinocchio. They keep changing stories. Broken promises. Lies. Even Obama promised the public option if I understand correctly. Dennis is there as their Jiminy Cricket. He is their conscience. He is there to remind them of their promises. He is there to stand for us The People. He doesn't want HCR Bill to pass without the public option. He would not have wanted this bill if it's really bad. I hope he has a good reason to vote aye.

here's a cute story of Jiminy Cricket

Jiminy may be small, but he's far from your average cricket. He can turn an umbrella into a parachute and looks great in a top hat and spats, and he carries a mean tune, as well as a nearly inexhaustible supply of home-brewed common sense. It's no wonder he is chosen by the Blue Fairy to be Pinocchio's "official" conscience. Unfortunately for Jiminy, it's only after he blushingly agrees to his appointment as "Lord High Keeper of the Knowledge of Right and Wrong, Counselor in Moments of Temptation, and Guide along the Straight and Narrow Path," that he realizes what a job he's gotten himself into. Like any conscience, Jiminy is occasionally late on the job, and frequently ignored even when he is around. Fortunately, Jiminy is nothing if not persistent, and he eventually succeeds in steering Pinocchio back to the right path.


What a shame that some people want to throw him under the bus. We need someone like that in Democratic Party. I wouldn't want the Democratic Party to be like the sheep without a lion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlingBlade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
120. Sounds like he got a public option then, We shall see.
Kucinich's Wednesday announcement could be defining moment for health reform
By Bob Cusack - 03/16/10 10:41 PM ET

After being lobbied by President Barack Obama, Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) is poised to announce his position on healthcare reform on Wednesday morning.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #120
126. if they did agree to one, they'll wait till after the vote, and then pull their
crossed fingers from behind their backs and wave them in Kucinich's face and say "syke!" There won't be any public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
130. Good Luck, everyone
with this HCR bill. I will see how it goes for you.

I have Medicare via SSDI. It works well for me. That's why I wanted it for everyone. Universal Health Care for all... Single Payer... a robust Public Option. I have a hard time understanding why it is so damn hard for democrats to get it done. A Single Payer/a strong Public Option is true Progressive.

I hope there will be a strong public option in this bill. If not now, fix it SOON!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
146. knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
149. Well, I hope that he got something.
He doesn't seem like that the type to cave in to a bill he's been opposing if he doesn't get what he wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
153. If Congress passes the Individual Mandate, the Democratic Party is literally doomed.
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 11:47 PM by New Dawn
The Democratic Party will get obliterated in the 2010 and 2012 elections, if they force that fascist Individual Mandate on working (and unemployed) America. And if Kucinich votes for that bill, his political career is over as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #153
166. "Yeah, but by God we'll have passed a bill!"
And 'twill be a cause for regret.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #166
169. Yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
156. Uh oh
Someone last night claimed they had "inside info from DK's office itself" that he was voting no.

I knew that was a bogus post, because delusionals claiming "inside knowledge" are a dime a dozen around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #156
197. Um, he said that himself publicly. If Fineman is correct, that would be a change of mind.
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 08:08 AM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #197
220. I am referring to after DK said 'no comment'
AFTER the "no comment", which was definitely the moment DK was switching his vote, a DUer claimed he "called DK's office" and got a confirmation and reassurance that he was voting 'no'.

That is what I meant by a bogus claim of inside knowledge. Someone claiming DK was still voting 'no' AFTER he was no longer publicly saying 'no'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
157. If he changed his mind, he's doing the right thing. The problem for him is that his
fact challenged hard sell against the bill was believed by those who believe in him. As such, his change of heart will surely disappoint those who believed his previous rhetoric.

Regardless, I hope he can bring his supporters around because this bill is a critical step forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #157
176. Only if there is a public option in it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #176
208. There has always been a state
by state version of the PO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #157
198. Some people actually think for themselves. And still find this bill shameful.
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 08:16 AM by No Elephants
Along with the way this entire issue was handled, from the primary right up until today. Cynical, deceptive, corrupt and shameful.

Yeah, yeah, I know. That's politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #198
207. That's because some buy into the talking points
promoted by former supporters like Dennis K. Unfortunately for him, he overplayed his hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
167. Boy! That must've been some plane ride... ;-)
I don't care why he's switching, I'll just be glad if he does...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #167
199. Yes, I'm sure a plane ride changed his mind.
When he was four.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #199
222. Well, apparently it did...
...they had a heart-to-heart talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
170. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
557188 Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
174. If true I am done with this party
If Kucinich sells us out the left is truly dead in this party.

I am gone, never to return to this party if Dennis sold me out. Simple as that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
175. Wonder what Obama threatened to do to his district?
Why fucking bother anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
177. If it's good enough for him, it's good enough for me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
subsuelo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #177
232. Yup. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #177
243. He doesn't think it is "good."
Just better than the alternative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
178. no one's going to improve it. if you can't pass it now, it's not going to be passed next year, or
the year after, or the year after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #178
200. Unicorn killer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
182. As I said days ago, I've tried to stay out of the worst of the DK-wars.
He can do what it wants. Doesn't change my opinion....

Senate Bill as is - does more long term harm for ordinary Americans than good.

House passes fixes first to turn into law on top of the Senate Bill - depending on the nature of those fixes, I could support that.

It just depends - we shall see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #182
202. Seems wise. These threads are getting like those whose subjects have their own forums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
188. If he sells his soul, I hope he gets a good price for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
201. Amazing how strong the views on this thread, given Kucinich has not said anything.
So far, he's either definitely a moral genius of the Democratic Party or definitely a demonic fool of the Republican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watercolors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
204. He just got all the poolitical headlines he craves!!
such a little player!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #204
234. This N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
206. Kabuki theater. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
223. The simple reality is...
...you've got to play the hand you're dealt. It is what it is. It can always morph into something better down the line.

Dennis is doing the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
241. I have a sneaking feeling that Dennis knows something we don't.
What exactly was said on Air Force One?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quickesst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
242. This.,...
..."He also said he will emphasis, as Obama did, that this is just a first step in the reform effort."...


......is what a real politician with the interests of the people in mind, should have realized, and been saying all along. It actually reflects the only logical path to real reform, given the social and political climate today, that can be realistically pursued. The sooner the "want it all, want it now" crowd understand and accept reality, the sooner the goal can be achieved. It never was, and never will be a quick fix, but the sooner people get on the same page, the sooner it will happen. I believe that when someone who's nobility gets to the point it becomes a detriment to the final goal, it's time to re-embrace logic, and common sense. Thanks.
quickesst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
244. I understand Dennis.
Like Dennis, I am torn.

I feel certain if President Obama would have used the bully pulpit effectively we could have achieved the Public Option through reconciliation. I believe this in my heart and it makes me angry with Obama.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
change_notfinetuning Donating Member (750 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
245. At least he wasn't beheaded! Safe from the terrorists. Our own. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
246. the bill is gravely disappointing and Mr. Kucinich fought all the way - He is making the right
decision and the strategically wise and correct decision. For all that is wrong with the bill, it still brings more good than bad. And the defeat of the bill would not be a victory for the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. It would however be a massive victory for right-wing of the Republican Party.

He fought all the way and did his best and now is accepting the not very good when the alternative is handing the right-wing of the Republican Party a great victory on a silver platter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spheric Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
247. I think Grayson has it right...
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 05:39 PM by Spheric
in this http://www.democracynow.org/2010/3/17/rep_alan_graysons_medicare_you_can">interview (17 minutes into it). It is wrong to vote against something that actually does a little bit of good because it does not do enough.

I think his approach by sponsering a separate bill that is simple (3 1/2 pages) for a buy in to medicare is the way this needs to happen. We should be using our energy to make sure that his bill comes up for a vote.

It's brilliant to separate this "buy into Medicare Public option" out on its own like this. Anyone who votes against it is voting against the interests of their own constituancy in order to prop up the Insurance industry and there will be no way they can walk away from that. The bill is as American as apple pie - you have to pay for it with your own hard earned cash. No socialism here.

I really think it is the only way to save the Democrats in November and even many Republicans will be hard pressed to vote against it.

Grayson has given us the oportunity and now is the time to rally. Please go to his website at WeWantMedicare.com and sign the petition. Then write everybody you can think of, including those good-for-nothing representatives we elected, letters to the editors, etc. The MSM is doing their level best to ignore the whole thing.

It is an absolutely positive step in the right direction and makes it very difficult for the opposition. Let's make this happen.

IMHO



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
250. Not really a surprise
I figured he would vote for the piece of crap medical insurance company give-away if it was all we could get. If he was the vote that would break it, I knew he'd vote for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
251. He folded like a cheap suit.
Ride on Air Force One and principles went out the window.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
254. I was speechless when I read he was voting yes, I would have given
a lot to have heard the conversation between him and Obama.

I received this from Kucinich in an email today:




Health Care is a Civil Right




Each generation has had to take up the question of how to provide for the health of the people of our nation. And each generation has grappled with difficult questions of how to meet the needs of our people. I believe health care is a civil right. Each time as a nation we have reached to expand our basic rights, we have witnessed a slow and painful unfolding of a democratic pageant of striving, of resistance, of breakthroughs, of opposition, of unrelenting efforts and of eventual triumph.

I have spent my life struggling for the rights of working class people and for health care. I grew up understanding firsthand what it meant for families who did not get access to needed care. I lived in 21 different places by the time I was 17, including in a couple of cars. I understand the connection between poverty and poor health care, the deeper meaning of what Native Americans have called "hole in the body, hole in the spirit." I struggled with Crohn's disease much of my adult life, to discover sixteen years ago a near-cure in alternative medicine and following a plant-based diet. I have learned with difficulty the benefits of taking charge personally of my own health care. On those few occasions when I have needed it, I have had access to the best allopathic practitioners. As a result I have received the blessings of vitality and high energy. Health and health care is personal for each one of us. As a former surgical technician I know that there are many people who dedicate their lives to helping others improve theirs. I also know their struggles with an insufficient health care system.

There are some who believe that health care is a privilege based on ability to pay. This is the model President Obama is dealing with, attempting to open up health care to another 30 million people, within the context of the for-profit insurance system. There are others who believe that health care is a basic right and ought to be provided through a not-for-profit plan. This is what I have tirelessly advocated.

I have carried the banner of national health care in two presidential campaigns, in party platform meetings, and as co-author of HR676, Medicare for All. I have worked to expand the health care debate beyond the current for-profit system, to include a public option and an amendment to free the states to pursue single payer. The first version of the health care bill, while badly flawed, contained provisions which I believed made the bill worth supporting in committee. The provisions were taken out of the bill after it passed committee.

I joined with the Progressive Caucus saying that I would not support the bill unless it had a strong public option and unless it protected the right of people to pursue single payer at a state level. It did not. I kept my pledge and voted against the bill. I have continued to oppose it while trying to get the provisions back into the bill. Some have speculated I may be in a position of casting the deciding vote. The President's visit to my district on Monday underscored the urgency of this moment.

I have taken this fight farther than many in Congress cared to carry it because I know what my constituents experience on a daily basis. Come to my district in Cleveland and you will understand.

The people of Ohio's 10th district have been hard hit by an economy where wealth has accelerated upwards through plant closings, massive unemployment, small business failings, lack of access to credit, foreclosures and the high cost of health care and limited access to care. I take my responsibilities to the people of my district personally. The focus of my district office is constituent service, which more often than not involves social work to help people survive economic perils. It also involves intervening with insurance companies.

In the past week it has become clear that the vote on the final health care bill will be very close. I take this vote with the utmost seriousness. I am quite aware of the historic fight that has lasted the better part of the last century to bring America in line with other modern democracies in providing single payer health care. I have seen the political pressure and the financial pressure being asserted to prevent a minimal recognition of this right, even within the context of a system dominated by private insurance companies.

I know I have to make a decision, not on the bill as I would like to see it, but the bill as it is. My criticisms of the legislation have been well reported. I do not retract them. I incorporate them in this statement. They still stand as legitimate and cautionary. I still have doubts about the bill. I do not think it is a first step toward anything I have supported in the past. This is not the bill I wanted to support, even as I continue efforts until the last minute to modify the bill.

However after careful discussions with the President Obama, Speaker Pelosi, Elizabeth my wife and close friends, I have decided to cast a vote in favor of the legislation. If my vote is to be counted, let it now count for passage of the bill, hopefully in the direction of comprehensive health care reform. We must include coverage for those excluded from this bill. We must free the states. We must have control over private insurance companies and the cost their very existence imposes on American families. We must strive to provide a significant place for alternative and complementary medicine, religious health science practice, and the personal responsibility aspects of health care which include diet, nutrition, and exercise.

The health care debate has been severely hampered by fear, myths, and by hyper-partisanship. The President clearly does not advocate socialism or a government takeover of health care. The fear that this legislation has engendered has deep roots, not in foreign ideology but in a lack of confidence, a timidity, mistrust and fear which post 911 America has been unable to shake.

This fear has so infected our politics, our economics and our international relations that as a nation we are losing sight of the expanded vision, the electrifying potential we caught a glimpse of with the election of Barack Obama. The transformational potential of his presidency, and of ourselves, can still be courageously summoned in ways that will reconnect America to our hopes for expanded opportunities for jobs, housing, education, peace, and yes, health care.

I want to thank those who have supported me personally and politically as I have struggled with this decision. I ask for your continued support in our ongoing efforts to bring about meaningful change. As this bill passes I will renew my efforts to help those state organizations which are aimed at stirring a single payer movement which eliminates the predatory role of private insurers who make money not providing health care. I have taken a detour through supporting this bill, but I know the destination I will continue to lead, for as long as it takes, whatever it takes to an America where health care will be firmly established as a civil right.

Thank you.
Dennis

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
255. I stand by Kucinich even so, and I suspect he will be one of the few
to remind the lawmakers in D.C. that the bill must be enhanced to reflect fairness for ALL Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merkins Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
257. This Episode of Masterpiece Kabuki Theater has been brought to you by...
a grant from MetLife and GlaxoSmithKline. Please be with us in our next upcoming episode 'The Social Security Crisis' coming to you sometime after November 2012. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
258. Kucinich on Larry King right now, 9 pm EST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC