Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why All House Democrats Must Vote for Health Care Reform

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:10 PM
Original message
Why All House Democrats Must Vote for Health Care Reform
Why All House Democrats Must Vote for Health Care Reform
Robert Reich
Former Secretary of Labor, Professor at Berkeley
Posted: March 15, 2010 04:21 PM

Health care reform is necessary, and House Democrats should vote for it because it's best for the nation.

They should also remember the political lessons of history. To paraphrase Mark Twain, history doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme. As the White House and the House Democratic leadership try to line up 216 votes to pass health care reform -- and as Republicans, aided by the National Association of Manufacturers and abetted by fierce partisans like Newt Gingrich, try to kill it -- I can't help thinking back to 1994 when the lineup was much the same.

I was serving in the Clinton administration at the time. In the first months of 1993 it looked as if Clinton's health care proposal would sail through Congress. But the process dragged on and by 1994 it bogged down. We knew health care was imperiled but none of us knew that failure to pass health care would doom much of the rest of Clinton's agenda and wrest control of Congress out of the hands of the Democrats. In retrospect, it's clear Republicans did know.

On February 5, 1994, the National Association of Manufacturers passed a resolution declaring its opposition to the Clinton plan. Not long after that, Michigan Democrat John Dingell, who was managing the health care bill for the House, approached the senior House Republican on the bill to seek a compromise. According to Dingell, the response was: "There's no way you're going to get a single vote on this side of the aisle. You will not only not get a vote here, but we've been instructed that if we participate in that undertaking at all, those of us who do will lose our seniority and will not be ranking minority members within the Republican Party..."

SNIP

...I remember how shocked we were the morning after the votes were counted. I asked one of Clinton's political advisors what had happened. "It was health care," he said, simply. (That advisor, by the way, is now in the Obama White House.)

Today's Republican battle plan is exactly the same as it was sixteen years ago. In fact, it's been the same since President Obama assumed office. They never were serious about compromise. They were serious only about regaining power. From the start, Republicans have remembered the lesson of 1994. Now, as they prepare to vote, House Democrats should remember the lesson as well.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-reich/why-all-house-democrats-m_b_499753.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's advocating for party first and nation second.
That makes us no better than the Republicans. I ordinarily believe Democrats should vote in a bloc for good progressive legislation, but this isn't it and any patriotic Democrat should not be in favor of a health plan that was originally proposed by Republicans during the 2004 campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Health care for 30M people is party first? Since when? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah, screw the other 15m who arent covered by this crappy bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Your arguments change with the wind. So don't pass it and screw everyone? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. No, the admin's position changes with the wind
So you're blowing to and fro to keep up with them makes it look like my position has changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Who isn't covered? Who are the 15 million? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. tell that to the 16 million left out.
Oh right -- I have to explain it pre-emptively.

46 million are uninsured. 30 million are *supposed* to get insurance under this mess. Thirty million from 46 million leave

16 MILLION with no options, who have been DISAPPEARED from the argument.

Guess *they* don't matter, as long as those pharma deals stick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Your arguments change with the wind, too. I'm vewy vewy sad you're so
miserable. :fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. That 15-16 million includes people who opt out. There's no way to know how
many people will choose to pay a fine rather than participate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. yep..see link...sellouts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bikesein Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I agree
Watered down Republican bill that no Republicans support. Why not pass a real reform bill since we are going it alone anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. to save obama's presidency. ok nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC