Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Senate Bill Tougher on Banks Than Expected

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:07 AM
Original message
New Senate Bill Tougher on Banks Than Expected
http://slatest.slate.com/id/2247826/?wpisrc=newsletter

Details have started to emerge about the bill to overhaul the country's financial regulations that Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd will introduce Monday, and it looks like it will be worse for banks than many predicted even a few days ago. Although the Federal Reserve would lose oversight of thousands of banks it still comes out as the "biggest winner in the bill," says the Wall Street Journal. The Fed would have the authority to supervise any bank or financial company with more than $50 billion in assets, meaning that it would still be able to watch over the largest companies, even if they aren't banks. The New York Times hears word that the bill would include measures that would open the door for shareholders to have "advisory votes" on executive pay as well as nominate directors for the boards of public companies. The bill would also create a council to study systemic risks to the economy that could order that certain companies be overseen by the Fed as well as make it easier for the government to take control and dismantle a large, failing financial company. In what is bound to be one of the most controversial aspects of the legislation, a new consumer protection division would be created under the Federal Reserve. It's still unclear whether the bill stands much of a chance seeing as though no Republicans are expected to support it initially, although Democrats are confident they'll be able to win some over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dylan Rattigan reveiewed the bill on Morning Joe and gave it a Thumbs Down.
Predicted the people will revolt and be ready to "throw
the bums out."

Different people see different things I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Does it reinstate Glas-Steagal? If not, then frankly it is pretty worthless.
Any bill that allows banks to continue to mix commercial and investment banking is simply setting us up for the next big boom/bust cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. Not a bad start. Glass-Stagal needs to be returned, also. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R&reinstate Glass–Steagall nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. What the two posters above said.
Glass-Steagall.
While the republics were busy chasing Clinton around they got that repeal through Congress!
I wonder if they planned it that way?
Republics are such misdirectionists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. giving the Fed oversight is like bringing in a fox to nurse a basket of chicks
Yeah -- this bill is gonna be *tough* :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC