Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US out of Afghanistan immediately?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:30 PM
Original message
Poll question: US out of Afghanistan immediately?
("immediately" meaning as rapidly as possible, while ensuring the safety of our troops)

Yes or No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. HELL yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Voted yes because the CiC stated exactly that as his goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Only I'm certain he left out the "immediately", otherwise we would be making
preparations to do just that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. no. his statements have never said either "immediately"
or placed safety of our troops as a criterion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. The poll in question qualifies the word "immediately". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldstein1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. An easy yes vote, since...
Bush never should have invaded, and
Obama never should have escalated, and
It's and illegal and pointless war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Exactly. No further side-stepping bullshit required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes, of course! War apologists be damned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. We lost. Get out. Get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I don't think there ever was a thing called win in either Afghanistan or Iraq. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Sorry, not quite.
I know..."corporate media" blah blah blah... but read this:

White House Weighs Talks With Taliban After Afghan Successes - http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/13/world/asia/13prexy.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Vietnamization and "peace with honor" redux.
Didn't work for Nixon, won't work for Obama. At best, he can cover his ass with a "well, we tried".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. I was Never for it and I want us Out Now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Urban Prairie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. Beginning the day after Obama was inaugurated, wouldn't have been too soon.
But the RW fundy bigots, career military officers, capitalist defense contractors, and conservative chickenhawks will fight tooth and nail to keep it going forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. How about the safety of all of those left behind,
the thousands of Afghanis who helped us who would certainly suffer revenge from the Taliban?
I would certainly anticipate a lot of hand wringing here about such atrocities, but since there will be no immediate withdrawal this is simply an academic exercise, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Urban Prairie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. What about the millions in "South" Vietnam?
Each new "conflict" that the US involves itself in, becomes more and more difficult to distinguish the "enemies" from the allies, and the 21st century enemy now wears no military uniforms, has no chain of command, nor flies any flag. This is a jihad fueled conflict, which should have been handled as a police action, and not necessitating the involvement of the US military, (who has been supplied and supported by for-profit defense contractors)from the get-go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. It would take a total transformation of Afghan society for that not to happen when the US leaves.
So the question is whether or not it's sound policy to leave US troops there until such a transformation exists -- something that could conceivably take more than a decade or longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chrisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. It's not our problem.
Just like how other atrocities committed in the world are not our problem. It's awful that it happens, but there's nothing we can do. We are not the world police.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yep. Shut it down.
And really, we should be out of every other damn country in the world which is not our own. These wars are not justifiable, they are not sustainable, and they are not "good."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. But Congress said no.
Which is why Obama didn't and won't bail.

In fact he campaigned on staying in Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. he wants to be a "War president" apparently
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SycamoreFlynn Donating Member (12 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. US out of Afghanistan immediately?
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. Obama's legacy will look better with a win. But what are the odds of a win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
26. Out now. There is no military solution.
If you really care about the people of Afghanistan then support the few, miniscule left-wing, pro-woman organizations in the country and bolster the tiny left-wing organizations in Pakistan. Our soldiers can't "bring democracy" to Afghanistan (even those who truly care) and Blackwater XE should not be getting our tax dollars. This is a war for position and mercenary gain. Those who died on 9-11 deserve better than to have their memory used for cynical tactical manipulation for global market expansion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. it is a scam. you are right.
there is no such thing as a "win."

look at Iraq. We leave, and it will be a totalitarian state within two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC