|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:10 PM Original message |
Could some Democrats be on the DC Madam's "list"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YDogg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
1. if they are, they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
2. Sure to be. The list goes back to the Clinton administration. ....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:37 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. But Repugs were in control of Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:58 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Don't know. Good point. ....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
3. But the Democrats don't run around preaching moral values |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. no, it will be about the individual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:18 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Right. Like they did with Clinton? ...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. the public didn't punish the Democratic Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 02:01 PM Response to Reply #5 |
27. it will be the party if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WiseButAngrySara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Precisely. "Family Values" and all of that ad nauseum. ....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
4. The Democratic Party is made up of human beings, both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
7. "Republic Noise Machine will be trumping the "everybody does it" defense." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
9. It's almost certain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
11. Let the light shine where it may...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
12. Probably. But, divorce lawyers are bi-partisan...and shopping for new Mercedes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
13. Could any of the 150 hires from the Pat Robertson School of Law be on the list? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 01:26 PM Response to Reply #13 |
25. wouldn't it be hysterical if Monica Goodling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IChing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 01:30 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Well, To-buy-ass was a hypocrite and I think that many of the 150 are hypocrites |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
14. why wouldn't dems be on the list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
15. There are most certainly Dems on that list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 03:02 PM Response to Reply #15 |
32. no, but they're not running around saying they support prostitution either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
17. I'm sure Disney has removed all the rethug names. Only dems will be left. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
19. Who's dumb enough to think that there *wouldn't* be any? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GumboYaYa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
20. Do you mean "Which Democrats are on the list...." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Madspirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
21. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 01:12 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. You get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
22. Yes, but their social policy usually isn't hypocritical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
23. But not the Abstinence Czar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
28. No doubt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
29. I'd be very surprised if there is not a Democrat or two on her list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 02:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Keep in mind that the list goes back well into the Clinton years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-30-07 02:43 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 08:03 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC