the Commander-in-Chief seems to have gone AWOL

[133724]

I am not now nor have I ever been a Democrat or a Republican. Thus, I do not speak for the Democratic Party. I speak for myself, as a non-partisan retired military officer who is a former Director of the National Security Agency. I do so because Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, asked me.

"In principle, I do not favor Congressional involvement in the execution of U.S. foreign and military policy. I have seen its perverse effects in many cases. The conflict in Iraq is different. Over the past couple of years, the President has let it proceed on automatic pilot, making no corrections in the face of accumulating evidence that his strategy is failing and cannot be rescued.

"Thus, he lets the United States fly further and further into trouble, squandering its influence, money, and blood, facilitating the gains of our enemies. The Congress is the only mechanism we have to fill this vacuum in command judgment.

"To put this in a simple army metaphor, the Commander-in-Chief seems to have gone AWOL, that is 'absent without leave.' He neither acts nor talks as though he is in charge. Rather, he engages in tit-for-tat games.


http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Former_general_declares_Bush_has_gone_0428.html

[global1]

1. Again?.....nt

[11 Bravo]

2. It's not like he hasn't had any practice.

Going AWOL is the only thing the jug-eared little prick is good at.

[HCE SuiGeneris]

3. AWOL? There has been a vacuous space residing in the WH since 2001...

[liberal N proud]

4. He isn't in charge

Dick Cheney and Karl Rove are with assistance from Kindasleazy