Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which film deserved more Oscar gold?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:27 PM
Original message
Poll question: Which film deserved more Oscar gold?
The films below were favorites that came up short at the Oscars. They either earned way fewer Oscars than predicted (Avatar, Inglourious Bastards) or none. Which film's loss of the Oscar disappointed you the most?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pochahontas II... er, I mean... Avatar!
Aside from the quality of the 3-D and the technical cinematics, Avatar was NOTHING original and the acting/cast was so-so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. cute!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Where did you get that? I MUST steal it.
I need to send this to a few people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Well, you won't be the only one doing stealing in regards to that film
The entire plot & motifs were mostly stolen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Ha ha ha ha ha
I never wanted to see it anyway, now I have excuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Nah - it's REVERSE Pocahontas
After all she went off with the imperialist conquerors in the end not the other way round.

More like Dances with Wolves with Giant Smurfs maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Actually, Pocahontas did go to England, where she died
Avatar appears to have ripped off the Disney version of Pocahontas, not the historical version.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pocahontas_(1995_film)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pocahontas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Yep that's what I meant - sorry didn't know Disnety changed reality!
Although come to think of it maybe I should have thought they would have!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. No, thats the white man's history
I have it on good word that she stripped naked and raided Jamestown in a suicide effort to stop Western expansion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. LOL. spot on. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Wrestler
It was better than all the films this year AND last year. Fuck their rules
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Endorsed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. Love that movie.
And I love anything about wrestling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Julie and Julia was a better movie than all the nominations

And Stanley Tucci was by far the best supporting actor in Julie and Julia than of any movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. I loved Julie and Julia.
But I could have done without Julie entirely. I kept waiting for the movie to get back to Paris and that astonishing couple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Possible reason for Avatar's loss: Actor's fear of replacement by virtual actors
Meanwhile, Fox seemed to downplay awards campaigning, letting Cameron take the lead. And what Cameron wanted to talk about was how frustrated he was that his actors, whose performances were captured by computer-generated technology, were not taken as seriously as live-action actors.

While his righteousness was sincere, that didn't go over well with many real-life actors who feel threatened by the possibility that they might be replaced by synthetic performers. That backlash might have mattered, because actors are by far the largest bloc of voters in the Academy.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6272CJ20100308
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Wrong. Its that writers feared theyd be replaced by monkeys
James Cameron shouldn't of hired the local zoo to rewrite Dances with Wolves. All the technology in the world wouldn't of saved that script
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. ouch!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Nonsense. Those WERE actors' performances we saw, not "synthetic
performers". And they were unduly dismissed, just as Cameron said. No actors are going to lose their jobs due to Cameron's facial capture process - they are integral to it.

Maybe in a few years, when the industry better understands just what he was doing, he'll get better recognition for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackintheGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. He's got a BILLION dollars (made up number)
who fucking needs recognition?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Someday, someone will surpass that monetary mark.
But this film will ALWAYS be the first to have the FX technologies that were developed specifically for this film. Just as "The Jazz Singer" was the first (major) talkie, and "King Kong" revolutionized stop motion photography, Avatar will be recognized as the film that created the digitalized facial capture photography that allowed the animated characters to have real human facial expressions (as absurd, scientifically, as that might be). This film also pioneered certain 3-D filming techniques that will become the industry standard. That is why it will be remembered by future generations, not for the amount of money it made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Where is Blind Side?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I didn't include 'Blind Side' because it got a big win... best actress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I thought it should have been nominated for best picture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. It was nominated for Best Picture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zonkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. I.B. was pointless for me. I love Tarentino the person. Pulp Ficton, Res. Dogs. Kill Bill all
all worked for me, in that order respectively. But I.B. did not feel like I was watching a master at work. Sure there was wonderfully maniacal attention to detail. But the story dragged. There was no genuine suspense. Sure, I enjoyed the campiness and mashed up cinematic and pop cultural references but ultimately I wanted it to add up to something more that just a celebration of Quentin's brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Same here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
25. Avatar!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
28. The correct movie did get the gold; but D9 should have done better.
It and The Hurt Locker were the best of the bunch. Avatar and IB were good, but not Oscar good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC