Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HuffPo: John Edwards INDICTED? Grand Jury Set To Indict Edwards, National Enquirer Reports

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 01:50 PM
Original message
HuffPo: John Edwards INDICTED? Grand Jury Set To Indict Edwards, National Enquirer Reports
A federal grand jury is about to indict John Edwards, sources tell the National Enquirer. The grand jury has been investigating the former presidential candidate since April 2009 for possible misuse of campaign funds -- Edwards had mistress Rielle Hunter on his payroll -- and indictment is now imminent. The Enquirer talked to one friend who revealed that John was "terrified":

"While he believes he's done nothing illegal in trying to hide his extramarital affair with Rielle and their daughter, he thinks the Feds are going to make an example of him."

<snip>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/03/john-edwards-indicted-gra_n_484200.html?ref=twitter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. well they've been right so far
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. It hink that is one of the signs of the apocolypse
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank goodness there aren't any war crimes to investigate. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. not a lot of soap opera style "drama" in that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. That is fine and good, but how about the republicans who did similar things? /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. You mean Ensign?
I believe that's being investigated. He's probably shaking in his shoes if this is true (and it could be, even if it comes from the Enquirer). Just be patient about Ensign. He could be in even deeper hot water than Edwards.

I don't have a lot of money, but I contributed $100 to Obama. If he had used that money to carry on with another woman and hide it, I'd be pissed. That's not why I give money to political campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Geez... an endless horror.
It's not a surprise that a fellow who worked for a hedge fund specializing in predatory lending businesses would do this kind of stuff... but it's still painful to watch the meteoric plunge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. and where does the similar investigation of John Ensign (R) stand?
Anyone want to bet which one skates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. I was wondering the same thing....is he under investigation??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Tut, tut, being Republican means being able to get away with almost anything.
No grand jury investigation needed, no lingering Corporate Media problems, no nothing.

It unreal and creepy in the extreme. Yet the double-standard is so tightly cemented and repeated over and over again it isn't funny.

Edwards may well be the last one to EVER speak publicly about Corporate Domination in our Inverted Totalitarian Empire.

The Corporations/Bushies are making an example of him, I think.

Unfortunately, his behavior gave them an in, and I say again his behavior can't be condoned.

It's just that Repugs frequently get away with the exact same sh*t which sink Democrats like Edwards and Spitzer.

Welcome to the Modern Far-Right Corporate State. NEW and IMPROVED with TEN TIMES the Plausible Deniability - it's RETSIN for totalitarian stink!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. You nailed it. They are going after Edwards because he dared to expose those bastards on t.v.
Didn't the head of the Chamber of Commerce swear he would get even with Edwards and anyone who had anything bad to say about big business?

Bastards! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'll never understand rich people
He didnt need to be a cheapskate and violate the law to pay her, he is rich.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. The way I figure it, must have been the only way
to get money to Hunter that his wife, Elizabeth wouldn't find out about.

Maybe Elizabeth kept a close eye on their joint accounts and his campaign account was the only one Elizabeth didn't have access to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Thats probably it
Still, a guy with that money can always find means to funnel it through others to hide its intended destination.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. He didn;t dare spend "family" money on her.. His WIFE would have objected
candidates play fast & loose with campaign money all the time.. Had there been no baby, he would have been okay because she would have had no leverage..and he would have just told her to go pound sand...and continues to lie.. he-said-she-said.. the baby changed the math
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John N Morgan Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. That's my American justice. John Edwards has an affair and gets crucified
Edited on Wed Mar-03-10 02:01 PM by John N Morgan
And the war criminals responsible for 1Ks if not 10Ks of deaths go free.

Love it.

In fact it is the same crap as the "Clenis" campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Exactly. It's not that what he did was right, but if he was a Repug he'd have gotten a standing
ovation on the Senate floor, and sympathetic Bushie prosecutors would have made sure he didn't have any problems with ongoing inevstigaions, which would have been covered up and buried.

Who would shout about it? A handful of Lib'rul bloggers?

The depth to which Bushification has taken over so much of our nation, particularly Law Enforcement and the Judicial system, is staggering.

It is close to Soviet-level double-standard, if not AT that level, particularly for high-level, public-eye Democrats vs. Repugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. so we shouldn't prosecute any crimes until buscho is prosecuted?
um, no. and sorry if he used campaign funds on his mistress he damn well should be prosecuted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. What a fall... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. What, did he use public funds to fly to Argentina? Oh wait
I think I have these affairs mixed up. Oh wait, that was ok 'cause it was a thug and there's no child that we know of. How silly of me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. The Quiet Dignity of Rielle Hunter
Now THIS is really outrageous. http://www.newsweek.com/id/233977 Glad I had the wastebasket handy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #14
45. Quiet dignity, plus facing a Repub grand jury and a possible alienation suit
Edited on Thu Mar-04-10 08:30 AM by unc70
Keeping ones mouth shut would be prudent for anyone facing a federal grand jury and a Republican prosecutor. Not to mention that Hunter could be sued in NC for alienation of affections. John Edwards has not made many public statements lately, either.

While that Newsweek article has some unflattering descriptions of Hunter/Dreck, they are much tamer than most. The piece cleverly avoids any of the details of her life prior to meeting John Edwards, or that she had previously come to national attention after her trial-lawyer father was the cover story in Sports Illustrated for hiring a mob hitman to kill her horse in order to collect the insurance. After that article, it was obvious that the fictional "Alison Poole" in her ex-boyfriends novel wasn't fiction after all but based on Hunter/Lisa Druck. (He is now married to the niece of Patty Hearst.)

No mention either that her father-in-law was the DA in the JonBenet murder case. Or that when she and her husband (also an attorny) separated, Hunter lived for two years in the house of Ann Bardach, a promient reporter and journalists, who just happened to write the definitive JonBenet article in "Vanity Fair".

Lots of people in the West Coast politcal circles, including several prominent bloggers and reporters, knew Hunter and it has been reported that some of them had copies of emails from Hunter about the affair, almost boasting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. He made his own bed
Or maybe not....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
17. Dupe --- deleted n/t
Edited on Wed Mar-03-10 02:25 PM by MicaelS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
18. Dupe ---deleted n/t
Edited on Wed Mar-03-10 02:25 PM by MicaelS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. oh smoove johnny, what will you do next?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. If true, you gotta figure that Edwards still poses some threat to our corpo-fascist rulers.
My guess would be that he knows how the 2004 (s)election was stolen (--knows more than we already know). If election night stories are correct, he is the one who didn't want to concede. Why?

----------------------

:grr: :mad: :patriot: :mad: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. ROFL
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
38. anyone that thinks that greedy corporate mr. hedgefund ever posed any threat
to his pals in the corpocracy is fucking beyond delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #38
43. You might want to research that hedge fund a bit more
One of the senior partners was a fundraiser for Edwards and Kerry in 2004.

He is also the source who was with Edwards in that NY hotel bar when Hunter apparently first talked briefly with Edwards. From his description, Hunter and a friend were almost stalking Edwards that night. Doesn't condone his behavior or hers and makes it hard to explain how that first encounter progressed to an affair.

If I remember correctly, one of the more profitable investments involving Edwards was in a company that recovered gold coins, etc. from sunken ships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
23. Good. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. If John Edwards was a Republican he'd have gotten a STANDING OVATION instead of legal scrutiny.
Has anyone seen an indictment for SITTING Senators like Ensign? Vitter? Bond?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. What about Governor Appalachian Trail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
25. All he has to do is tell the Grand Jury about his traditional views
of marriage, and how he never supported equal rights because of those deeply Baptist views that marriage is between one man, and one woman, a Sacred institution, made by God, like he did all over America when running to be Chief Adulterous Hypocrite and he'll be fine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
28. Good ... I find it really disgusting when
those in our party act worse than repukes. I expect better from those on our side and I hope he does get punished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. true...but...had he switched parties and become a Republican the odds are he wouldn't be scrutinized
so closely for any illegality involving his extramarital affair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
29. He's a Dem, not a republican war criminal, so
of course he'll be indicted. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
32. ¡Pura vida tuanis!
:hi: ¿Hace mucho tiempo, no? :hug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #32
41. ¡hey! Ha sido un montón de tiempo...
¿Cómo has estado? :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
34. Maybe he could be investigated but why in the hell are letting
all the republicans off the hook. Look at Ensign he paid off his mistress' husband and got him hired ILLEGALLY as a lobbyist.

Then of course Sanford was a state governor, but HE STOLE MONEY FROM THE STATE TO VISIT HIS GIRL FRIEND and the state left him office hook.

And darn there are plenty of republicans still in congress that the Justice Department half heartedly investigated and haven got around to do any thing about yet..long before they found out that Edwards had an extra martial affair. But then the impeach democrats don't they for having sex.
Republicans they let it go as routine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
39. We should see it in 24 business hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
40. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
42. Too funny. This all couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.
I have been endlessly amused by the whole saga.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
44. Indicted for what? It's not illegal to have your mistress working on your campaign.
As long as she actually provided the services she's billed the campaign for. Considering that she was the campaign videographer. I think the sex tape more than proves that she went above and beyond on providing services to the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
46. I won't believe it until I hear Edwards himself...
...deny it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
47. They'd better indict Ensign
and his family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC