Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poverty Formula Revised: New Method Doubles Number Of Elderly Poor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 12:38 PM
Original message
Poverty Formula Revised: New Method Doubles Number Of Elderly Poor
WASHINGTON — The government took steps Tuesday to highlight the increasing numbers of poor Americans, adopting a revised formula that is expected to double the number of older people classified as living in poverty to nearly 1 in 5.

Under the new formula, overall poverty is expected to increase from 13.2 percent, or 39.8 million people, to 15.8 percent, or 47.4 million, mostly due to rising expenses from medical care and other factors.

The new measure will not replace the official poverty rate but will be published alongside the traditional figure next year as a "supplement" for federal agencies and state governments, according to the directive announced Tuesday by the Commerce Department and White House.

Demographers say the main impact of the change will be to highlight higher numbers of Americans in poverty than previously known, particularly among Americans 65 and over. Because it will be considered a supplemental measure, however, it will not change how billions of federal dollars for the poor are distributed for health, housing, nutrition and child-care benefits. <snip>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/03/poverty-formula-revised-n_n_483594.html

Would be nice if it would lead to more help for people. What are they saying? We're now going to admit more people are poor but we aren't going to deal with it? Is there some way this would lead to changes in the social safety net, eventually?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CornerBar Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Poverty
"If we are serious about ending poverty, we have to be serious about ending
the systems that create poverty
by robbing the poor of their common wealth,
livelihoods and incomes. Before we can make poverty history, we need to get
the history of poverty right. It¹s not about how much wealthy nations can
give, so much as how much less they can take."

http://www.organicconsumers.org/btc/shiva112305.cfm

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No argument here. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. They should be ashamed -- throwing all those older people into poverty!
;-)

Seriously, poverty in America is generally underreported. But the elderly get smeared as "greedy geezers," with no attention to the high poverty rates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The guidelines for the federal poverty levels are horribly draconian. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC