Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(UK) Troops in Afghanistan face defeat at home

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-28-10 08:25 AM
Original message
(UK) Troops in Afghanistan face defeat at home
Troops in Afghanistan face defeat at home
February 28, 2010
Richard Kemp

OUR troops are up for the fight in Helmand. They know their mission is vital. And they are beating the Taliban in engagement after engagement, which brings to a soldier’s morale a quality all of its own. We can be proud and grateful that there is no shortage of courageous young volunteers to take up this fight.

But General Sir David Richards’s warning bell to the defence board could not be clearer: The Ministry of Defence’s spending priorities risk damaging the morale of our soldiers in a way that could undermine the long-term sustainability of the campaign. And his concerns could not be more serious: Morale is by far the most important factor in war.

This is no hypothetical argument: The chief of the defence staff has declared that our forces will be in Afghanistan at least for the next five years. Battalions are sustaining casualties at a rate of one in five on a six-month tour of duty. Teenage soldiers are fighting and dying in the most horrendous conditions and witnessing violence and depredations that most of us will be forever spared.

These brave men and women need to know that they are properly supported in battle, of course; but also that the government values them and their families enough to provide funds for a decent quality of life between tours.

General Richards is right to be worried. In July last year, while its troops were engaged in fighting more ferocious than at any time since Korea, the army was forced to make savings measures totalling £43m to help the MoD keep within budget. In October, a further £54m cut was announced, so that remaining resources could be focused on the war in Afghanistan. That may sound reasonable, but it is not. It demonstrates within the MoD and Treasury a breath-taking lack of understanding of the challenges inherent in running a long-term military campaign.


Rest of article at: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article7043954.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
howard112211 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-28-10 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. I was once told that morale essentially depends on the following factors:
Confidence in the leadership. Confidence in the own equipment and abilities. A well defined mission with goals that seem attainable. An overall sense that the cause is just.

I was told that "support at home" plays a minor role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-28-10 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yup but the support they need is in equipment and supplies, the only actual support from the home
front that counts is the family and the local community that the battalions are raised from and the troops can pretty much bet on that being there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC