|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 07:22 AM Original message |
"Today’s New Right looks a lot like the New Left of the ’60s" - your take? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 07:25 AM Response to Original message |
1. The ONLY thing I see in common is some degree of anger at the establishment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bosso 63 (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 08:21 AM Response to Reply #1 |
16. The tea party has a demographic problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 07:30 AM Response to Original message |
2. The whole comparison is insulting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Art_from_Ark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 07:35 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. I agree-- it's insulting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 07:44 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. We were the ones that brought forth the advancement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 08:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
79. Sullen, essentially hopeless anger of the Teabaggers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zoeisright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 07:58 AM Response to Reply #2 |
10. Exactly. They're murdering pigs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wolfgangmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 01:37 PM Response to Reply #10 |
102. You are likely right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hardrada (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 01:43 PM Response to Reply #102 |
103. We SDS organizers did exactly that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newfie11 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:10 AM Response to Reply #2 |
23. agreed n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:17 AM Response to Reply #2 |
28. The article was making a sociological comparison, not an ideological one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 08:29 PM Response to Reply #28 |
80. Nevertheless, it still doesn't work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:55 AM Response to Reply #2 |
48. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cetacea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:56 AM Response to Reply #2 |
49. +1000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 02:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
109. I think it's something we should learn from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asthmaticeog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 07:31 AM Response to Original message |
3. Good. Maybe they'll destroy the right's cohesiveness and derail its priorities |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 08:58 AM Response to Reply #3 |
22. Which priority did the sixties left derail? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 10:11 AM Response to Reply #22 |
53. How about the monolithic Democratic Party, that was in charge 80% of the time from 1932 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 02:56 PM Response to Reply #53 |
70. Eh? LBJ admitted that the Civil Rights Act screwed that pooch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 02:30 PM Response to Reply #53 |
111. I totally agree with your point about the fascist structure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
4. The only reason the so-called Tea Party has any credibility at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 08:07 AM Response to Reply #4 |
13. +1, ixion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 08:35 AM Response to Reply #4 |
17. +infinity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:15 AM Response to Reply #4 |
26. + infinity +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FormerDittoHead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:19 AM Response to Reply #4 |
29. +1. Everyone can just read ixion's msg above and leave this thread. Nail in coffin. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:26 AM Response to Reply #4 |
35. we on the Left know all too well what ignoring a group can do to a movement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:58 AM Response to Reply #4 |
50. !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 10:31 AM Response to Reply #4 |
56. I'd go so far as to say the "tea party" is a blank-canvass/bogeyman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pattmarty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 03:12 PM Response to Reply #56 |
74. I believe the political term is "neoliberals". I think we ought start............ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 10:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
88. +1 for popinjay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 06:42 AM Response to Reply #88 |
91. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 02:16 PM Response to Reply #4 |
108. Thank you. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 07:36 AM Response to Original message |
6. I wrote something similar a month or so ago about the left/right similarity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:20 AM Response to Reply #6 |
30. Given that most of these teabaggers seem to be Boomers I think it's an interesting mirror image. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:25 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Boomers haven't gone into retirement in significant numbers yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:31 AM Response to Reply #33 |
38. You mean what is often called the Silent Generation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:34 AM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Repeating a lie doesn't make it come true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:42 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Maybe I'm misremembering things, I swear I saw a lot of people in their 50s and 60s... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 10:04 AM Response to Reply #43 |
51. They all looked mid 60s to mid 70s to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Urban Prairie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 12:09 PM Response to Reply #43 |
63. Some boomers were like Ted Nugent or Jane Fonda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pattmarty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 03:34 PM Response to Reply #63 |
76. I don't know if it's fair to compare Nugent or Fonda? A more apt person would........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RFKHumphreyObama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 10:45 PM Response to Reply #63 |
89. Ummm....Jane Fonda is not a conservative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 02:58 PM Response to Reply #63 |
113. Jane Fonda was born in 1938, hence, not a Boomer. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catbyte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 11:47 AM Response to Reply #33 |
59. Generation Suck. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hardrada (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 01:56 PM Response to Reply #33 |
105. I am a War Child. Born just between the Organization Men |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Urban Prairie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:34 AM Response to Reply #6 |
40. IMO, by the mid-70s, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raccoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 10:07 AM Response to Reply #40 |
52. Most Boomers didn't do nearly as well economically as the characters in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 02:59 PM Response to Reply #52 |
71. No kidding, they were all rich and skinny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hardrada (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 01:48 PM Response to Reply #71 |
104. I hated "30something"also, Same people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:42 PM Response to Reply #52 |
85. A lot of us hit the job market just as wages stopped keeping up with CoL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 10:52 AM Response to Reply #40 |
58. I was in Boston |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 07:46 AM Response to Original message |
8. The difference is, many on the Right are heavily armed, and have already assassinated people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zipplewrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 08:36 AM Response to Reply #8 |
18. This is the important missing piece |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 10:19 PM Response to Reply #8 |
87. Blaming the victim for not leaving |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 08:16 AM Response to Reply #87 |
93. I didn't say it was "his fault". You did. And, I'm not apologizing for the Weathermen bombings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 01:27 PM Response to Reply #93 |
97. This is the link to the SF bombing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 03:26 PM Response to Reply #97 |
114. That article is dated March 12, 2009. Anything since then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harkadog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 03:35 PM Response to Reply #114 |
116. I have nothing more recent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 01:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
101. I don't think Robert Fassnacht "refused to vacate." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 03:28 PM Response to Reply #101 |
115. There were many previous bomb threats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timtom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 07:54 AM Response to Original message |
9. 180 degrees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 08:01 AM Response to Original message |
11. The 60s was different in that the masses of people involved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 08:02 AM Response to Original message |
12. Insulting. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Champion Jack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 08:07 AM Response to Original message |
14. Looks like they skipped Woodstock and went straight for Altamont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cetacea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:53 AM Response to Reply #14 |
45. Good one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cetacea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:55 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
15. ya right..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 08:36 AM Response to Original message |
19. Analogy Fail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philly_bob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 08:38 AM Response to Original message |
20. New Left didn't have corporate funding. /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
21. all you need is love vs. all you need is hate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CHelms (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:10 AM Response to Original message |
24. They are slightly similar, on the surface |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damyank913 (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:14 AM Original message |
Only in as much as they're angry and express distrust of their govt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
25. Good article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:15 AM Response to Original message |
27. The "60s movement" it most closely resembles would be the KKK. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kokonoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
31. The tea party is disenchanted republicans who lost their jobs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:22 AM Response to Original message |
32. No, the "New Right" looks a lot like the "Old Right" of the 60s.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:27 AM Response to Reply #32 |
37. YAF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Art_from_Ark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:22 PM Response to Reply #32 |
83. It does seem that the Teabaggers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hardrada (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 02:04 PM Response to Reply #32 |
106. Yeah. I have a BIL who has been a consistent racist gun nut |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wizard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
34. The bulk of the Tea Baggers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:32 AM Response to Reply #34 |
39. "Hated them for their freedom" LOL, epic win! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
36. Right on man, groovy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
42. Well, now and then one needs to see an incoherent argument just so you know what one looks like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 04:32 PM Response to Reply #42 |
77. The best response on the thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Commonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
44. Wait... You mean this wasn't The Onion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
46. The far Right fringe is unstable, lacking empathy and heavily armed. And more easily lead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
54. Such bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
55. It seems to me that "New" Democrats simply haven't learned how to co-opt this right wing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
57. T-baggers are owned and financed by the right wing elites . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
60. I hope so. The New Left was fucking useless. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 02:46 PM Response to Reply #60 |
69. Oh that's harsh. Look at all we accomplished: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
61. Further weak, drastically misguided attempts to align TBs w/the left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
62. It's true that in the 60s "The Movement" contained many disparate groups. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
placton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
64. Will, I was actually AROUND in the 60's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 01:21 PM Response to Reply #64 |
68. It wasn't my comparison. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
65. "but OUR causes were many" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
66. Sorta like comparing Mussolini's march on Rome to Gandhi's march to the sea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 01:00 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prof Lester (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 01:22 PM Response to Reply #67 |
96. Yes, My Thelonious-loving brother! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KingFlorez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
72. Not really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
73. I'm going to disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
75. No fucking way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madriver (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
78. Seriously... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 08:30 PM Response to Reply #78 |
81. Yes, that's exactly on target. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
82. I think they're still the same rednecks they were in the 70s. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
84. If the Left embraces diversity, why on earth would anyone expect us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 01:30 PM Response to Reply #84 |
99. Yet it's odd how some DUers clearly do NOT embrace diversity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 03:37 PM Response to Reply #99 |
117. Yes. DU is now huge so, we can count on our statistical share of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 03:41 PM Response to Reply #117 |
118. And then some...depending upon the topic at hand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 09:43 PM Response to Original message |
86. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-25-10 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
90. the teabaggers are the mullet of political movements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 06:43 AM Response to Original message |
92. Except for the difference between Love and Hate, you mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zeemike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
94. Perhaps the same dynamics but much different goals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zeemike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
95. Can/t believe I see a Will Pitts post at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prof Lester (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
98. 'Baggers hate African Americans. Period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
100. I believe all the ideologies in the New Left mentioned in your OP had a common basis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hardrada (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 02:10 PM Response to Original message |
107. Oh yeah? Show us their Baez or Dylan or Lennon! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
110. we were anti practically everything the Teas are for. The only comparison |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lotuspetal (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-26-10 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
112. New Right VS, 60's new Left |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 12:50 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC