Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Plot to Kill Social Security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 02:03 AM
Original message
The Plot to Kill Social Security


February 24, 2010


In Washington each new day brings a fresh call to “reform entitlement programs” — Social Security, Medicare, etc., (in Congress, the word “reform” now means to eliminate, or drastically reduce). Tackling Social Security has been on the to-do list of the corporate elite for years, and they’re not waiting any longer. After years of promoting this cause, conservative think tanks have now garnered solid support from the political establishment as a whole, which includes the Republican and Democratic parties.

The newest liberal recruit to the destruction of Social Security is Thomas Friedman, the influential columnist for The New York Times, who wrote recently:

“The president needs to persuade the country to invest in the future and pay for the past... We have to pay for more new schools and infrastructure than ever, while accepting more entitlement cuts than ever when public trust in government is lower than ever.” (February 20, 2010).

The nonchalance which Friedman calls for cutting Social Security is indicative of the climate in Washington, where the last remnants of liberalism have been suffocated under the heavy demands of profit-hungry corporations, especially financial institutions and big banks. For political hacks like Friedman — and there are thousands of them — the ONLY solution to curing the U.S. deficit is cutting social services in general, while specifically targeting Social Security and Medicare.........



http://www.counterpunch.org/cooke02242010.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deregulate, Privatize, cut Social Services - Party like it's 1929!
...if you're rich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Friedman = bloated, no-talent scum-sucker. He calls American workers "locusts".
he's a useless parasite, a toady of wealth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. "newest liberal recruit" = Thomas Friedman??? I don't know whether to laugh or puke! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. S.S. is not a damn entitlement..we paid for it..out of our paychecks..anyone calling it entitlement
Edited on Thu Feb-25-10 02:25 AM by flyarm
can kiss my A$$!

I didn't have a choice to not pay it..it got deducted ..no matter wtf I wanted..it was a forced savings for my future.. is what i have always been told ..since i was 14 years old and I got my first paycheck that it was deducted from!

I am 58 and i have paid for this fucker since i was 14 years old..entitlement my a$$!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. And if Reagan, the saint, hadn't stolen from SS to balance
is budget when he cut all those rich folks taxes, he wouldn't have started a trend that all republican presidents haven't followed suit. If SS was repaid all the trillions of IOU's from "borrowing" there wouldn't be any money for anything else. That's what is causing those republicans to get their gonads up, they want that money for wall street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. then what is Obama's excuse for now setting up a commission of sorts to look into cutting
Edited on Thu Feb-25-10 08:27 AM by flyarm
"entitlements"?????

Bush tried it and we the people shut his a$$ down..so why is Obama doing it now?

SS has no problems..Medicaide does..so why is Obama looking into doing something with SS..I paid for it damn it..it is my money ..it is not an entitlement..it has used my money, it has drawn interest on my money ..it has funded other things with my money..for over 4 decades!

It is my money!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Ever wonder what your SS would be worth if it were invested
safely, if there is such a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Entitlement doesn't mean what you think it means.
Republicans use the word pejoratively, as an insult, but "entitlement" simply means that the government MUST pay for those programs because the citizens are entitled to that money.

For example, welfare is NOT an entitlement program, because the government is no longer required to give it to anyone. Social Security IS an entitlement program, because the government is legally bound to pay it out.

Make sense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. letss reframe it as a non-negotiable covenant and they can eff themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. If there is anything at all that is off the table for a Democratic president,
it should be Social Security and Medicare cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. It damn well better be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-25-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. It's already come to that.
Obama said during the campaign that there shouldn't be a Social Security commission. But he tried to help some members of Congress get one fast tracked. When that failed he appointed one by executive order. He said everything, and that includes more Social Security cuts, is on the table. That means more Social Security cuts.

It should never have gotten to this point but it has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC