Well I , for one

[kimmerspixelated]

thought Bill Maher was pretty good, last night! Love Belzer, forgot the other big name-dang! ANYWAY..It was good to see Kucinich,and in my heart of hearts, I really think he is the best choice. But like Nader, he can never win, however, as far as war and defense of one's country, Kucinich is anti-war for almost any circumstances other than I suppose attack on our mainland, and I tend to agree with that platform, however, Maher isn't that anti-war and I suspect that many here aren't. Thoughts?

[panader0]

1. You are right- he is the strongest anti-war candidate of them all

Unfortunately for us peace lovers, that is considered a weakness by most, and makes him the long shot.

[Jillian]

2. That was one of the better Real Times

It was a good discussion group with no one person taking over.
Although I loved the little spat between Belzer and the RW person.

And Kucinich was great.
So was David Iglesias.

[newyawker99]

5. Hi Jillian!!

Welcome to DU!! :toast:

[in_cog_ni_to]

3. David Iglesias was on and a female NPR Baghdad reporter..then the RW IDIOT from ??? National Review?

??? American Spectator??? She was AWFUL wherever she's from! She should have just crawled in a hole, but chose to try to defend the actions of this cabal! She was so pathetic. BELZER ROCKED! as always!

I liked Bill Moyers new show better. I watched the first half hour of Moyer and had to switch over to Maher so hubby could watch Bill..:grr: I plan on watching ALL of Moyer from now on and tuning into the last half hour of Maher. Moyer is much more to my liking.:)

[elocs]

4. Kucinich is good and has something to say, inspiring debate and focusing issues,

but as far as getting elected it is as my sig says, "Reality is a harsh mistress".

On edit: that is, if you could read my sig.