Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Obama Proposal’s Lack Of Public Option Isn’t Necessarily A Catastrophe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 01:51 PM
Original message
Why Obama Proposal’s Lack Of Public Option Isn’t Necessarily A Catastrophe
The Plum LineGreg Sargent's blog
Posted at 02/23/2010, 01:12 PM EST
Why Obama Proposal’s Lack Of Public Option Isn’t Necessarily A Catastrophe

A bunch of people are wringing their hands rather loudly over the fact that the proposal Obama unveiled yesterday doesn’t have a public option in it. And that’s understandable: It would have been better for the public plan’s prospects if Obama had thrown his weight behind it in his first affirmative presentation of a specific health reform proposal.

But still: People need to chill out. The lack of a public option in the President’s proposal is not necessarily a catastrophe and doesn’t necessarily spell doom for it.

For those who are pushing the idea of passing the public plan via reconciliation, the chronology they were envisioning never was contingent on Obama including it in the proposal he takes to the summmit. The whole point all along has been to push Dems to stage a reconciliation vote on the public option after the decision is made to do reform as a whole via this route. This would only take place after the summit.

There was never any reasonable chance Obama would take a public option to the summit. The gathering is supposed to signal a willingness to compromise with Republicans in some fashion. Including the public plan would have just made it far easier for Republicans to cast Obama as acting in bad faith, since it’s been the provision most aggressively derided by the GOP as the centerpiece of the dreaded “government takeover” reform represents.

more:
http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/health-care/why-obama-proposals-lack-of-public-option-isnt-necessary-a-catastrophe/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. What's left to compromise? The insurance industry has what they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And don't forget Pharma -- that backroom deal got done very quickly
Don't expect anything to be done for the voters now that future campaign contributions are covered ad infinitum. And the SCOTUS ruling put the seal of approval on all the little deals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Only catastrophic to Obama's re-election chances
Edited on Tue Feb-23-10 02:02 PM by Hawkowl
I can't believe I used to think Obama was a political genius. The lack of a public option would be the beginning of the end of his administration's ability to accomplish anything. It will be his signature sign of weakness (think Carter's Iranian hostage crisis). What a maroon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sensible article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ah the ol' 3 Dimensional Chess theory n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC