Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Del. Robert Marshall (R-VA) says "punishment from God" abortion remark misconstrued, apologizes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:25 AM
Original message
Del. Robert Marshall (R-VA) says "punishment from God" abortion remark misconstrued, apologizes
Del. Marshall says abortion remark misconstrued, apologizes

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/22/AR2010022204512.html

By Fredrick Kunkle
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 23, 2010



Virginia Del. Robert G. Marshall apologized Monday to people with disabilities for remarks suggesting that women who have abortions risk having later children with birth defects as a punishment from God.

Marshall (R-Prince William) made the comment Thursday at a news conference calling for an end to state funding to Planned Parenthood. Calling the nonprofit group "Planned Barrenhood," Marshall joined the Virginia Christian Alliance, several African American ministers and others who blamed the abortion provider for a host of social ills.

"The number of children who are born subsequent to a first abortion who have handicaps has increased dramatically. Why? Because when you abort the firstborn of any, nature takes its vengeance on the subsequent children," Marshall said.

"In the Old Testament, the firstborn of every being, animal and man, was dedicated to the Lord," he added. "There's a special punishment Christians would suggest -- and with the knowledge that they have in faith, it's been verified by a study from Virginia Commonwealth University -- first abortions, of a first pregnancy, are much more damaging than later abortions."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Finally, they are getting butsed for the ignorant ass shit they make up.
Bout time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Makes you wonder where some of these
religious groups lived during the past, oh say, 25 centuries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sarah must have gotten to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. The only suitable apology should come from the voters in his district -get rid of him
..not that it'll happen, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Not going to happen
It's a good bet that most of the voters in his district agree with his comments. So, why would possible religious fanatics vote against a fanatic that represents their views.

For his supporters it's a win-win situation, they don't have to say how they feel, because he's doing it for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. marshall came within 70 votes of being the repub nominee for senate
in 2008. He ran to the right of Jim Gilmore who was himself too far right (and too incompetent) for Old Dominion to take.
Locally, Marshall has garnered around 60 percent of the vote in his past two delegate races.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. So he didn't apologize to women who have had abortions, just people with disabilities?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. Has anyone checked this study?
"it's been verified by a study from Virginia Commonwealth University -- first abortions, of a first pregnancy, are much more damaging than later abortions."

The VCU study he referred to was published in 2008 in the Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health and suggested that there is a higher risk of premature birth and low birth weight in children born to women who have had an abortion."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. here, I guess
"Previous abortion and the risk of low birth weight and preterm births" (abstract)

Based on the abstract, the study says nothing whatsoever about abortions of a first pregnancy. If one trusts the results, one might possibly say that the first abortion increases the odds of low birth weight and preterm births by a greater proportion than the second abortion. I don't have access to the entire study, and I don't know the related literature, so I'm not entitled to an opinion. I will say that the idea that abortion is a risk factor for future pregnancies is more plausible than the idea that God specially punishes abortions of first pregnancies.

To me, at least. "Your God May Vary." The bozo quoted in the OP has one hell of a god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Here's a synopsis of the study:
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the association between previous abortion and low birth weight (LBW) and preterm birth (PB).

Method: The study examined live, singleton births using data from the United States Collaborative Perinatal Project. Logistic regression was used to control for obstetric and medical history, and lifestyle and demographic factors.

Result: Compared with women with no history of abortion, women who had one, two and three or more previous abortions were 2.8 (95% CI 2.48 to 3.07), 4.6 (95% CI 3.94 to 5.46) and 9.5 (95% CI 7.72 to 11.67) times more likely to have LBW, respectively. The risk for PB was also 1.7 (95% CI 1.52 to 1.83), 2.0 (95% CI 1.73 to 2.37) and 3.0 (95% CI 2.47 to 3.70) times higher for women with a history of one, two and three or more previous abortions, respectively.

Conclusion: Previous abortion is a significant risk factor for LBW and PB, and the risk increases with the increasing number of previous abortions. Practitioners should consider previous abortion as a risk factor for LBW and PB.

....

I'm not a research scientist or a pediatrician, but it looks to me like the Idiot Marshall has inflated the numbers in this study and also conflates low birth weight and premature birth with life long disability. They can make for a rocky start for babies, sure, but lbw and pb are certainly no guarantees of life long problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. so sayeth the lord? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. Ah. The classic 'non-apology'.
*quoting the entire comment, so it can't be suggested it was taken 'out of context'*

"No one who knows me or my record would imagine that I believe or intended to communicate such an offensive notion. I have devoted a generation of work to defending disabled and unwanted children, and have always maintained that they are special blessings to their parents. Nevertheless, I regret any misimpression my poorly chosen words may have created as to my deep commitment to fighting for these vulnerable children and their families."





I have to thank him. I was contemplating having something to eat until I read that. My appetite's completely gone now . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I'm sure he's sorry if we were offended.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. He can spin this as much as he wants to..
but intelligent people can read what he said, and don't need to be told that they "misconstrued" anything.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
11. Fuck off, asswipe.
You said it, and we all know what you meant.

Seriously, go fuck yourself. Apology not accepted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Misconstrued, my old ass...This bastard should be looking for a real job...
he should not be in public office. I see there is a petition calling for him to resign, and I hope many people in his state will sign it.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. "dedicated to the lord" can be code for "sacrifice".
So much of that book seems written in code.
http://www.usbible.com/Sacrifice/sacrifice_moses.htm




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. Why is it that repugs always have to come back the next day and say...
"what I meant to say was...." ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
18. I also heard him say that what he meant was
an abortion stretches the muscles and weakens them so it stood to reason that a woman who had had an abortion would have a problem carrying a child to term. Umm, ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. Quoted verbatim, and it's US who misconstrued HIM
He's very sorry we didn't understand the wisdom of his words. Aren't we all ashamed of ourselves?

"Party of personal responsibility" my sweet Aunt Fanny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. misconstrued? how so? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
22. It's nuts like this that will continue the Republican party's journey into obscurity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC