Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm sick of the "Tea Party Movement" that the M$M keeps perpetuating

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:01 AM
Original message
I'm sick of the "Tea Party Movement" that the M$M keeps perpetuating
It seems whenever 2 or 3 "tea baggers" get together, it has to be covered in the media. If not nationally, at least on a local level. Instead of the news coverage being representative of the event, the coverage actually becomes the event. In fact, the news coverage eclipses the actual event in many cases.

Perhaps 600 people gathering for a meeting is news to some, but for it to receive national news due to the fact that a disgraced former Governor who quit her job halfway through was a speaker, one has to wonder why it has earned the prominence it has.

It's not as if the woman is particularly adept at public speaking. She has a whiny, nasal tone to her voice, and she uses inflections improperly. Her timing is a bit off as well, although not as bad as the former Terrorist In Chief Bush's was.

This is another example of today's M$M creating news instead of covering it. And this news coverage just fuels the tea bagger's ideal of legitimacy. The tea baggers don't exist because they're unhappy with government. They don't exist because they hate paying taxes. They don't exist because they are in love with their health care insurance provider. They don't exist because they want to bring about change. Those are the reasons they may give, but in reality that's not why they exist.

The tea baggers exist because they are racists. We have a black family living in The White House for the first time ever. And the tea baggers can't stand it. Their hatred for black people goes above and beyond all else. They don't much care for gay people, Asian people, anyone from across our southern border, or anyone they can identify as a liberal, either.

So, they gather with their hand made (and misspelled) signs. Protesting how government is too big, spending too much, out of control, etc. But where were they 9 years ago, when the white man in The White House was running up the deficit like never before? Where were they when that same man was starting two wars based on lies? Where were they when that man and his party were doing away with their rights and liberties? (Crickets...)

You can be certain there would have been rioting in the streets at the time had that man been black instead of white. Or gay instead of straight.

While we may expect Faux News to cover the tea bagger events with excitement, since that network shares in the tea bagger ideals to some degree, the remainder of the M$M should be treating these events for what they are: a small group of people who are funded covertly by corporations to promote their agendas. We know that the health care reform meetings of last summer included large numbers of people bussed in by the health care insurers with the goal of disrupting the process. And the M$M covered that beautifully as well.

What was missing from their coverage was the fact that the people protesting at those meetings often didn't live in the area. In some instances, they were employees of the health care insurers brought in (and no doubt paid) to cause a disruption. And that was really the story...but where was the M$M on that? Mostly silent.

So now, in the absence of a missing blond college student, a wayward homemade balloon allegedly with a boy in it, or some other distraction that fills air time, the M$M programs the tea bagger events, and presents them as legitimate gatherings of concerned citizens who are unhappy with the direction our government is headed.

What is mostly absent from that coverage is the real reason for their existence: racism and hatred. What we really need is an undercover mission to expose the real purpose of the tea baggers, like the pimp and his ho that visited ACORN with camera at the ready.

The M$M can never disclose the true reasons for the tea baggers, as that would be a disgrace and an affront to society. So, they take them at face value and churn up news where there really should be none. When you consider the reasons given by the tea baggers, they don't add up. Who really loves their health care provider? With premiums going through the roof, chances are only the CEOs of those companies truly love them.

And people really know where the deficit came from. The fact that a black man is trying to fix the problems left behind by the white man before him--and help the very people protesting his actions--doesn't serve the purposes of the corporate-owned, self-serving media, so that isn't the story.

So forget about the facts, folks. Believe what you are told to believe and do not question things that don't make sense. It's all for the greater good. Corporate America must protect its profits, and it will use its media divisions to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. the media is the enemy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. We're watching the true birth of Idiocracy
And I'm being serious. The Tea Party are the party of Idiocrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. If the results of such a birth ws as relatively mild and benevolent as that movie, it wouldn't be so
bad

But it will bring pain, suffering and death to millions, maybe billions, over the next century.

Worse than that, it will put the final finishing touches on the outflanked Age of Enlightenment for the Age of Totalitarianism or the Age of Propaganda Saturation or any of the other equally descriptive names for the obvious future that is now hurtling fast toward us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. You have it right. It's bad for all living things to have an Idiocratic Party
But it's the closest thing I know to compare it to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is how the MSM manufactures reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ggggghhhhh Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Like the Sarah Palin Hate-Fest?
If Sarah Palin gave a speech and no one in the media reported it, did it actually happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Or how the media ignores a protest with 100,000 people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Sarah Palin is a media sensation, fueled by the media.
In reality, she's not particularly newsworthy.

She quit her job as Governor halfway through her first term so she could capitalize financially on her sensationalism.

As I mentioned earlier, she isn't that great of a public speaker. She's not really moving or motivational unless you've already decided she will be. Her book was written by someone else. She is a documented liar and hypocrite. Other than the fact that she's been blown all out of proportion by the M$M, there's nothing particularly interesting about her.

The recent "Tea Bagger Convention" was a BUST. They expected a LOT more people to attend. They lost money on it. Quite a few of their scheduled speakers got wise and canceled before the event. Of course, Sarah didn't because she wants the money. She doesn't care what she has to do to get it. She's going to ride the wave as far as she can go, then she'll crap on the very people who helped her gain "celebrity" status.

If Sarah Palin gave a speech and the media didn't make a big deal out of it, it would likely be treated for what it was: a speech given by a former (now has-been) Governor, with big hair, a former GOP VP candidate (failed), to a small group of people who don't really fit into society today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. This post is more about teabaggers than I've heard in the past month...
from all the news sources I use.

(But, I'm not obsessed with watching cable news-- maybe that's my problem.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. The headline story on MSNBC.com right now is about the "Tea Party"
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/

That was my motivation for posting this.

Plus, I saw a couple of things on TV last night as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. A-Ha! I knew there was a reason I avoid cable news. There is..
it seems, a bit about teabagging in today's NY Times, but one nice thing about getting the daily fishwrap is that I can easily turn the page and pretend it was never there.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. Who benefits from wall-to-wall coverage of teabaggers?
Is it possible that the schism between 'mainstream' repukes and the teabaggers extends clear up to the apex of power & influence? After all, I've seen reports on here about FAUX News attempting to minimize the teabagger movement to their viewers, but the OP cites examples where the teabaggers are hyped 24/7 in the other corporate media. Are there two factions at odds with one another?

Perhaps the motivation for all the corporate media other than FAUX is ratings; are they hyping the teabaggers just for viewers who watch these nimrods for their entertainment value, or are powerful interests demanding that the airwaves get saturated with teabag drippings? Personally, I believe FAUX more closely represents how the 'establishment' repukes want the teabaggers portrayed: a passing fad whose time has come & gone. The corporate media who cover the teabaggers' every utterance must be receiving their orders from a different faction - one with a goal of wresting control of the conservative movement from the Republican party altogether.

I may be all wet in this assessment, but there seem to be lots of indications that a schism exists. I wish I had something to suggest as a way to exploit this to our advantage, but the only thing that comes to mind is to stand aside and let the two factions knock themselves silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. I believe the schism is a propgaanda lie, and the Teabaggers are doing what their Corporate
and Aristocratic Masters want them to do.

TeaBaggers are a PsyOp, plain and simple. They were never meant to defect from the Repugs, they are meant to suck up the 24/7 news cycle and reprogram the American Subject Populace for the next phase of our brutal transformation into Whatever the Hell We Are Becoming (HINT: whatever it is, it will be something that Hitler can smile at, from down in Hell, at his ultimate triumph of the will - and his Bush Family Friends).

In the end, the TeaBaggers will melt into the Repug Party, as they were always meant to. It what the Corporate Masters who are funding and running them want, and it is what they'll get.

The rest of us in the Subject Populace, being nuclear-carpet-bombed with the Aristiocracy's latest PsyOp, will become more inured to hypocrisy and lunacy, more detatched from reality (in direct proportion to how much we watch and believe Corporate Media propaganda and PsyOps) and more ready to accept the Evil That is Coming, probably in 2013, since it is obvious our Corporate Masters are speeding up the transition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. I see nothing good coming from the teabagger movement either
but still I wonder why FAUX doesn't speak well of the movement? From what I've read, they don't even faun over Sarah Palin any longer. We know that FAUX is a virtual arm of the RNC, so what's the deal? Other corporate media are trying their damndest to inflate everything associated with the teabaggers, so that indicates a schism to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
9. I just gotta ask.
How does continuing to talk, talk, talk about something, serve to get it out of the public eye?

Am I missing something?

Do you actually think you are going to shame corporate media whores and their pimps into changing their ways?

Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. I never suggested shaming anyone.
However, the more people who know about it, the more exposed they are. It will be more difficult for them to continue doing it going forward.

And this puts pressure on Congress to perhaps get their butts in gear and do something to address the runaway media in this country. Today, there is no accountability and no requirement to even report the truth.

As long as we allow the M$M to control the message, we will have a problem. And the M$M is definitely controlling the message right now. Not talking about it and secrecy are not to our advantage. The truth must be exposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Ok Andy..
... let me know when you've finished tilting at that windmill and I'll point you towards another.

(Just something to consider Andy, perhaps the general public isn't quite as stupid as you condescendingly paint them.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrsCorleone Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Agreed. Well said. This & the topic of the Citizens United ruling should be discussed until the low
info peeps catch a clue.

We will never regain a free press until the problem is understood by all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Got my answer edit..
Edited on Tue Feb-16-10 01:42 PM by DisgustedInMN

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. Well said. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. Tea baggers. Call them tea baggers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-16-10 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. Very true. KnR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC