Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Paul McNulty testifying today

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 02:48 PM
Original message
Paul McNulty testifying today
~snip~

Meanwhile, Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty, the department's No. 2 official, testified about the firings today behind closed doors on Capitol Hill. McNulty has come under fire for minimizing the role the White House played in the dismissals during a February appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

McNulty has since accused Sampson and another Gonzales
aide, Monica Goodling, of misleading him when he prepared for the hearing. Sampson, who spearheaded the firings, and Goodling have both resigned.

more:http://www.sltrib.com/ci_5766582?source=rss

DOJ Official Ignored White House Guidance
By Jan Crawford Greenburg
Monday 26 March 2007

Testimony contradicted Gonzales in US attorney matter, sparked controversy.

The firestorm over the fired U.S. attorneys was sparked last month when a top Justice Department official ignored guidance from the White House and rejected advice from senior administration lawyers over his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The official, Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty, ignored White House Counsel Harriet Miers and senior lawyers in the Justice Department when he told the committee last month of specific reasons why the administration fired seven U.S. attorneys - and appeared to acknowledge for the first time that politics was behind one dismissal. McNulty's testimony directly conflicted with the approach Miers advised, according to an unreleased internal White House e-mail described to ABC News. According to that e-mail, sources said, Miers said the administration should take the firm position that it would not comment on personnel issues.

Until McNulty's testimony, administration officials had consistently refused to publicly say why specific attorneys were dismissed and insisted that the White House had complete authority to replace them. That was Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' approach when he testified before the committee in January.

more:http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/032707B.shtml



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks so much for posting this. I knew someone was up on The Hill today!
Paul McNulty!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I"m hoiping he'll offer enough info to keep Schumer and Leahy
interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Oh, I think they're plenty interested!
I think they know one helluva lot, and I hope McNulty gave them even more information.

I only wish Dems would go on all the news shows & talk shows and tell the public WHY these hearings are so important, and how this US Atty. scandal affects every single one of us.

God knows the media sure isn't going to inform anyone.

:kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC