Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fox News Sinks To New Low, Reports Satirical Story (from The Onion) As Actual News

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 10:40 AM
Original message
Fox News Sinks To New Low, Reports Satirical Story (from The Onion) As Actual News


http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/27/fox-parody/

Fox News Sinks To New Low, Reports Satirical Story As Actual News

On Tuesday, Fox News morning show “Fox & Friends” aired at least eight segments on a purported “news” story that was actually a parody article written by a publication similar to The Onion.

The backstory: Last week in the town of Lewiston, Maine, a group of Somalian Muslim middle school students were the subject of a cruel prank when their peers placed a ham steak next to them in order to personally offend the students. School officials filed a report because the students considered the act to be a hate/bias crime.

This actual story was then spoofed by a parody site called Associated Content, which made up quotes and details, such as the school’s intention to “create an anti-ham ‘response plan.’”

On Tuesday, Fox & Friends reported these parody quotes and details as actual news. Poking fun at the students, hosts asked whether ham was “a hate crime…or lunch?” and showed screen shots of ham sandwiches, starving Somalians, belching, animal noises, and mock “reenactments” of the incident. Ironically, the hosts assured viewers several times, “We’re not making this up!”

Watch a compilation at link~

Fox’s careless blunder made news in the town and “launched an immediate avalanche of angry phone calls and ugly e-mails to the school system.”

In the parody, the ham steak became a ham sandwich. Fake quotes were attributed to Superintendent Leon Levesque, Stephen Wessler of the Center for the Prevention of Hate Violence, and one of the Somali students targeted in the incident. <…>

Following the Fox broadcast, Levesque’s office received dozens of angry phone calls and profanity-laced e-mails, made and sent by people all over the country, who charge the school district overreacted to what they believed from news reports to be a ham sandwich tossed at a Somali student. <…>

“Fox has figured out, from the calls we’ve gotten, that they’ve made a big mistake,” Wessler said.

“This is a wake-up call that the level of hate and anger, among a small population, is vibrant,” he added.

Levesque said he was bothered not only that the parody took aim at a sensitive issue in Lewiston, but also that Fox and others reported the information as fact without checking. The national media, Levesque said, sees information posted online and “uses it as gospel.”

We’ve long known Fox News’ reporting was parody, but reporting parody news is a new low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nothing on FOX can be trusted anyway
So they might as well be all satire for all I care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Who's laughing NOW, Fox Noise Channel? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. That mess up made big news here in Maine.
Edited on Fri Apr-27-07 10:45 AM by mainegreen
People were not impressed with how the mis-report was taken as fact.
Somali-Mainer issues are very sensitive here. I think a lot of people had misgivings about the group, but they have integrated well into our communities and have breathed new life back into some neighborhoods. I'm glad they're here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddaa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Onion is a credible news organization
Compared Fox, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. Has Fox responded to this yet
People need to start suing them just like they've done with the National Enquirer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. I saw it on Lou Dobbs 1-3 days ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's not just Faux, the ENTIRE corporate media
repeatedly airs rumors as fact, stories like this that would have taken about thirty seconds to fact check, opinion (RW opinion anyway) as fact, and repuke press releases as fact.

Yet they refuse to explore topics like 9-11 truth, lies about WMD, illegal wiretapping, treason in the WH, etc. because they can't multisource, cross-verify and get the Encyclopedia Brittanica seal of approval on any facet of those stories.

The corporate media needs to be purged and then regulated into submission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Completely agree n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. Lou Dobbs did it, too. Oops. Your bad, Lou. Tee Hee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToeBot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. I would think this is a step-up for them, provided the story was actually funny n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. Here's a screenshot of the video... Just in case it gets pulled.


FOX will probably force Think Progress to take the video down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Good idea; thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. Whoops
sorry I DID look. Did a search and everything. My bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
12. "We're not making this up"
True. Somebody else did. Fox merely reported the -- er -- story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
13. Gossip TV at its finest
Substance free sensationalism is what they do best. Sadly, America eats it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
15. how could their reporters be so stupid?
haahahha he actually says "I'm not making this up" repeatedly, how could their reporters be so stupid? Basic journalism much? In the end Fox News doesn't care about being so wrong with their story because it achieves their goals of fanning their mostly Republican viewers unique triumvirate of racism, nationalism and fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StefanX Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
16. Revoke FOX's corporate charter and their broadcast license
Edited on Fri Apr-27-07 11:09 AM by StefanX
I'm serious.

The airwaves belong to the public -- not to Rupert Murdoch. He has a license to use the public's airwaves. If he abuses that license, it should be pulled.

"The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest."

http://reddit.com/info/h7q5/comments

====

Ditto for his corporate charter. Incorporation is a privilege, not a right. If Rupert Murdoch abuses his corporation to endanger the public's safety, we have a legal basis for pulling his corporate charter.

"In theory, a corporation can have its charter revoked at any time, putting an end to its existence as a legal entity."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation

"Commit an egregious wrong, and have your charter revoked. In other words, lose the state's permission to exist. It's an intriguing concept, because most of us never think about corporations needing anyone's permission to exist. But they do.

Throughout the nation's history, the states have had -- and still have -- the authority to give birth to a corporation, by granting a corporate charter, and to impose the death penalty on a corporate wrongdoer by revoking its charter."

http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=1810

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
17. The parady was not from The Onion, but from Associated Content
Misleading headline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
18. I'll bet a steak dinner
that within a week or less, Faux News runs some talking head roundtable bullshit about how paradoy news sites should be "more clearly labeled" to avoid confusion or some horseshit like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
19. Lou Dobbs reported on it twice
First he reported it was a ham sandwich which leads me to believe he gets his news from Fox...then yesterday he reported it was a ham bone.

Somewhere in all of the media blubber, the fact that hate and harassment of minority students is lost. Another opportunity lost to discuss the problem and possibly prevent a future Columbine or VT incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Hate and harassment of minority students is...
SOP. At some point the American people will have to take responsibility for their airwaves. Or maybe not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. Have they broadcast a retraction? Love how the guy says he's checked it out,
the story's legit because he's seen it on a couple of web sites!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rude Horner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-27-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
22. Something like this happened a few years ago
when a news parody website similar to the Onion ran a story about a riot that broke out at a Kenny Rogers book signing, when they reported that he would not autograph a female fan's body part. The whole story was made up, but I had read that both ABC and AP reported the news story as fact, without checking into it's sources.

I had heard that the author of the website was trying to make a point that major news organizations report news that they do not fact check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
24. This comes as surprise to anyone?
"Levesque said he was bothered not only that the parody took aim at a sensitive issue in Lewiston, but also that Fox and others reported the information as fact without checking."

If everyone were bothered that Fox reported stuff as fact without checking, there wouldn't be any
more Fox.

What bothers me is that most people who watch that station aren't in the slightest bothered about
that little detail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-28-07 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
25. Journalism for Dummies
Sounds like The Onion read the book, while Faux decided to ignore it because it was a librul publication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC