Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sarah Palin: In A Nutshell! ----------->

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BLUSH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:11 PM
Original message
Sarah Palin: In A Nutshell! ----------->






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. nuts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhiannon55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Love this! What a group of loons. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BLUSH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Loons and Goons
Anyone remember 2000?











Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. That makes my blood boil... I remember it... lived it..still living it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BLUSH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. This November will the people remember what happened 10 years ago?
I think we may need to remind all Americans the horror that was the 2000 election and what followed, from the goon squads, to voter intimidation, to the Supreme Court's usurpation.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Those were the assholes who stopped the recount...aided by SCOTUS of course
I hope they are real proud of themselves for destroying many many lives due to W's many fuckups...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BLUSH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I bet most of them are teabaggers today.
NT


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Ones brains has to be infected with a pathogen to fall for the Teabag Shit
how else do we describe the anomoly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's a shame...
Dan Quayle would've been a great Teabagger candidate, spelling & all. I guess he was just ahead of his time... LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Dan Quayle was a Mensa candidate compared to this piece of work...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I was thinking he stood out as almost normal in comparison,
Man, how far we have fallen to think that he might be considered normal.


I need a drink.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. great....how about the one from the view as well hasselbeck..and coulter..
perfect..thanks..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. dan quayle, never thought anyone could make him look halfway intelligent
i was wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. You forgot one:
Edited on Sat Feb-06-10 10:48 PM by Catshrink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. OMG... is that a real picture?
Are those her eyelashes?? Please tell me this is a female impersonator...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Nope, that's the "Birther Mom"
I read that she actually filed another lawsuit in January. That woman doesn't quit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BLUSH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Orly Taitz to Run for Office?
Anti-Obama crusader Orly Taitz may be finished with her lawsuit in the Orange County federal courthouse, but that doesn't mean we're done seeing her around here.

In fact, Californians may get to know her even better in 2010--as a candidate for elected office.

According to recent postings on her blog (caution: malware infected), the Laguna Niguel dentist/lawyer is considering a run for either California Secretary of State or Attorney General. Why? To give her standing to sue Barack Obama, of course.

Considering that Judge David O. Carter threw out her Barnett v. Obama lawsuit largely because of "redressability"--meaning that regardless of a claim's merits (Taitz's have none, but that's another issue), courts can't remove a sitting president--it's not clear how being elected would make a big difference. But Taitz is gonna try anyhow.

http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/politics/orly-taitz-to-run-for-office/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Obama birth lawyer files new lawsuit
Obama birth lawyer files new lawsuit

Laguna Niguel attorney Orly Taitz was rebuffed in her request to U.S. District Judge David O. Carter to transfer her lawsuit to Judge Royce C. Lambreth. In his Jan. 12 ruling, Carter pointed out that he’d dismissed her effort to have Barack Obama removed as president, so there was no case to transfer.

So on Wednesday, Taitz went ahead and filed a new lawsuit - with Lambreth. She is seeking Obama’s original birth certificate, dismissing his “certificate of live birth” and the declaration of Hawaii’s top public health official as insufficient proof that Obama is a natural-born citizen and eligible to serve as president.

“From birth and until now Mr. Obama had citizenship of and allegiance to three other nations: Great Britain, Kenya and Indonesia,” Taitz writes in her suit, which you can read here.
Taitz, who’s also filed an appeal to her case in San Francisco federal court, explains in her suit that dark forces in the courts and beyond are working against her efforts.

Yep, still bat-shit crazy.

http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2010/01/28/obama-birth-lawyer-files-new-lawsuit/29117/

I think this is a "Quo Warranto Petition for Writ of Mandamus" (whatever that is). At the end of the article linked to is an update saying it will probably be tossed because she isn't an "interested party."

Here's the link to the lawsuit -- it's a good read in a WTF kind of way.

http://files.onset.freedom.com/ocregister/news/2010/01/orly2.pdf

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuddhaGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. she definitely looks like a drag queen LOL
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. you need to add O'Keefe to those pics
Edited on Sat Feb-06-10 11:20 PM by JI7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
16. They are a reflection of their constituency. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThatsMyBarack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-07-10 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
19. Guess you don't have to HAVE boobs to BE one!
Thanks for sharing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC