Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Homeland Security Adds Senator Shelby to ‘No-Fly’ List

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ThisThreadIsSatire Donating Member (697 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 06:06 PM
Original message
Homeland Security Adds Senator Shelby to ‘No-Fly’ List
(satire from http://TheDesperateBlogger.com)

DOJ to Investigate ‘Domestic Terror’ Allegations

Washington, D.C. –
Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL) has been placed on international ‘no-fly’ lists and the Justice Department has been asked to investigate the Senator for possible violations of the Patriot Act and related Federal laws.

The action follows Shelby’s blocking of all remaining nominees of President Obama who require Senate confirmation. Under Senate rules, none of the more than 70 nominations can move forward without a cloture vote (requiring 60 votes) in each individual case, or a lift on the blanket hold by Shelby. Under Marquess of Queensbury rules, as some Senate Democrats have proposed, Shelby and Presidential Aide Reggie Love could probably resolve the matter in less than twenty seconds.

Shelby placed the hold on the nominees over a dispute involving a Pentagon contract with Northrop Grumman for refueling tankers which the defense contractor would build in the Senator’s home state.

But according to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, Shelby’s action “… may violate Section 802, Paragraph 5 of the Patriot Act, which defines what constitutes domestic terrorism”. The Secretary also told reporters that the case has been referred to the Justice Department for possible investigation.

Legal experts find it highly unlikely that Shelby will face criminal charges. The relevant portion of the Patriot Act mentioned by Napolitano reads:

(5) the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that—

(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;

(B) appear to be intended—

(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or

(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and

(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.


Responding to accusations that he is using a dispute over a local matter to hold the Administration hostage, Shelby’s office released a statement reading; “The Senator, like so many of his Republican colleagues, embraces the President’s call for bipartisan solutions to our disputes, and also like his colleagues, believes the only solutions that could be acceptable on a bipartisan basis are those currently proposed by Republicans and many generous lobbyists, such as those currently representing Northrop Grumman.”

According to Constitutional Law Professor Kermit Guacamobile of Pueblo State University; “While the Senator’s actions are clearly intended ‘to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion’, may arguably, directly or indirectly, ‘involve acts dangerous to human life’, and clearly violate laws of decency and what most would accept as ’street law’, it is doubtful that he has violated any laws of the United States or the District of Columbia — so criminal prosecution would seem highly unlikely. As for being placed on a ‘no-fly’ list, however, that’s a judgment call by the relevant agencies and is not subject to normal legal standards and protections.”

When asked about the prospect of the Department of Homeland Security reversing its decision and removing Senator Shelby from ‘no-fly’ and terrorist watch lists, Newton Toomey, a Department official who spoke on condition of anonymity, said, “Let him commute between Washington and Alabama in a Winnebago like every other guy his age.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't you wish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThisThreadIsSatire Donating Member (697 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. As a friend of mine says,
'damn skippy!'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. too bad it's satire, as his actions clearly fall under the quoted section
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's unfair of you to get my hopes up like that...........eom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC