Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Physicists Kill Cancer With 'Nanobubbles'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 04:04 PM
Original message
Physicists Kill Cancer With 'Nanobubbles'
Physicists Kill Cancer With 'Nanobubbles'

ScienceDaily (Feb. 5, 2010) — Using lasers and nanoparticles, scientists at Rice University have discovered a new technique for singling out individual diseased cells and destroying them with tiny explosions. The scientists used lasers to make "nanobubbles" by zapping gold nanoparticles inside cells. In tests on cancer cells, they found they could tune the lasers to create either small, bright bubbles that were visible but harmless or large bubbles that burst the cells.

"Single-cell targeting is one of the most touted advantages of nanomedicine, and our approach delivers on that promise with a localized effect inside an individual cell," said Rice physicist Dmitri Lapotko, the lead researcher on the project. "The idea is to spot and treat unhealthy cells early, before a disease progresses to the point of making people extremely ill."

The research is available online in the journal Nanotechnology.

Nanobubbles are created when gold nanoparticles are struck by short laser pulses. The short-lived bubbles are very bright and can be made smaller or larger by varying the power of the laser. Because they are visible under a microscope, nanobubbles can be used to either diagnose sick cells or to track the explosions that are destroying them.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/02/100204204438.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. fcking brilliant...will BIG PHARMA allow this to go forward???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No. Are U kidding? Anything for their own profit protection.
Edited on Fri Feb-05-10 04:08 PM by glinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Once they corner the gold market, they will
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Bio-reseachers: BEWARE
Verb sap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Why not?
They'll own the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Gee, no, I'm sure they would much rather let people die earlier from cancer...
than help them live a much longer life and become a LONG-TERM customer.

Jeebus, the stupid... it burns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. you arent being very nice
and you dont read sarcasm very well.
now, I have to put you on ignore, for my own mental health and well being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-06-10 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. What was the point of the sarcasm?
Do you think "big pharma" medicines save more lives than they harm? Or do you think that "big pharma" gets together in their boardrooms and, while rubbing their hands together and chanting "MUAH HA HA HA", plot a way to MURDER everyone on earth?

Ah well, I guess I won't get an answer. You just wanted to bash something and didn't like getting confronted with facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Outstanding news
I hope it shows real promise in practical terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. More and more I see the world becoming more like Star Trek
Which is a good thing :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yep
Last night, ny daughter was on her webcam, conversing with her friend. I turned to my husband and reminided him that when we went to Disney World in 1991, we saw the "future" in the Carousel of Progress, and kids were doing just that.

Funny our future then is now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. If we don't kill ourselves off with war and such, we have a promising future as a species (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hmmm....so THAT's why all those late night tv people are buying everyone's gold. n/t


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. COOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. Awesome!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. I worked on something similar in college
We were making devices designed to undergo neutron capture to kill cells in a nearby area.

Basically, it seems there are dozens of ideas coming out following a formula

1. Create small particles
2. Get them to attach to cancer cells but not healthy cells
3. Get them to kill the cancer cells

There are tons of ways to do this. Radio waves, nuclear reactions, chemicals, light, etc.

I hope something comes out of it. So many labs are working on so many ways to do this, it should work and hit the market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC