Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What’s in a name?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Skelly Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 11:51 AM
Original message
What’s in a name?

Does language matter? Should we hold our elected representatives to a higher standard while permitting others the same offense? Or should we not tolerate the offense at all?
What is ‘name calling’ except a lack of communication skills usually verbalized in frustration? “You idiot” you yell as a driver just cut in front of you. It is not like you can explain to the driver that his behavior has nearly caused an accident. Not a very conducive environment for a teaching moment. It is pent up frustration that is verbalized with no other avenue of communicating.

However, face to face and written communications are different. If the point is to communicate effectively and perhaps educate another on a differing point of view, we need to stop with the name calling. We need to expect more from ourselves, our friends, our elected officials.
Once we have labeled an individual or group of people (retard, troll, breeder, wingnut, etc) as an expression of frustration, we have cut off the lines of communication with that person or group. We may momentarily feel better, but our ‘cause’ (the reason behind the frustration) can not advance. When the name chosen offends more than the person to whom it was directed (as in the case of Rahm Emanuel’s use of ‘retard’), we have shown ourselves to be either ignorant (we did not know it was offensive) or uncaring (we do not care it was offensive). Another block to communicating our point.

We have an agenda. We need to reign in those who block our agenda because they are frustrated. They will never advance our cause. Name calling should not be tolerated. By anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Conflict management
One thing that's important is to remember that reasonable people will become emotional, especially when willful ignorance is allowed to continue or when egregious acts are committed. It's then we (the reasonable, of course) have to manage our own frustration, name-calling, and broad-brush labeling.

As much as I hate bipartisanship (as it's come to be practiced by our president), I must acknowledge that it's the grown-up way to manage the inevitable conflict in modern political life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC