Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

facebook group: "Making Drug Tests required to Get Welfare"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 10:45 PM
Original message
facebook group: "Making Drug Tests required to Get Welfare"
I normally don't give a damn about dumb fan pages on facebook, (let's all be fans of slactivism!), but this one makes me pretty ill.

and it's close to 1.5 million "fans".

what's really disgusting is how many people I have seen that I know to be logical, fairly left-leaning, intelligent folks who have become "fans" of this unconstitutional, discriminatory idea.

if you can stomach it: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Making-Drug-Tests-required-to-Get-Welfare/170211991858

anyone have any bullet points written up? I'm thinking of making a parody page "Making Drug Tests required to Get Corporate Welfare" or something along those lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. How about fingerprinting welfare recipients?
Many states do just that, to make getting welfare as humiliating as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. NY does that just to get food stamps
I didn't have to because I could not take the time off work, but most are required to be fingerprinted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Same here. Pretty much all my friends have joined this
It's the children of people on drugs who suffer when welfare is denied.

A kid doesn't have any choice on whether his parent is addicted to drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyAndProud60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Exactly. I really don't see anything wrong w/ this if it has the support of different people. If its
just old angry white people, it may be a problem. I've seen Welfare abused by a lot of people for a lot of different reasons. Some people even take their welfare check and buy drugs with it. Use food stamps and buy drugs. And their kids are starving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. I have no problem with drug treatment being offered, and perhaps made mandatory
if a welfare recipient is found to be habitually abusing drugs, but a flat out denial based on drug testing is draconian and ultimately will hurt children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLyellowdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. I think any person receiving a paycheck should be drug tested first...
It's obvious that many people use their paychecks to purchase illegal drugs. We have to stop this behavior anyway we can. So whether it's welfare or regular pay, pee in the cup.

PBP...Pee Before Payment. Simple.

Is the sarcasm icon even needed here? You decide.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I already do get drug tested
Prior to employment and randomly thereafter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLyellowdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. So does my husband.
But not because of a morality/legal problem, but because his job is very specialized and requires a clear head. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Socal31 Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
28. Wait...
What does race have to do with this? Sheesh....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. that is keeping big govt out of our business..... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why not drug test everybody?
We all benefit from tax dollars. It would be more fair than singling out the poor who have less resources to fight false positives or get treatment if they are addicted to any illegal substances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. sounds logical to me!
I don't want my tax dollars going to any drug users! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa0825 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yeah, a local candidate I actually liked joined that group. She lost my primary vote. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. We are a mean selfish society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
voc Donating Member (279 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
30. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DBoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. So they are going to drug test everyone at Goldman Sachs?
I hope their cocaine meters go that high
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Funny thing - the only people on my FB who became fans are formerly drug-abusing welfare recipients.
Edited on Thu Feb-04-10 11:12 PM by Maru Kitteh
Such tests would have disqualified them for the assistance they and their children needed at the time.

OH - the hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
26. I noticed that too.
Edited on Fri Feb-05-10 01:10 AM by jmm
It's like living with a slob who washes the dishes onces then gives you the I better not ever see anything in this sink speech. Just because they may finally have started getting their lives together doesn't give them the right to start denying other people and their children food and a roof over their heads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Yuh huh. Glad is wasn't just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angrycarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. I fight it out with those people on Polls all the time
They are such talking points parrots that I seriously wonder why I do it sometimes. I guess it is because the liberals on there are so outnumbered that I feel I must help them present their case. I have quit so many discussion boards because the liberals fail to back each other up when all of the conservatives gang up on them. I won't put my real name on this board but if you go there you might recognize the well reasoned man with a firm grasp of the issues thanks to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. I saw one "Make Parents Get Drug Tested Before Their Kids Get Free Lunch."
Edited on Thu Feb-04-10 11:17 PM by Lex
Or something to that effect. I'd love to smack someone in their pie-hole over that one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. WOW. if I'd seen that, I would have laughed because I would have
thought it a parody... then headdesked when I realized it wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. I think using drugs is morally reprehensible
So... does anyone have any? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. Make Drug Tests Required to Run for Office
now there's a suggestion....

oh, and i'm totally on board with requiring drug tests for corporate welfare and bailouts too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. Making drug tests required to start a facebook group
Nah, we probably couldn't get enough people to take drugs just to start a group on facebook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brewens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
22. I can't support anything that infringes on our 4th amendment rights.
I do see how people that have to pass drug tests to work for a living feel that way though. It certainly has more logic than some of the stuff right-wingers fall for.
At the moment I can hear (if I try) the neighbors partying. A woman on public assistance and two or three guys she lets hang around and drink. None of them work for a living and it goes on all the time. Anyway you look at it they use our tax dollars to buy their alcohol. I wish we could stop that somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. find them a job with a living wage.
who wants to drink if you'll have to work the next day with a hangover?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KonaKane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
24. Shall we follow this through?
OK, lets. So let's drug test all the CEO's middle managers and others involved in taking bailout money. Every company, in every industry. That is a form of welfare, is it not? Let's test them for everything. Even the joints they probably had after a hard day's attempt to cope with an economy in the dumps.

So how is this gonna shake out for you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. um, did you read the OP?
I'm not at all in favor of this group, it physically makes me sick. I am pretty tired, did I garble that somehow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
29. .
Edited on Fri Feb-05-10 03:32 AM by fujiyama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
31. probably be a surprisingly larger than expected number of
TeaBag partiers who wouldn't be eligible for welfare either ...

aren't "red" areas quite likely to have meth labs these days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
32. they dont include Corporate Welfare?
pity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hollowdweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
33. Think about this

I work for a gov't program not welfare.

When we schedule them for an exam they usually have 2 weeks to a month notice of the exam.

If they miss the exam we are required to reschedule them at least once.

OK so most drugs are out of the system in a couple days.

I have a friends who tested themselves and it took 10 days for THC to clear the system.

So really this idea would only catch hard core addicts unless you sent a nurse randomly to the home and tested them right then. Probably half of those people would not be home and you'd have to come back after they had got the heads up.

I think tons of people on gov't programs spend their money on drugs. I also think drugs contribute to their unemployed status. However this program won't work.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
34. "You have joined the Facebook group I Really Just Hate Black People." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. There are more white welfare recipients than black ones.
But I'm sure that is the ignorance-fueled sentiment behind this Facebook page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
36. One of the MO reps started a FB conversation on this topic
Blew me away how many responded that they didn't like spending THEIR money on welfare recipients who took drugs. Or that they didn't support the poor so they could take drugs.

Why do people think tax dollars are THEIR money? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-05-10 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
37. Some of my friends have joined this and invited me to join too
Some of them didn't surprise me by joining, but a few did. So I decided to ask one of my level-headed friends why. He said, and I quote "almost all jobs require drug testing, so if I have to piss in a cup to earn a living, so should they."

I "ignored" the invite, btw.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC