Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shouldn't outsourcing be taxed?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:30 PM
Original message
Shouldn't outsourcing be taxed?
More and more jobs are being sent overseas and every time that happens the government loses tax income.

The new workers don't pay US taxes and the newly unemployed Americans receive unemployment benefits from the government.

When a company outsources they not only decrease costs, they are also draining money from the government.

Putting the moral and sociological issues aside, from a purely business standpoint doesn't this look like something that companies should have to pay for the privilege of doing?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's a great idea
Couple this with some sort of tax break tied to net increase of American workers over the course of a year and we could have a winner. These corporations who want to mooch off our infrastructure and give nothing back need to have their days numbered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. I believe that Kerry wanted to do that
In one form or another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beer Snob-50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. theoritically
i would think that the company that is hired to outsource would have to pay us fed inc tax on the money they received for their services. they received this money from a us source and as such should be taxable to the united states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Also, if the company becomes more profitable as a result of outsourcing
they should be paying more in taxes on that profit. In reality, I expect that neither this nor your suggestion actually ever happens, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. no, you don't get it. They get a tax break for outsourcing
And crazy as that is, that is the way they (the congressional/corporate oligarchy) want it. It's systemic and they make billions on it. So good luck trying to change it. Sorta like healthcare. Or banking. or the military. Everything frozen in amber where the richest get the most because they fixed the rules in their favor. And if global warming is real, we'll all die this way because of it.

Cheers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. True
Sadly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yeah - I was just going to ask that -- I THOUGHT there was some kind of
incentive (besides cheap labor) that had them leaving in droves. Profit, natch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. So the gov loses income and pays out to both the unemployed and the corporations.
This sure sounds like an unsupportable financial plan for the long run.

Unless you are trying to drown the government in the bathtub, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Jobs sent overseas = workers who don't earn or pay taxes here, so HELL YES
And raise the rates on the top tier of income too. Those benefiting from trashing the economy need to belly up to the bar and pay their fucking tab
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. In years past, imports (including those from American companies gone overseas)
Edited on Tue Jan-12-10 03:19 PM by whathehell
were heavily taxed which provided, among other things, a DISincentive for outsourcing...In fact I believe this is what Thom Hartmann is talking about when he calls for the re-instatement of tariffs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Heavily. Yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. You must not have gotten the memo
only little people pay taxes.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalviaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. YES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. Of course. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
16. If a thing says "assembled in USA" then tax (tarriff) the parts. Would this violate free trade
I've seen a million items with the assembled, or partially-assembled in USA tag on it and knew every single part had come from the orient and had been snapped together by some poor slob making minimum.

So why not put a tariff on all parts that will get further assembly in the US and then allow them to be labeled as made in the USA for all I care. Once parts become as expensive to import as they are to make domestically then the risk reduction of having a closer supply not subject to international disagreements would be enough for the "manufacturers" to buy domestic. Buy domestic means manufacture domestic means jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. At least enough to make it more expensive.
What REALLY pisses me off is when they use "American" names that they can't even pronounce. "Hewow, zis is Yason. How may I be hewpwing you today?"

If they're in another country, let them use their OWN FUCKING NAMES!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC