Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Spain calls for common EU stance on airport body scanners

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 11:55 PM
Original message
Spain calls for common EU stance on airport body scanners
The thorny topic of airport security has divided EU nations. Spain, which has taken over the EU presidency, has called for a common policy over using body scanners that takes concerns about privacy into account.

The Spanish EU presidency has called for a common European position on airport body scanners after member states clashed over the introduction of new security technology.

Spanish Transport Minister Jose Blanco Lopez made his appeal after EU experts met on Thursday to discuss the proposed measure. A number of EU countries, including Spain, are unhappy about possible privacy issues relating to the scanners, which can "see through" clothing to create three-dimensional images of passengers.

Lopez said that a common approach to security would be more sensible than member states taking unilateral measures, after Britain, the Netherlands and Italy decided to install the cameras.

"It's better for Europe to have a common position because it makes no sense for European passengers to travel from London to Madrid and back and have different controls", said Lopez.

"A common position would be better for all of us, even if it wasn't binding," he said.

<SNIP>http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,5098288,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Britain's has legal issues with these scanners.
Turns out that putting a child through one is illegal, because it creates an image that can be construed to be child pornography...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC