Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feds removing most bison from refuge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 06:18 PM
Original message
Feds removing most bison from refuge
original-missoulian

CSKT leaders: Feds removing most bison from refuge

By VINCE DEVLIN of the Missoulian


Two-thirds of the bison at the National Bison Range will be removed and placed in other national wildlife refuges around the country, Confederated Salish and Kootenai tribal authorities have been told.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced last week it was reducing staffing at the Moiese range from 17 full-time equivalent positions to 6.3.
Late last year, it abruptly canceled an annual funding agreement that allowed tribal employees to perform about half the jobs at the Bison Range.

In announcing the staffing changes, Dean Rundles, supervisor of national refuges in Utah, Colorado, Wyoming and Montana, told the tribes the herd would be reduced from its traditional population of 300-plus animals to “about 100,” according to Clayton Matt.

Matt, head of the CSKT Natural Resources Department, on Friday questioned the Fish and Wildlife Service's commitment to the Bison Range in light of the reductions.

“They've called it the crown jewel of their system and said it's got to be protected,” Matt said during a meeting with the Missoulian's editorial board. “Then with the flip of a switch they do this with no public input, and blame it all on budget constraints.”
~snip~
.
.
.
complete article here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. It is hard to understand this story
It sounds like budget cuts combined with inability to work with the tribal people who have a stake there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. I like the idea of moving them around to other locations
Especially if its for the purpose of strengthening the genetic diversity of another herd or to reintroduce to areas where there are none.
The budget cutting and reneging on an agreements with the tribes(like that is anything new) is not a good thing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC