|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
marmar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 07:47 AM Original message |
Stephen Bonaparte Harper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polly7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
1. People here are growing more than tired of his tricks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 02:56 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. I still don't understand how he lost a no confidence vote last year and then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 03:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. The prorogation was to avoid the confidence vote, not a reaction to it. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ck4829 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
2. Note to birthers, "Obama is a commie nazi" types, etc. This is how a dictator actually operates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 02:52 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Constitutionally this is legitimate; it's just a jackass move |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 08:27 AM Response to Original message |
3. Who does he think he is, Boris Yeltsin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
4. Harper doesn't want any opposition. This is just scandalous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 02:47 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. "Want?" You misspelled "have." (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 02:49 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. I can see why a control freak like Harper would like the neocon philosophy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 02:54 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Harper pretty much *is* a Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 03:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Yup. And he is right now hiding the worst of what he would do if he had a majority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
10. Didn't he do something similar to this last year? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 02:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Yep, and for similar reasons. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 03:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Yup. The other parties were going to get together and form a government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 03:05 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I sorta want to see the opposition parties find a tennis court somewhere... (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 09:11 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. I don't understand? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MisterP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
12. that's how Charles I lost his head nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
roamer65 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
17. He doesn't hold a majority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:34 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC