|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Ron Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:42 PM Original message |
We've got one more year to go in this Decade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seeinfweggos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
1. you are a lonely voice crying in the wilderness, my friend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
2. So the 80's was 1981-1990, inclusively? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
3. Oh damnit! You mean we're going to have to watch these top 10 of the decade clip shows again next yr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
groovedaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. So, what decade does the year 2000 belong to? n.t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. 90s according to this, I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
groovedaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. And therefore, 2000 was not the turn of the millenium. Makes perfect sense! ;-) n.t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:55 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Of course it wasn't. Rather, 2000 was the turn of America to the far right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
groovedaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-31-09 12:10 PM Response to Reply #9 |
24. No doubt! n.t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
5. i see it as 3 more years left in this decade... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:07 PM Response to Reply #5 |
18. 8 more years...i don't count the cheney years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endless october (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
8. disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Systematic Chaos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. So then, please remind us which of the previous 200 decades had only 9 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endless october (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:03 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. 2000 - 2009 is ten years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Systematic Chaos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 02:10 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. So then the first decade was ten years too: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endless october (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:03 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. there was a year zero. if they mislabled it, should we have to pay? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ron Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:03 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. 2000 was the last year of the 20th Century. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cirque du So-What (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
13. Posts like this make a compelling case for naming this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ron Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 01:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Well, there's my point. Instead of wrestling between Ptolemy and Copernicus, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
invictus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
16. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
19. If it is true that a decade is ten years, could not a decade begin in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeadEyeDyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
20. we count decades differently than centuries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
21. Don't waste your breath... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave29 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
22. *astronomy nerd alert* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-30-09 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
23. By that logic, I was 'born' 1 year after I left my mothers womb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 06:48 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC