|
I think that any diagnosis of human behavior has to be taken on a continuum rather than distinct A, B, C classifications. Therefore, I think it's overly simplified to say all people with sociopathic tendancies are this or all are that; rather, behaviors tend to be clustered and you can infer that if someone is a sociopath, one or more of the following behaviors should be present.
Ok, all that being said, I think it depends. Soliphism is the idea that your own mind and your own being is the only reality, everything else is imaginary (paraphrasing here.) For the sociopath, it's not a denial of reality but a denial of value. People are talking furniture. A chair will sit in the corner and be a chair for you with little difficulty. People require more effort but can be put to more elaborate uses. But the sociopath would never respect a human as an equal and never develop affection beyond an affable familiarity one might have for a favored tool. The sociopath would be able to mimic all of the right words, emotions, and body language to work with people but the real meanings are lost to him, like a tourist with a phrase book.
Ok, that's one type that's been described. But you also have other types where they can reserve human emotions and feelings for those that are special to them while still preserving a calculating indifference to everyone else. After all, Hitler loved his dog. He felt a great love for the german people and saw his destiny as linked to the nation. But at the same time, it was a selfish love, not a selfless love. The whole "if you love something, set it free" thing may be trite but it is also true. This is a conditional love, "I love what you do for me" and "I love how you make me feel." It is posessive. "I love you but if I can't have you, no one can." Hitler had his dog poisoned before he killed himself. He saw the German people as having betrayed him and the cause rather than owning up to his own responsibility in the disaster. He ordered the smashing of all remaining infrastructure in the country so that the German people would perish, having proven unsuitable for mastery of the world.
I think there is also a question of how functional a sociopath can be. Someone who cares for nothing and is motivated by nothing would tend to just drift through life and make no impact. Someone like Dahmer is driven and passionate about what he does, it takes work to kill that many people. Al Capone had drive. George W. Bush is unusual because his nature would make him be a low-impact sociopath (a son of nobility who would amount to nothing) but circumstances put him in a seat of power men ten times his stature would sacrifice everything to have. A sociopath with poor impulse control would find himself constantly in trouble with the law and never able to go anywhere with his life. (you could call him chaotic evil if you're thinking about it in D&D terms.) Lawful evil would be the ones working within the letter of the law and yet still spreading evil and bile. They're more harmful because they don't flame out as quickly, their ability to rise within society means their harm can be spread far and wide.
So getting back to the original question, "can sociopaths cry?" I remember reading the history of a Prussian king. He was the kind of man who could order thousands to their deaths and yet he wept at the beauty of an opera. I think it all comes down to what's important to the sociopath. I think with some they are able to feel like us but at half-strength. The sociopath could love his mother but decide that the value of her life insurance is worth more to him than the value of her company. (But only something like 4% of sociopaths are even violent so it depends.)
That come anywhere close to an answer? :)
|