Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush just said in news conf, the way Gonzales handled himself at

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:15 AM
Original message
Bush just said in news conf, the way Gonzales handled himself at
the hearing increased his confidence in him. He honestly answered every question he could possibly answer.

Evidently, he could not answer many with as many "I don't recalls he said".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. God---and double good
the longer GONZO stays on, the better it is for 2008. The repukes are freaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. Exactly ! Double plus good.
The clowns serve as a constant reminder what you get with
a Republican administration.... Lies and Incompetence.

Just shine a bright spotlight on em as they do their thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bwa ha ha ha ha. Spoken like an AWOL republcion deserter
Edited on Mon Apr-23-07 09:18 AM by SpiralHawk
Only a lameass chickenhawk republicon deserter could say such a thing.

Bwa ha ha ha ha ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dancingme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bush also thought Rich Little was funny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well, for sure. Gonzales is a firewall for Bush's operation in the WH
If I watched a guy humiliate himself in front of the entire world on my behalf I'd say something positive about him, too.

Bush is more confident than ever that Gonzo will be loyal until the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Increased my confidence in him."
IOW, "Increased my confidence that he'll keep his freakin' mouth shut no matter how great the pressure."

I see a Meddle of Freedom in Al's future.



.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. Did anyone watch Schumer questioning Gonzo?
Edited on Mon Apr-23-07 09:24 AM by Jim__
Schumer pretty clearly demonstrated that gonzo was still lying about Carol Lam. What is bush confident in? Gonzo won't rat on rove?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's starting to really look like he's scared to let Gonzo go.
Bush just isn't that loyal to anyone. I think Gonzo knows where a lot of old and new bodies are buried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grandrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. Ridiculous as usual!
He has to defend his lackey, what a disgrace...the both of them!!:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Bush must set standards of conduct and intelligence at a bar so low that only snakes can pass under
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
10. Perhaps but that just proves the point. Gonzo does not have the
capability of doing the job he was given. He and his boss are definitely examples of Peter's Principle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
11. Time to impeach Gonzo
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2007/03/24/gonzales_should_be_impeached/

SNIP

But can the House impeach the attorney general? The Constitution is clear that Congress may impeach "all civil officers of the United States." In our history, the House has impeached two presidents, and just one member of the Cabinet, William Belknap, secretary of war under president Ulysses S. Grant.
Belknap had profited from kickbacks by military contractors. The House began impeachment proceedings, documented the charges, and just before the articles were formally voted, on March 2, 1876, Belknap resigned. But the House voted impeachment anyway. The reason, as House Judiciary Chairman J. Proctor Knott explained to the Senate, "was that his infamy might be rendered conspicuous, historic, eternal, in order to prevent the occurrence of like offenses in the future."

A fine discussion of the Belknap precedent was written last December on the legal website findlaw.com, by, of all people, President Nixon's former legal counsel John Dean. (Astoundingly, the best lawyer the Bush White House can find for advice on stonewalling is another Watergate veteran, Fred Fielding.)
And speaking of Nixon, there's another reason to impeach Gonzales. Though the assaults on the Constitution by Bush and Cheney surely rise to impeachable offenses, the Democratic leadership has been loath to use the impeachment process. The fear is that partisan polarization, so close to the end of Bush's term, would overshadow the issues.

But now, the offenses of a Cabinet member criticized by both parties, and the stonewalling by the White House, have given ample justification. It's time for an impeachment, not just to oust Gonzales, but as a salutary warning to his superiors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. This makes me wonder when gonzo is going to have an accident
If he's smart and I have my doubts about that, he'll have a package squirrled away somewhere labeled to be opened upon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. they're prolly shopping for a new AG and will say Gonzo decided
that he ought to step down, and shrubby reluctantly agreed (ala rummy).

why not harriet meirs? the m.o. seems to be that you are really STUPID and/or naive so you can be led around by the nose. she's perfect! and if she was good enuff to be a supreme court nominee, this is cake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-23-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Gonzo will have total support from Bush until the instant Bush replaces him
just like Rummy did.

In W's mind saying FUCK YOU to those calling for Gonzo's resignation actually makes Georgie look strong. And he'll keep Gonzo on for a while just to rub the shit in Reid's and other's faces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC