|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:37 AM Original message |
Obama names conservatives to Legal Services board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:39 AM Response to Original message |
1. We can't take three more years of this n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:43 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. How many years can we stand a President that follows the law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:51 AM Response to Reply #4 |
13. Do some research. These assholes have serious agendas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:56 AM Response to Reply #13 |
19. Of course they suck they are Republicans which the article the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:01 AM Response to Reply #19 |
21. These are VILE Corporate Whoring Anti-human rights Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:06 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. and he omitted in the excerpt that they were bipartisan appointments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:11 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. The OP posted the first four graphs of the article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:16 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. I am absolutely accusing you of intellectual dishonesty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:23 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. DUDE! It doesn't HAVE to be a Republican! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:30 AM Response to Reply #32 |
39. The article clearly states that it does have to be a Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:35 AM Response to Reply #39 |
42. No, actually it says 'bipartisan' which is different |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 05:24 AM Response to Reply #39 |
70. You obviously aren't aware |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KakistocracyHater (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-24-09 03:47 AM Response to Reply #70 |
85. after "loyal bushies" hell yeah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:29 AM Response to Reply #29 |
38. The OP didn't edit anything. And he provided you the link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:10 AM Response to Reply #38 |
59. The OP didn't edit anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:13 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. I get it. You're trying to get the thread locked. Very shabby. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 02:54 PM Response to Reply #59 |
88. pathetic. you really owe them an apology. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:09 AM Response to Reply #29 |
58. Pacific Legal Foundation - from Source Watch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:16 AM Response to Reply #23 |
28. sigh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:44 AM Response to Reply #23 |
45. Pacific Legal Foundation ... from their web site |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:21 AM Response to Reply #19 |
31. The OP posted a news article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:43 AM Response to Reply #31 |
44. You have lowered your standards of intellectual honesty so that you take |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-24-09 03:28 AM Response to Reply #44 |
82. Nonsense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 03:00 PM Response to Reply #82 |
89. I completely agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 03:00 PM Response to Reply #82 |
90. I completely agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:53 AM Response to Reply #4 |
17. It could have been a moderate Republican, though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:56 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. The only moderate Republicans left are in the executive branch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:09 AM Response to Reply #18 |
25. Good point nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 11:21 AM Response to Reply #18 |
72. Agreet n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-24-09 05:04 PM Response to Reply #18 |
86. K&R for telling the unvarnished truth! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:19 AM Response to Reply #4 |
30. Browne is an ally of people like Ken Starr & Phyllis Schlafly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:26 AM Response to Reply #30 |
35. She is disgusting. LOL the NLG is already calling for her withdrawal! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 11:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
76. Amen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:40 AM Response to Original message |
2. I have an Exedrin headache. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:45 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Why because the President follows the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:49 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. lol, thanks for the facts, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:52 AM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Yes, I know, it's only a two minute prayer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:23 AM Response to Reply #7 |
34. There are any numbe of Republican jurists or attornies are not rabid right wingers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:42 AM Response to Original message |
3. Just great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:46 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. so your opinion is that the President disregard the law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:43 AM Response to Original message |
5. sigh... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:47 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. The poster in taking only part of the article forgot to say Republican appointments are req by law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
valerief (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:52 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Shit. Deeper sigh... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:44 AM Response to Original message |
6. Bipartisan appointments required by law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 03:13 PM Response to Reply #6 |
95. You've had your say several times....why do you insist on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
griffi94 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:48 AM Response to Original message |
10. this should be one seriously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:49 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. or you could actually read the article and see that Republican appt is req by law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
griffi94 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:52 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. yeah and i'm sure he couldn't find a moderate repub anywhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:01 AM Response to Reply #16 |
20. the appointments for each side of a bipartisan board are the responsibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:03 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. That's simply untrue. autorank used the article's own title and posted the link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:08 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. and omitted references in the article that he was appointing a Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:12 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. autorank posted the first four paragraphs as is the practice in LBN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:23 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. Your pathetic attempts now to run behind non existent rules to try and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:28 AM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Excuse me? I'm not trying to fool anyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:49 AM Response to Reply #37 |
49. common practice to post the first four |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:52 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. What utter nonsense. You obviously don't have two broken hands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:52 AM Response to Reply #49 |
51. It's not "slander". The rule says he has to appoint a republican, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:24 AM Response to Reply #51 |
63. "Obama appoints wingnuts to Legal Services" would be a more accurate headline. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:55 AM Response to Reply #63 |
69. i'd go further than wing-nut, myself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:11 PM Response to Reply #69 |
73. So many of these appointments are nauseating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:33 AM Response to Reply #33 |
41. Oh please. That's way overboard now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:38 AM Response to Reply #33 |
43. I can read. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 03:09 PM Response to Reply #33 |
93. I post the first 4 paragraphs in every forum when I post a news story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:26 AM Response to Reply #22 |
36. Straight quotes from a Democratic news organization and you're called a liar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:31 AM Response to Reply #36 |
40. WTF? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:59 AM Response to Reply #36 |
56. straight quotes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:11 AM Response to Reply #56 |
60. You only have that quote because autorank provided you with a link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-24-09 06:07 PM Response to Reply #56 |
87. Thanks grantcartg anyone who thinks you are not telling the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NutmegYankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:46 AM Response to Original message |
46. Perfect example of intellectual dishonesty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:47 AM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Wtf are you talking about? The OP posted a link to the article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:49 AM Response to Reply #46 |
48. So now we are to be held accountable at DU for a news service article? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:55 AM Response to Reply #48 |
52. caveats are you fucking kidding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:56 AM Response to Reply #52 |
54. he replaced a moderate republican with a wing-nut. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:58 AM Response to Reply #52 |
55. The OP posted a straight news story without comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:07 AM Response to Reply #52 |
57. You are just Forrest Gumping your way through this at this point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:30 AM Response to Reply #52 |
64. I'm now the designated Rasputin;) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:32 AM Response to Reply #64 |
66. I'm getting sleepy, very sleepy. . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:47 AM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Come, look in the Cabinet! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 11:07 AM Response to Reply #67 |
71. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 02:17 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. Sorry, I fell asleep! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 10:58 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. The Trifecta! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:30 AM Response to Reply #52 |
65. I'm now the designated Rasputin;) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:48 AM Response to Reply #48 |
68. Becauseu of people like you! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 03:55 AM Response to Reply #46 |
53. It certainly is, since the person being replaced was a moderate republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 04:16 AM Response to Reply #46 |
62. Wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 11:20 PM Response to Reply #46 |
80. Both nominees worked for Mitch McConnell? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-24-09 03:41 AM Response to Reply #80 |
84. Yes, and her's what else he's telling you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-24-09 03:38 AM Response to Reply #46 |
83. Hey, that sure looks like a PERSONAL ATTACK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoxFan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
77. Let's try this again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 11:14 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. I don't think anyone has disputed that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-23-09 11:18 PM Response to Original message |
79. Of all possible candidates, did he have to pick one of Mitch McConnell's bitches? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
autorank (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-24-09 02:02 AM Response to Reply #79 |
81. That was my question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistler162 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 03:04 PM Response to Reply #79 |
91. Well given that it was porbably Mitch McConnell who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistler162 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
92. OH NO HE FOLLOWED THE LAW!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mcablue (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-26-09 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
94. Obama should not have helped right-wingers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 02:20 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC