Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Out of the Blue, DARPA Seeks Means to Manipulate Lightning

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 04:48 PM
Original message
Out of the Blue, DARPA Seeks Means to Manipulate Lightning
China and Russia try to control rain clouds and the Dutch use technology to keep low-lying inland areas from flooding, so why shouldn’t the United States be able to manipulate lightning? In an attempt to better understand one of nature’s most powerful processes, DARPA issued a broad agency announcement yesterday asking for ideas on how to best protect American personnel and resources from dangers and costs associated with lightning strikes. To wit:

Lightning causes more than $1B/year in direct damages to property in addition to the loss of lives, disruption of activities (for example, postponement of satellite launches) and their corresponding costs. A better understanding of the physics underlying lightning discharge, associated emissions, and related processes (for example, tribocharging in the clouds) may lead to revolutionary advances in the state of the art of lightning protection.

Specifically, DARPA seeks validated models on the natural lightning process, a means of triggering lightning within a storm intentionally, and strategies for protecting a given area from lightning strikes during a storm by somehow reducing the probability that lightning will strike there.

The call for proposals also asks various questions about manipulating lightning’s natural unpredictability: “Given an area (size: 1 square kilometer) in the presence of a thunderstorm, is it possible to reduce the probability of a cloud to ground lightning strike in that area? How might lightning initiation be inhibited, or lightning propagation be diverted or blocked to achieve this goal? Is it possible to induce lightning in one region within the storm system, in order to suppress lightning in the region in need of protection?”
http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-12/out-blue-darpa-seeks-means-manipulate-lightning

Mother Nature is not amused. This will not end well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PetrusMonsFormicarum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's a good thing
that Nikola Tesla never committed many of his designs to paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Tesla was my first thought also. He was a gift to this world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Tesla I like.
He was a genius.

DARPA not so much....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes, damn DARPA and their internet thing.
And damn Benjamin Franklin and his researches into lightning. What good could possibly come of doing research, eh? Next thing some fool will be suggesting tall buildings have lightning rods to conduct the charge to ground, instead of being struck as God intended.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just stick any Bush on a high hill and wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Asking for ideas" is not the same as manipulating lightning.
And if we just assumed that any attempts to protect ourself from nature were bad and against the will of Almighty God (TM) then we'd never have invented the roof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. don't think i don't know what they're up to...

but they will NEVER learn the secrets of my lightning field...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC