Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

California Considering Mandatory Condoms in Porn Rule

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 01:43 PM
Original message
California Considering Mandatory Condoms in Porn Rule
California Considering Mandatory Condoms in Porn Rule

LOS ANGELES (AP) -- State regulators have agreed to consider a request from an AIDS advocacy group calling for mandatory use of condoms in porn films.

The AIDS Healthcare Foundation submitted the request Thursday at a meeting of the California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board.

The advocacy group wants current rules requiring healthcare workers to wear gear that prevents the spread of disease to extend to adult film sets.

The Cal/OSHA board has 60 days to evaluate the petition and issue a response.

http://www.news10.net/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=71999&catid=2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ok, which bureaucrat is gonna apply for the job to find the
shooting locations to see that this rule is enforced?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ahhhnuld might handle those responsibilities personally.....
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. One bunch tries to get Africans with AIDS NOT to use condoms
While another one insists that porn stars have to.

Can't anyone leave anyone else alone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. well- it will probably be a boon to another state's porn film industry.
it's not like they don't have cheap motel rooms to shoot scenes in elsewhere. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. In other news: Porn industry mulls relocation to Nevada.
They're not going to sacrifice the "money shot" to appease regulators. A set built in Vegas looks and films the same as a set built in LA. The porn industry is only based in LA today because long ago it drew most of its actors from the ranks of failed Hollywood hopefuls. That hasn't been the case in a long time.

The porn industry is dying anyway. The Internet and its free five minute clip sites are killing the traditional porn movie and magazines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You Can Still Have The Money Shot With Condoms
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Not if OSHA regs are applied.
The title talks condoms, but the request had nothing to do with condoms. They want OSHA healthcare worker rules applied, which requires a protective barrier be used to prevent ANY contact with fluids from another person.

That means masks for oral money shots, gloves for manual money shots, and condoms for money shots that might hit any other part of the body.

Porn is about fantasy. Nobody wants to see gloves and fluid barriers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Under That Scenario, Yes
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC