Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The look of women in politics

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 01:34 AM
Original message
The look of women in politics
WHEN PEOPLE say there’s no real difference between the way men and women in public life approach the issues, I am reminded of a pop quiz my seventh-grade biology teacher thought up, which I flunked. The quiz was simple: match the parts of the human body to the parts of a car. So the lungs were matched with the carburetor, the spark plugs were the nervous system, joints were like shock absorbers - or something. I am sure I still have it wrong.

The point is that almost all of the 13-year-old boys in the class aced the test and the girls - even ones who knew the functions of the human body cold - failed. Most of us had never looked under the hood of a car. We had a different reference for understanding the material, which the teacher (male, of course) never considered. With the exception of a press conference and rally Martha Coakley held to tout the endorsement of prominent women back in September, the winner of Tuesday’s Democratic US Senate primary rarely mentioned her unique frame of reference. She didn’t have to; her voice and appearance instantly marked her as different, and her campaign feared over-emphasizing gender might alienate moderates.
--
Or is there is a deeper, more interesting question to engage, the one Sonia Sotomayor determinedly dodged throughout her confirmation hearing to the US Supreme Court earlier this year: Do women judge or prioritize matters of public policy differently than men?

Women at Coakley’s victory rally Tuesday night certainly think so. “Men take too many risks, they’re too aggressive, there’s not enough concern about families,’’ said Joyce Paul of Medford. With Coakley, she said, “I hope we won’t go to war so easily. I want to go to peace, and education.’’

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/12/11/the_look_of_women_in_politics/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think in both genders their opions depend on their past
experiences. Someone who was raised on a farm is going to see things differently than I would because I was raised in a small town just outside of Pgh. I got a job in downtown Pgh. after graduation, and I learned the city quite well. I had no problem going there any time of the day or night. My FIL wouldn't think of going downtown at night because he thought he'd be mugged, or killed!

I worked with a girl who talked about what she did when she heard shots outside her home. "Hit the floor! and wait for quiet." I couldn't even imagine that!

I don't think it's gender as much as it is life experiences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting. More women = Maybe less Wars, conflicts over stupid shit
Although feminine-style political moderation is not always good, as seen with Neville Chamberlain and his appeasement "strategy." Sometimes you do really have to take a stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mayya Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Female heads of state are typically masculine
Interesting that you mention Chamberlain having a feminine style. That had never occured to me.

All the female heads of state that come to my mind have been masculine in a strong way. But not in a bad way. More like tough broads. I would probably choose any of them over the likes of Chamberlain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. By the time women become heads of state, they're socialized to be...heads of state. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. My dad, the mountain goat of humans, said that I should let my brothers change the oil in my car.
I once asked if I could learn how to change the oil. He said no. However, he thought it was a good idea for me to know how to drive stick shift. So my dad taught me how to drive a manual transmission vehicle.

Even today one of the best compliments for a female professional is to be called “tough".

So? Define "tough".

Women are pretty "tough" in many ways.
Obviously women aren't designed to go around beating people across the heads. We don't rape or pillage, at least not in any widespread historical measures. We don't knock heads, like you see in The Sopranos.

"Tough" means something different for a woman than it does to a man, hopefully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Tough, for me, means strong.
Able to bear things...hold up under stress...

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Exactly! "Tough" means you can stand up to the pressures of life.
Not that I'm so great at at that. But I try, I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Every time a woman is 'complimented' by saying she has 'balls', women are diminished.
Edited on Fri Dec-11-09 08:19 AM by Captain Hilts
We no longer 'compliment' blacks by saying they're 'white', why do we continue to do this to women?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-11-09 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. By the time you reach a leadership position, you're socialized differently. For example...
Eleanor Roosevelt would have dropped the atomic bomb on Japan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. she would? is there any citation for that statement about the woman who helped form the UN--and
helped write the Universal Declaration of Human Rights?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC