Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Option ARMs Come Back into Center Stage: 350,000 Active Option ARMs with over 200,000 in California.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 02:50 PM
Original message
Option ARMs Come Back into Center Stage: 350,000 Active Option ARMs with over 200,000 in California.
Option ARMs are the gift that keeps on giving this holiday season. As it turns out, these pesky toxic mortgages are still sitting waiting to hit recast periods. Like a street vendor taco these things went down nicely and appeared cheap but came with a hefty aftermath. The last option ARMs were made in 2007 yet they are still causing much pain in the housing market. Attorney General Jerry Brown has requested data from the top 10 issuers of option ARMs with a deadline date of November 23. It’ll be interesting to see what is released from the AG’s office. However, Standard & Poors issued a report on option ARMs last week and found that much of the problems with these loans are still to come.

One of the stunning points found was that 93 percent of option ARM borrowers decided to go with the negative amortization option otherwise known as the “minimum payment” option. This is something we have established from many fronts and data sets. The bottom line is the vast majority went with negative amortization and this grew the actual balance owed. Yet one of the new findings in the report was that 78 percent of all outstanding option ARMs have yet to hit major recast points. Given that 58 percent of option ARMs are here in California, this is a one state wrecking ball:

<SNIP>

“(CNN) There is another little problem that many option-ARM borrowers seeking refinancing would face: “Upwards of 80% of were stated-income loans,” said Westerback.

These are the so-called “liar loans” in which lenders did not verify that borrowers earned as much money as they said they did. Lenders may not be able to modify mortgages because many of the borrowers’ income could not stand up to the scrutiny. Borrowers may also not want to go through underwriting again because they could be held legally liable for deliberate inaccuracies on their original applications.

<SNIP>
http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/option-arms-come-back-into-center-stage-350000-active-option-arms-with-over-200000-in-california-73-percent-of-option-arms-have-yet-to-hit-recast-dates/


California and Arizona are truly screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC