Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Bid to Bypass Karzai's Afghan Government Upsets Allies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 01:06 PM
Original message
US Bid to Bypass Karzai's Afghan Government Upsets Allies
Source: Guardian

The US is seeking to extend its control over the day-to-day running of Afghanistan with the appointment of an international "high representative" in Kabul in an attempt to bypass Hamid Karzai's much-criticised government.

The initiative, being pushed by the US special envoy, Richard Holbrooke, has caused a split between Washington and its closest Nato allies, who believe it could further undermine the Afghan president's legitimacy and the United Nations' role in the country.

The proposal is part of a political strategy designed to accompany the dispatch of US reinforcements due to be announced tomorrow night by Barack Obama and ultimately provide an exit strategy.

The political package under discussion includes the installation of an Afghan chief executive at Karzai's shoulder in the government and closer international cooperation by a permanent "contact group".

The measures are designed to overcome the weakness and corruption of the Afghan government that the troops will be fighting to support. The British foreign secretary, David Miliband, has said the government would fall within weeks if Nato pulled out now.

Some European officials, including senior British figures, argue that the gains in efficiency achieved by appointing an international envoy with vice regal authority would be outweighed by the Kabul government's further loss of legitimacy.

more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/30/aghanistan-karzai-obama-united-nations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Flaneur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. We're replacing our puppet with a more pliable puppet?
This is embarrassing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. More like brushing the supposedly sovereign and democratic state of Afghanistan aside
while we do whatever the fuck we want to in their country. So they best get used to it. And smile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Imperial hubris pooch-screw #713 : Undercutting Your Puppet
Edited on Mon Nov-30-09 01:25 PM by kenny blankenship
thus casting ever deeper shadows and doubt on the legitimacy of the whole puppet theater you're running. Erodes your international support and makes your puppet hated and mocked by his own people.

Two thumbs way UP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. PNAC's Pax Americana is proceeding as planned.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. A "New Strategy" meets a 19th Century Strategy. Imperialism is just what it used to be.
"Picking up the white man's burden" is transformed into "building democracy" in Afghanistan.

And, "The Great Game" is now "The Great Chess Game".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nation Building 101 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. When their taxpayers are paying the major part of the bill for this
fiasco, then they can dictate the terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC