Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FAA turned down Boeing 777 warnings: report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 01:06 PM
Original message
FAA turned down Boeing 777 warnings: report
via Yahoo!:



FAA turned down Boeing 777 warnings: report


(Reuters) – The U.S. aviation regulator decided to allow over 130 Boeing Co 777 airplanes to continue flying international trips through early 2011, despite warnings about suspect parts that have caused rare shutdowns in midair, the Wall Street Journal reported.

In July, the Federal Aviation Administration had asked Boeing to install redesigned cooling systems on some of its jets with Rolls Royce made engines by January 2011, to prevent the accumulation of ice inside the pipes of the fuel systems.

The later regulatory deadline is due to the limited availability of replacement parts, the Journal said, citing industry officials.

FAA did not immediately comment on the matter.

The Journal said that according to the FAA, interim operational safeguards that were previously imposed provided an adequate safety margin to put off permanent hardware fixes until January 2011.

FAA turned down recommendations by the National Transportation Safety Board to order the replacement of parts on at least one of the two engines on each affected Boeing 777 aircraft, the paper said. ...........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20091130/us_nm/us_boeing_faa_2




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's why smart airlines bought the GE-90....
...instead of the Rolls-Royce for their triple seven's. This, incidentally, is an airworthiness directive, which goes through several layers of vetting by engineers before publication. Since I fly in the 777 all the time I'm not concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. "FAA did not immediately comment on the matter."
No shit lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC