Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Guest-List Chief Says She Quit Post

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 11:58 AM
Original message
White House Guest-List Chief Says She Quit Post

http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/declassified/archive/2009/11/29/white-house-guest-list-chief-says-she-quit-post.aspx


The White House staff member whose job was to supervise the guest list for state dinners and clear invitees into the events says she was stripped of most of her responsibilities earlier this year, prompting her to resign last June.

The account of Cathy Hargraves, who formerly served as White House "assistant for arrangements," raises new questions about whether changes that she says were made by President Obama's social secretary, Desiree Rogers, may have contributed to the security lapses that permitted Virginia socialites Michaele and Tareq Salahi to crash the state dinner for India's prime minister last week and get themselves photographed with the president.

Hargraves tells Declassified in an exclusive interview that although she had originally been hired as a White House political appointee in 2001, she landed a new position on the White House residence staff in 2006 and was specifically detailed to the social office to work on state dinners.

Her job duties included overseeing the invitations for guests at state dinners and keeping track of RSVPs, she says. On the evening of state dinners, she says, she physically stood at the East Gate portico entrance and greeted each of the guests as they arrived, checking their names off a computerized printout of those who had been invited.

But when she met with Rogers last February and went over her job responsibilities, she says, the new social secretary told her, "We don't feel we have a need for that anymore." Rogers's explanation, according to Hargraves: "In these economic times, I don't think we're going to have very many lavish expensive dinners. It wouldn't look very good."

A White House official (who asked not to be named because of the ongoing investigation) has refused to comment on any aspect of Hargraves's account, saying, "It doesn't matter," because the Secret Service has already publicly apologized for violations of its own procedures that allowed the Salahis to crash the Tuesday-night event.

-snip-

Still, Hargraves's account may be relevant because White House social secretary Rogers has publicly acknowledged that nobody from the social office was physically present at the White House East Gate entrance during Tuesday night's dinner to resolve any questions about whether the Salahis were invited. (This has prompted Rep. Peter King, the ranking Republican on the House homeland-security committee, to suggest the social office's policies should be reexamined as part of a congressional investigation into the incident.)
-snip-
----------------------------


passing the buck (passing the basketball)

and the buck stops on whose desk last?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like sour grapes.
Of course, it may be that you need to read between the lines. She was a BushCo person so the clearance criteria was probably limited to showing a company id from Halliburton, an oil company, a big bank, or any of the other mega-companies that owned BushCo.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. A disgruntled ex-Bushie complains
Color me not surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. The head of SS is responsible & they know that! Somebody
dropped the ball. I wouldn't want to be part of the WH SS after this incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. A former SS agent said on the TODAY show...
...that the Secret Service has been cutting corners ever since Homeland Security acquired them from Treasury. Yet another reason for abolishing DHS and setting the Federal bureaucracy back to its pre-9/11 configuration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. They are also dramatically overworked because of the hugh
escalation of threats to the current Prez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. "and the buck stops on whose desk last?"
What does that mean, exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. you have never heard that saying?

the buck stops at the Pres. desk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. So the President of the United States is responsible for security now?
He's a busy guy, I guess.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. President Obama was personally frisking people at the door on their way in. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I knew it
He's Batman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. holy shit was a bizarre stretch. is he supposed to be his own SS agent now?!
:rofl:

anything, and i mean anything to complain about eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. as long as they fix this shit, I'm ok with it. We could have lost our Pres!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. or what hell would have been released if something had happened
to India's head of state?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Do you know how long President Biden's speeches would have been? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC