Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Coakley (Likely Kennedy Successor): I oppose more US troops to Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:27 PM
Original message
Coakley (Likely Kennedy Successor): I oppose more US troops to Afghanistan
Source: Nashua telegraph

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts Senate candidate Martha Coakley said Sunday she opposes sending more U.S. troops to Afghanistan.

The Democratic front-runner in the race to succeed the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy issued a statement saying, “I believe we should begin the process of bringing our troops home.”


Coakley has said repeatedly she trusted President Barack Obama but would wait to hear him make his case if he wanted to increase the U.S. military presence in Afghanistan.

Yet two days before Obama is scheduled to address the nation on the subject, Coakley said “based on what I know now,” she does not support a troop increase.

Obama is expected to announce an increase of up to 35,000 more U.S. forces to defeat the Taliban-led insurgency and stabilize a weak Afghan government. The escalation, which would take place over the next year, would put more than 100,000 American troops in Afghanistan at an annual cost of about $75 billion.

Coakley said she is “very concerned” the case for more troops still has not been made. And she believes there is no evidence Afghan President Hamid Karzai “is a legitimate or trustworthy partner.”

more: http://nhbr.com/news/statenewengland/459388-227/coakley-i-oppose-more-us-troops-to.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. IIRC, Capuano is saying the same thing.
Here in the Tesha household, we lean towards Capuano, but either
Coakley or Capuano will be fine. The only wrong choice is Pagliucca
(sp?), the Republican running as a Democrat and trying to buy the
race with his wealth.

Of course, we're from NH so we only have a "sympathy vote".

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Long-Little-Doggie Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Capuano is winning in my poll in the Massachusetts forum!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. My recollection was correct; he said it again this morning on WBUR. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Pity that Dems only have enough spine to bash other Dems.
If as many people had griped about the Bush administration's lack of an endgame, we wouldn't need to be cleaning up their mess now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's tough being the good guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Most Dems Voted Against Attacking Iraq
Most "Dems" who backed it were looking to run for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. I Think Capuano Has A Good Shot
Particularly if he goes after her on the disturbing Fells Acres case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well isn't that special
The Commander in Chief meanwhile has made his decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. But, you see where the winds are blowing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. It sucks when real Democrats show up, doesn't it?
And imagine if she gets elected!

(In fact, soon, you won't have to imagine it; it's quite likely.)

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. So does Capuano
He takes a very firm stance on this deal. No troops without a plan to succeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. My worry is they'll try to "Paterson" her
She's very strongly pro marriage equality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. repeating that which was denied by both sides?
How can you do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Yes, b/c Obama is pursuing a witchhunt against those that support marriage equality
:eyes:

And of course trying to get Paterson out of the race was because he supports gay marriage, not because his poll numbers are in the 20s. Never mind that Andrew Cuomo also favors marriage equality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I wasn't necessarily
correlating the two, though I'll freely admit this WH could not surprise me on that front.

Why, btw, do you suppose the WH isn't pushing Deval to get out of the Mass race, when his numbers are as bad as Paterson's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. They aren't as bad as Paterson's
His approvals are in the mid-upper 30s and he's actually winning in the polls in a three-way race.

In any event, why would you suggest that gay marriage would be why they were pushing Paterson out when Deval Patrick is pro-marriage equality as well? Unless you have a different reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. Go Martha Coakley!
I wish that I could vote for her. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phasma ex machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
18. +1 "I believe we should begin the process of bringing our troops home."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC