Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Switzerland has banned minarets on buildings..

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 06:44 PM
Original message
Switzerland has banned minarets on buildings..
Edited on Sun Nov-29-09 06:44 PM by Peacetrain
Being talked about on NBC news now.. the uber right wing of Switzerland has won a big victory... Very surprising and unsettling.

edit to add: It passed with 57% of the vote..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Next...crosses.
Ya reckon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Well there is a huge anti Islamic sentiment going across Europe..
that kind of mirrors with what happened to the Jews in the 30's... that fear of a group.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
78. Really? Google "Jewish violence in Europe" and then tell me how similar it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. Oh, yes, crosses
A society that would ban minarets would burn crosses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
65. That's fine with me. Maybe then the religious insanity would abate a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. A lot of UN offices in Geneva.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. that's fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Highly surprising .. to say the least
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just plain stupid.
I guess the Swiss can be just as dumb as anyone else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. We seem to be coming out of the right wing nightmare and the rest of the world is
going into it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I thought you were talking about me. I had to look up - minaret.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minaret

Here's the info for any other dummies.

Minarets (Turkish: minare,<1> from Arabic manāra (lighthouse) منارة, usually مئذنة) are distinctive architectural features of Islamic mosques. Minarets are generally tall spires with onion-shaped or conical crowns, usually either free standing or taller than any associated support structure.



As well as providing a visual cue to a Muslim community, the main function of the minaret is to provide a vantage point from which the call to prayer (adhan) is made. Call to prayer in Islam happens five times each day. These times are at sunrise, noon, day, sundown, and evening. In most modern mosques, the adhan is called not from the minaret but from the musallah, or prayer hall, via a microphone and speaker system.

Minarets also function as air conditioning mechanisms: as the sun heats the dome, air is drawn in through open windows then up and out of the minaret, thereby providing natural ventilation.



Gee, because of the ventilation function, I would think that this will be overturned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. Of all the most ridiculous things to ban...
:confused:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. It looks as if there is a very strong right wing movement that has taken
this up as their cause..the "others" are a danger to us. I have to agree, of all the dumb things to ban..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Are current minarets grandfathered?
Edited on Sun Nov-29-09 06:57 PM by MercutioATC
...or is this a complete purge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, they are.
Existing minarets can stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. what's the reasoning behind the ban? is there a link?
min⋅a⋅ret

–noun a lofty, often slender, tower or turret attached to a mosque, surrounded by or furnished with one or more balconies, from which the muezzin calls the people to prayer.

Origin:
1675–85; < F minaret, Sp minarete, or It minaretto ≪ Ar manārah lighthouse, perh. akin to nār fire

Related forms:
min⋅a⋅ret⋅ed, adjective

Dictionary.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. It was on the NBC nightly news...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. That's just bizarre; there are only 4 of them in the whole country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. This was about half way down the article you linked and basically says it all
Across Europe, far-right parties have been scoring gains in recent years on anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant platforms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. More governemnt officials being pointless and ignorant.
This will accomplish what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Besides looking completely stupid.. (I think Switzerland got "bushed")
I have not a clue. Just goes to show, stupid knows no borders or boundaries. It is a universal state of mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Actually according to the news article in the other thread, government officials opposed this...
but the public voted for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Oh. That makes it even worse.
You can't vote
"the people" out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. Solidly biting my tongue on this one.
Hard, being a heretic and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
20. I applaud them! Crucifixes were banned in the classrooms of Switzerland not long ago
Religion should be taken inside. It should not be forced on others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Oh for heaven's sake!
I don't ever look at a church or synagogue or mosque and feel forced to do anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I'm completely in favor of separations of church and state - the more, the better
I think religions do a great deal of harm. Most of them, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. Apples vs Oranges...
While I agree with your separation argument, it does not apply in this case whatsoever. This is a Government passing a law to ban certain religious architecture on private buildings. These are not government buildings. Basically, it is like changing the local zoning laws to target a specific religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. So are you saying that all religious architecture should be banned at the same time?
Are you saying they should not have started with banning minarets? Why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #37
45. No...
Edited on Sun Nov-29-09 07:54 PM by kirby
I am saying that you mentioned separation of church and state as a principle, but that really has nothing to do with banning of religious architecture. This action is pure discrimination against an architecture that is part of a specific religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. So you're saying that if this was the first religious architecture that was banned, that's wrong?
Why?

And why can't countries and cities control the architecture of their place? Switzerland has a certain look. It always has. I'm sure they want to keep it looking that way, and not have it looking like Saudi Arabia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. I'm saying...
I'm saying that the banning of minarets has nothing to do with preserving a certain look of Switzerland and everything to do with anti-Islamic hatred which has been growing recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. That's your belief. But honestly, if they don't want minarets sticking out from between those Swiss
chalets, it's their prerogative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. I'm curious, is there any kind of exit polling on the reasons people voted the way they did?
Switzerland is a tourist area that relies heavily on it's "medieval" look. Many old cities have architectural planning commissions that won't allow certain kinds of buildings to be built in order to preserve the area's history/culture/look/ambience/commercial appeal....

I have no doubt that there was a certain percentage of people who voted against minarets because they are bigoted idiots, but you can't say preservationists had "nothing" to do with this vote. If there's an exit poll that proves your point, I'd love to look at it.

Otherwise dismiss medieval architectural preservationists at your peril. My daugher is a medieval archaeologist, studying for her PhD right now in medieval achaeology - they are a fanatic bunch and any resistance to a modern mosque complete with minaret would have absolutely zero to do with religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #49
77. something like that
Although the minarets towers on Switzerland’s 160 mosques do not broadcast calls to prayer, Ulrich Schlueer, one of the organizations of the referendum, said, "Forced marriages and other things like cemeteries separating the pure and impure — we don't have that in Switzerland, and we do not want to introduce it.”

The campaign against the minarets featured a poster showing a woman in a burka, the Muslim dress that covers the body from neck to toe, with a background of minarets in the shape of missiles.

Swiss Justice Minister Eveline Widmer-Schlumpf, who opposed the ban, told the Swissinfro.ch website, “Its supporters say they are against minarets. But they want to fight what they consider creeping Islamicization and Sharia law.”


http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/134681
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #77
79. I would certainly support fighting against Sharia law, myself.
"Forced marriages and other things like cemeteries separating the pure and impure — we don't have that in Switzerland, and we do not want to introduce it."


I don't blame them one bit. Why should a 21st century modern society tolerate 7th century tribal mores? If people want to live in that kind of culture, let them stay where it's practiced.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
53. Sigh.
That may be because you're an American and our Founding Fathers took a very strict stand on the issue of separation of Church and State.

Also because this country never fought a religious war. Whereas Europe has. Repeatedly.

Europe carries very different baggage on this issue than we do.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #53
68. I'm glad they did.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Uhhh this is a building.. not in a classroom.. It would be like banning bells in the steeples
:shrug:..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. I don't care. Religion needs to be kept personal.
I don't want it shoved in my face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. How do you keep a building personal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. I don't want any displays of religion out there.
That includes crosses, minarets, or whatever your particular religion's symbolism includes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Well on that we have to disagree... I wear a cross..but it is nothing against you
and is all about me and my commitment. I think others have the same right, including Muslims, Atheists, Buddhists..etc etc etc.. I do not want to live in a gray world where I would fear to show who I am or others could not show who they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. I live in a city where architecture does have a say on what architecture is permissible
and which not, and I'm all for rejecting all religious architecture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Again I disagree with that.. makes no sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Maybe not, but architecture is controlled in many places
Also, I'm not too fond of religions. The history of most religions is rather ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #40
56. Notre Dame? St Paul's?
The Sistine Chapel? St. Sophia? St. Patrick's? Should they all come down?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #40
63. Aventura, Florida is an architectural shit-hole.
You've got nothing to be proud of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #40
75. Sad that your mind is so easily rattled/scared that a building gets to you so much (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. That's a rather assholish ad hominen attack on someone who sees things differently than you do.
Maybe you need to mind your own mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #76
88. Seeing things differently by blanket condemnations against others (religion) I see as bigotry
Reminds me of something I could see happening with the rw "I don't want any rainbow flags on buildings, it promotes something I don't like".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #40
89. So you'd destroy all the churches, mosques and temples in the world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #34
51. Are you planning on urging the Europeans to take a wrecking ball
to all of their old architecture, going back centuries? You certainly would never want to travel there and risk running into some old Gothic cathedral or something horrible like that. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. No, but if they don't want minarets peeking out from towns of Swiss chalets and typical
architecture, it sure as hell is their prerogative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. The Swiss have every right to choose how to preserve their cultural heritage
including religious buildings. Switzerland is famous for it's "old architecture". I'm sure they want to keep that "look" - it's a tourist thing, a heritage thing, a pride thing, a historical thing... and probably has nothing to do with religion at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #55
64. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
And the Nazis were just trying preserve their rich genetic heritage and proud Aryan history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #55
86. That wasn't the argument she was making.
Edited on Mon Nov-30-09 12:48 AM by Crunchy Frog
She was arguing that religious architecture is bad and should be gotten rid of. I was just asking if she would take this argument to its logical conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. Next thing you know Muslim countries will ban Christian churches.... Oh wait. They already do!
Edited on Sun Nov-29-09 07:27 PM by Speck Tater
Muslims have nothing to complain about until they stop discriminating against Secular/Christian/Jewish/Buddhist/Hindu believers in their own countries. And so far, Muslim countries show ZERO tolerance of other religions, so why should anybody else bend over backwards for them? They can dish it out but they can't take it.

On Edit: Where's the damned outrage against Muslim countries who have the death penalty for converting to any non-Muslim belief? We're all full of outrage against one country's intolerance but turn a blind eye to another's? That's so hypocritical!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Speck... I wear a cross and you would have to burn it off me
before I would be "forced" to take it off. But this is a building. Just because the Taliban clerics were asshats, does not mean the rest of us have to repeat their behaviors..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #26
42. I'm an atheist and I would die defending your right to wear your cross.
The problem here is that Muslims are expecting privileges in another country that they are NOT willing to grant in their own countries. There is such a thing as being taken advantage of, and such a thing as being played for a fool. European countries are being played for suckers and they are afraid to say anything about it because some Muslims threaten them with violence if they don't comply.

Where's the parity since there don't seem to be any Christian (or Hindu or Buddhist or Secular) groups threatening Muslim countries with violence if they say anything anti-Christian (or anti-Hindu, etc). It's a grossly asymmetrical situation which if allowed to continue unchecked will continue to give Islam a strong Darwinian survival advantage in displacing all other religions in Europe. What would become of our sacred freedom of religion then?

History shows that once Islam takes firm root as a majority religion in a country it's violent intolerance of other religions makes it nearly impossible to displace. As long as we are afraid, either due to threats of violence, or due to "Political Correctness", to resist the spread of intolerance, then intolerance will continue to spread.

The delicate problem is that we, ourselves, need to be intolerant of intolerance, and I don't see the will in this thread to be intolerant of intolerance. Instead, I see people willing to tolerate intolerance until that intolerance gains enough leverage to stamp out the opposition (you and me). There are some things we simply should NOT tolerate, and violent repression of our religious freedoms is one of those things, along with any people who advocate or lobby for violent repression of our religious freedoms. Even if that movement to violently repress our freedom of religion comes in the guise of a religion itself.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. most Swiss Muslims immigrated from Bosnia and Croatia
there certainly are churches in those places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #42
59. Are you implying Islam has no place in Europe?
That is a rather intolerant and broad-brushed view. I see no harm in constructing minarets in Switzerland. I value people's contemporary happiness over the unfounded dark fears of the future. Also I would like to think that people and cultures are not reducible to some anthropological formula which is then used to engineer a "perfect" society.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomorenomore08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #59
66. +1
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #59
67. "I see no harm in constructing minarets in Switzerland." Well, apparently 57% of Swiss citizens
disagree with you. I'd say their opinion about what they want for their own country outweighs yours.

I don't see the problem; if the Swiss don't want to accomodate Muslim immigrants, they are under no obligation to do so.

sw

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomorenomore08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. And just how much do the Muslims living in Switzerland, including the Swiss-born
children of immigrants, have to do with that? You seem to be conflating together all Muslims in a sort of collective blame, which I don't understand at all. And you also conflate together all "Muslim countries," as if there were no difference between say, Saudi Arabia and Indonesia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
39. That's overstating it
Besides, what good it being that way in the west going to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sultana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
73. +100000000000000
:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #22
84. because we claim to be a free country while they are theocratic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #22
85. nonsense!! the vast majority of Muslim countries do have Christian churches
in fact Saudi Arabia is the only exception, I can think of
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dustbunnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
28. It isn't just coming from the right. And it's not a new sentiment.
From the Guardian article:

"The prohibition also found substantial support on the left and among secularists worried about the status of women in Islamic cultures. Prominent feminists attacked minarets as male power symbols, deplored the oppression of Muslim women, and urged a vote for the ban."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. saw that earlier...i thought that was just plain weird
sometimes i wonder abt democracy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
36. Uhm, isn't this architecture? Mosques aren't banned, just minarets.
The purpose of the minaret was/is to call Muslims to prayer 5 times/day. I know that doesn't necessarily happen in the west where mosques with minarets have been built but the reason for minarets is moot in secular western countries where that kind of public loudspeaker 5 times/day would be disallowed.

There's this hideous mosque on Rt. 55 west of Chicago - a big box with a minaret in one corner. THAT minaret is atrocious. There's an absolutely stunning mosque on Rt. 53 in Lisle that has no minaret and is fantastic architecture.

I see this as about Europe's old architecture and an area's cultural history and trying to preserve that (which is a big deal in Europe too) than some simple anti-Islamic bashing. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #36
82. Well, sorry, if enough Islamic people live there, then their culture is changing.
Come on, there are only four of these in the entire country!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
41. That's just plain old stupid
If they banned crosses, it wouldn't mean people weren't Christian and it would give them fodder for claiming persecution. Same result here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
48. Ridiculous!
Many buildings have used religious architecture without being remotely religious. This is bigotry hidden under a veil of culture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
57. Europe goes to the right when things go sour, America to the left.
It's almost like FDR and Hitler all over again (except much much much less extreme.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
58. What's a minaret? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. They grow up to be Majorettes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. LOL! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #60
69. DUzy!
That was hilarious! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #58
62. Tall spires, usually built on the corners of mosques.
For some reason, a lot of people pronounce them "mini-arets" and misspell them as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #58
70. Picture - Blue Mosque in Istanbul
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #58
71. I had to look it up. Here's a photo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
72. The people have spoken. Who are we to judge the Swiss for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sultana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
74. Good for the Swiss
....and yes, they have the right to make their own laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #74
80. Prop. 8 Supporter Much? /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
81. Yikes. This is very sad. ro
The people may have "spoken," but wow, these people are afraid of change. Not much different than the Teabagger mindset here about immigrants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
83. It is not incumbent upon the Swiss to supply "minarets" to the minaret-inclined of the world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #83
87. ^
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC