Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tonight's J. Danforth Quayle Award For Republican Stupidity goes to SEN. JAMES INHOFE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 04:27 PM
Original message
Tonight's J. Danforth Quayle Award For Republican Stupidity goes to SEN. JAMES INHOFE


"People that are really very weird can get into sensitive
positions and have a tremendous impact on history."

J. Danforth Quayle
Vice-President of the United States
1989-1993

Inhofe Trashes Military Generals Who Advocate For Clean Energy Legislation: They Crave ‘The Limelight’

In testimony before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, retired Vice Admiral Dennis McGinn articulated a national security argument for passing clean energy legislation. “Continued over reliance on fossil fuels, or small, incremental steps, simply will not create the kind of future security and prosperity that the American people and our great Nation deserve,” McGinn warned.

In an interview with the New York Times Magazine, Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), the ranking member of the Senate environment committee, argued that McGinn and other generals who are advocating for clean energy reform (like Wesley Clark, Stephen Cheney, Brent Scowcroft, etc) are simply doing so because they crave “the limelight”:

NYT: Senator Boxer is chairwoman of the Environment and Public Works Committee,on which you are the ranking Republican. She and her fellow Democrats have lately suggested that global warming could be a threat to national security by destabilizing developing countries.

INHOFE: That’s the most ludicrous thing. They looked around and they found, I think, five generals to testify before the committee. Well, that’s 5 generals out of 4,000 retired generals that say that. There are a lot of generals who don’t like to be out of the limelight. They’d like to get back in.


The rest http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/29/inhofe-trashes-generals/


The only once seeking "limelight" is this idiot, Inhofe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Inhofe isn't seeking the limelight.
He's just legislating on behalf of his moneyed interests, the planet be damned. Craving attention would be far more forgiveable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think this award ought to go to the morans in OK who keep voting for this idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. How did this asshole get on an environmental commitee?
Edited on Sun Nov-29-09 04:43 PM by onager
Inhofe is a fundamentalist dimbulb who thinks the Rapture is coming day after tomorrow, so we don't NEED to worry about the environment.

As one of his constituents wrote:

Inhofe is one of the least effective senators ever. All he does is spout vitriolic fundamentalist rhetoric, vote the far-right party line, and tour military bases at US expense.

He brags about having run in 1994 on a platform of "God, guns, and gays", and ran the most negative campaigns in Oklahoma's history (and believe me, we are not a shy state).


http://friends.macjournals.com/mattd/inhofedangerousidiot

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC