Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dana Perino, STFU!1 Jeff GANNON *wasn't* "an embarrassing breach of security"?!1

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 12:07 PM
Original message
Dana Perino, STFU!1 Jeff GANNON *wasn't* "an embarrassing breach of security"?!1
The effing ingrate, just days after getting a plum position in the OBAMA administration, she didn't mention that at all but was her usual Rethug self, bashing molehills into mountains.

After she and the others were through, Chris WALLACE turned to Billy "William" KRISTOL and asked for a summary, no doubt expecting tying up the bashfest with a ribbon. The question was ballooned up with references to the balloon boy and other reality t.v. gambits, "What's GOING ON?!1" Incredibly, Billy was low key and magnanimous, probably because he thinks he's going to get his own way in the coming speech on Afghanistan. He shrugged it off, saying, "There have been attention getters for hundreds of years and these are just the current versions." Well, THAT took the air out of PERINO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Security breach? Oh yes I was. Smirk" - Jeff Gannon (R - Hooker)
Edited on Sun Nov-29-09 12:18 PM by SpiralHawk
"But then again, I had the blessing of Wide-Stance Republicon Family Values to shield me from too much public screwtiny about my being the official George AWOL Bush White House Male B & D prostitute. Neener neener neener on your 'socialist-based' security concerns about America. Smirk."

- Jeff Gannon (R - Hooker)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Who was Jeff Gannon visiting in the WH? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. Pretty interesting picture...
...of someone I believe is Jeff Gannon getting a Vulcan liplock from Smirko.



Another time, Bush complemented a Canadian diplomat, saying he had a "pretty face".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. I dont know what's going on there and please dont explain. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Coming from a Bush minion who claims 9/11 and the anthrax attacks didn't happen on W.'s watch,
I don't put much stock in Ms. Perino's statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obviously Obama wanted the 'Airhead' demographic represented when he appointed Perino




Such a collossal dipshit. :eyes:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Obama is an airhead for appointing her. There are a lot of people with differing views he could
have appointed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dana Perino is too dumb to be a revisionist historian......
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. No kidding. That would involving KNOWING something about history
in the first place. lol :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. She is typical of the delusional right wing authoritarian. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. i hope Obama collects soon on whatever deal he cut for hiring Perino...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. What was she hired for? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. It was a bipartisan media panel but I'm sorry, I don't remember its title
or its task.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Can he fire this idiot before she starts?
Edited on Sun Nov-29-09 01:11 PM by HughMoran
She's clearly not taking her new found position seriously - plant a foot in her sorry ass and move on. (or perhaps this is her last flurry before she takes the new position and is forbidden from this sort of activity.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Sorry, that wouldn't be "bipartisan"..
And if you think she's going to stop this kind of crap when she takes her new position you've been quaffing adulterated moonshine.

There will be no consequences for anything Perino says, no matter how stupid or egregious it might be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. She's a fucking smirky little bitch
and a 'plant' is what she is. She'll be reporting directly to Cheney every little crumb of news she might per chance to gather. Fucking smarmy smirky hotshot bitch. No sense of humor. She should be back in the unemployment line with Gonzo. None of the criminal empire should be employed except as garbage collectors. Maybe they will be feeding her counter intelligence to fool ol' Dick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I think we should start a petition to have her nomination withdrawn immediately
She's not playing by the rules and needs to be smacked down hard for her assholery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Maybe Rahm kinda likes her. Just sayin. No link. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. snark
to you too ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. np
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Hmmmmm
Oh Rahm, I wanted you for myself. You big feisty man-beast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. That's what I'm talkin' about!
Yeah, baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. What do you all mean? Dana Perino hired by Obama? Her only
Edited on Sun Nov-29-09 01:15 PM by peacetalksforall
plus is her looks. Sorry to be so blunt. I can't imagine her applying for anything? I can't even envision her being put on a list for anything positive to this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Here is a link...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oh, yeah,
What about the guy? The one who wrote that book? I thought he was such a bad liar. He had to lie for Bush all the time and he must have had a conscience because he squirmed while he spewed bullshit?

What is his name? Dark haired guy kinda has Tom Hank's features?

After Ari and before Dana?


What about him?

I like him way better than her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. Scotty McClellan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #27
34. Quack quack
Edited on Mon Nov-30-09 12:55 AM by Sebastian Doyle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #27
35. Yes, him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
18. Right, just like there were no terrorist attacks on *'s watch...
"I don't know all of their thinking that goes into it, but we did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush's term. I hope that their not looking into this politically."
-Dana Perino
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. That's because she probably knows that bush* old family friends attacked the WTC.
The Saudi royal family and the bin Ladin's are close family friends of the bush crime family. They can hardly be called terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. OMG
I think you guessed it. We junior psychics need to be careful when we expose National Security breaks with our wild guesses. Careful now the men in black will be showing up to recruit you for psych-ops-remote-viewing. When you are right, you're right. :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. phych-ops-remote-viewing? I think I did that in the '60's. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snarkoleptic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
28. I always assumed that Gannon was give the OK to enter via the back-door.
No interloper he.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. You are terrible. But who was his host? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
33. Well, I mean how *could* Gannon be thus with a 'back door (ahem) pass' to the bush WH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC