Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Paint-Less Coca-Cola Would Save Earth One Can at a Time

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:29 AM
Original message
The Paint-Less Coca-Cola Would Save Earth One Can at a Time
Edited on Sun Nov-29-09 07:34 AM by Are_grits_groceries

It doesn't only look beautiful, and it would make Jon Ive and Steve Jobs wet, but this naked Coca-Cola can would help save energy while reducing air and water pollution. Would it really make a difference? Let's do some math:

I assume the consumption only increases through time, but let's take the daily 2007 numbers from Global INForM Cases Sales database: The total number of Coca-Cola cans sold per worldwide is 67,873,309. Diet Coke and Coke Zero sold 35,387,241, while My Coke sold 103,260,550. Yes, that's all per day.

So using only classic Coca-Cola's daily sales figures, that means 24,773,757,785 are sold every year. Twenty-four billion cans. That is indeed a lot of paint and paint removal products. Because this doesn't only affect the production. It also affects the recycling process, eliminating one step:

The naked can help to reduce air and water pollution occurred in its coloring process. It also reduces energy and effort to separate toxic color paint from aluminum in recycling process. Huge amount of energy and paint required to manufacture colored cans will be saved. Instead of toxic paint, manufacturers process aluminum with a pressing machine that indicates brand identity on surface.

Sounds good to me, and it even looks better if you take into account all kinds of Coke. That brings up the number to 75,380,201,500 cans. I don't know how much paint that represents, but I'm guessing quite a few thousand tons. <7760 via Likecool, Sales info from Let's Get Together>

http://gizmodo.com/5408251/the-paint+less-coca+cola-would-save-earth-one-can-at-a-time

Interesting idea with some kinks to be worked out. That can is a cool look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. I've wondered why no beverage company has done this. It's bottom line cutting with PR benefits on
top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Two reasons I can think of...
The most important reason: a UPC barcode that's not printed on the can wouldn't scan. It would also be rough to do a legible list of ingredients and Nutrition Facts statement without print.

The other? Coca-Cola's corporate color is red.

Not sure about the bottom line benefits; they'd save money on paint but spend it on debossing the can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Three or four square inches could take care of that. It'd use up about 95% less paint. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Looks good and washes down the Maker's Mark better than Pepsi. n/t
:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. how many people will that put out of
work, and where?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. OH NO!! It will end my career as a certified Aluminum Can Paint Stripper!!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jester Messiah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. It'll put a fine crew of robots out of a job, for sure!
However, there are those who maintain those robots, and those employed in the production of those robots (or factory painting gear, whatever), as well as those involved in creating the paint. Economies of scale and all that.

Still, the "naked" can is damn cool, and the paint can be used on other products. I'm all for it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #18
32. I did not say I was not for it
I just like to think about things that others might not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meeker Morgan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. More empty posturing that saves nothing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Kind of like your post? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meeker Morgan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
27. Because proving your heart is pure is the important thing, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. It may save coke money on the paint
leaving them more profit per can. Other than that the nonsense about the paint removal is just that...as if every aluminum maker is going to quit painting their containers, or that somehow there is savings in sorting out the coke cans from the depainting process...they will still go through the depainting process just like the zillions of other cans will..much ado about a merchandising scheme, and many suckers who will buy into the scheme..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. Cool looking can
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe if we people stopped drinking Coke, it would save even more of the planet.
All the water saved, for one thing.

74 billion cans a day.....I am flabbergasted. Coke sells for what? 1.00 a can?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. US$ 1.20 minimum here. Most often, US$ 1.40. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lagomorph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. They'd still drink the water...
which, in many places is kinda yucky.

I drink caf-free diet coke.

I hope my can looks cooler than regular coke so I pick the right one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Caf-free diet coke?
You DO already drink kinda yucky water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lagomorph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
34. I like the taste.
The tap water in Marysville/Yuba City, CA not so much.

In my part of the world, water only needs to be filtered (if even that) and it tastes good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. That is just brown water with fizz added.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jester Messiah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. Cease your blasphemy.
You'll be having a go at coffee next... and life without coffee is a joyless existence in which I refuse to participate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabbycat31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
26. I gave up soda 3 years ago
occasionally I crave a sip of it (usually when I am around my soda drinking parents) and that satisfys it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
31. Ding! DING! DING! EXACTLY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lagomorph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Nihilist!
OK, that's it! Give up soda? Come and take it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
15. I drink the stuff maybe once every two or three years. But this is a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
16. The only downside is that it comes from Coca Cola.
Edited on Sun Nov-29-09 08:47 AM by JoeyT
I tend to take anything from Coca Cola corporation with a big grain of salt.
If they're doing anything that's good for someone, it's only because they figured out it was cheaper.
Which is still a refreshing change from all the horrific things they do because they're cheaper.

Hey Coke, gonna stop being in the top twenty companies in the world for worker abuse? Didn't think so.

Edited to add: Recced because it's still a really cool idea, even if it is Coca Cola doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
17. It's fine for all the vision-impaired soda drinkers but everyone else will probable switch to some
other beverage. They need the color logo printed on the cans in order to sell the shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. I would have thought so until I saw the can.
That will stand out loudly compared to all the others. Imagine standing back from a display case where all varieties are marketed. That would catch your eye first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
21. So are they going to cut the prices?
Edited on Sun Nov-29-09 09:32 AM by Taitertots
Just a big hustle to increase profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
22. That is one sexy can
My re-use/recycle imaginator button just got turned on. They could be used as shells for speakers. Slice the top off and file down the rough edges and have some sweet pen holders or drinking cups or planters or...

Oh, and it's nice that the professional recyclers would save a step as well.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
23. Cool... the blind can now choose Coke over Pepsi,
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endless october Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
24. just imagine what a return to glass bottles would do.
can be washed and re-used.

i'm not a fan of plastic bottles. instant landfill waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. cans are more enviro-friendly
1. less weight to transport when full to the stores and when empty to the recycler
2. 99.99% of an aluminium can can be reused over and over and over
3. if they do end up in a landfill, cans can be flattened to take up less room
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
29. This is a beautiful design concept by Ryan+Harc (NY-based industrial designers).
Not sure how functional it is, or whether Coca-Cola would be willing to toss the branded Coca-Cola red out the window, but it's intriguing.

Here's the design firm responsible for the unibody Coca-Cola can concept: http://www.7760.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
30. Those look cool.
Very futuristic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PHIMG Donating Member (814 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
33. they do doubt conclude it will negatively impact sales
and therefore dismiss it. just like the cigarette companies and some of their cancer causing additives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC