|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:32 AM Original message |
Senator Ralph Nader of Connecticut? Maybe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katkat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
1. who knew, someone worse than LIEberman n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:38 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Shirley, you must be joking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 11:16 AM Response to Reply #1 |
19. not true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 02:07 PM Response to Reply #1 |
45. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 03:59 PM Response to Reply #45 |
57. What do you base that assumption on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 01:12 AM Response to Reply #57 |
94. I don't even know why anyone would bother responding to such. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 08:42 AM Response to Reply #57 |
103. Wow, Dennis Kucinich believes in al that, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 08:39 PM Response to Reply #103 |
110. You are on crack if you think Kucinich always votes with Republicans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-30-09 11:35 AM Response to Reply #110 |
113. HE does on the big votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-30-09 11:46 AM Response to Reply #103 |
114. Kucinich voting record... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 06:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
77. To a Republican, sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-30-09 01:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
117. _ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
2. His new novel is great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 11:17 AM Response to Reply #2 |
20. i really need to pick it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
4. If there's anything he can do to put a repuke in office... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
5. Let's see if Nader can be a spoiler in Connecticut like he did in Florida /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 11:20 AM Response to Reply #5 |
23. down with Democracy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 04:06 AM Response to Reply #23 |
99. I didn't say he couldn't, I just said the most he could accomplish is being a spoiler, because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 05:15 PM Response to Reply #99 |
108. if given a choice, i don't like it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 08:29 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. When Ralph said there was not much difference between both parties, there was a basic truth in that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swilton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 05:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
69. The Democratic Party Lost Florida |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 06:51 PM Response to Reply #69 |
79. It was stolen in Florida. Without outright fraud Gore would have won hands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 04:03 AM Response to Reply #79 |
97. Gore had the wrong advice. All he had to do was recount the WHOLE state, and that would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 04:04 AM Response to Reply #69 |
98. Knowing what I know now, and based on his choice of lieberman, I would NOT support Gore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
6. Better hope not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
7. not a chance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogmudgeon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
8. That's it. I'm going on the wagon. No more crack for me! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
9. It would be better to challenge Lieberman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 12:19 PM Response to Reply #9 |
32. Yeah, but Ralph's already pretty old and it's going to be awhile before ol' Joementum comes up for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
10. Why do alot of people on DU blame Nader for Gore's loss? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WilliamPitt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:49 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. *munch munch* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 11:06 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. I wanted to make sure this got kicked til midnight tonight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:50 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. And why do people deny it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Umbral (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:52 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Because it's easier than admitting the truth. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xipe Totec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 11:57 AM Response to Reply #13 |
28. And what is the truth? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 12:29 PM Response to Reply #28 |
35. That the Dems started veering to the right in the 90's giving Nader the opening he took. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 01:00 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. nicely said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xipe Totec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 06:34 PM Response to Reply #40 |
74. Nader can expect the same kind of support that he gave |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:26 PM Response to Reply #74 |
89. And how did that work out for the Dems? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xipe Totec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 02:50 PM Response to Reply #35 |
46. Enjoy Nader's Pyhrric victory then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:25 PM Response to Reply #46 |
88. Look up...the point is sailing over your head. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoSheep (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 01:13 AM Response to Reply #46 |
95. Your sig line seems to support Nader absolutely! I'm always blown away by that shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 03:15 PM Response to Reply #35 |
51. Well said, Forkboy!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xipe Totec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 06:32 PM Response to Reply #51 |
73. Look at the outcome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:27 PM Response to Reply #73 |
90. Yout attitude is what brought us to where we are today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 04:02 PM Response to Reply #35 |
60. That was definitely a big part of the problems in 2000. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xipe Totec (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 06:42 PM Response to Reply #60 |
75. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:45 PM Response to Reply #75 |
91. Yes, really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:58 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Legal - yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 11:05 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Your notion is absurd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 11:08 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. The only thing that was absurd was your incoherant rant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 11:13 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Lovely, what's next? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HERVEPA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 11:18 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Can Do (and well deserved) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 11:22 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Channeling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 11:18 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. yes, and Nader forced people to vote against their own will, at gun point! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 03:33 PM Response to Reply #21 |
54. the hits just keep on coming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 12:01 PM Response to Reply #15 |
29. It is simple mathematics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 12:15 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. I thought Bush stole the election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 12:51 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. There were serious problems in Florida |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 12:55 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. I guess all the purging of African American voters was normal too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 03:04 PM Response to Reply #39 |
49. Normaly doesn't mean good - but unfortunately yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 05:28 PM Response to Reply #39 |
71. The voter purges were in the Florida newspapers before the election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flaneur (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 03:55 PM Response to Reply #31 |
56. I thought a bunch of Democrats and independents voted for Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 12:49 PM Response to Reply #15 |
37. I think what I believed about it at the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 04:10 PM Response to Reply #37 |
63. it's not even about Florida though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BreweryYardRat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 06:46 PM Response to Reply #15 |
76. The thing is, the election wouldn't have been close enough for Bush to steal if Nader hadn't run. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 11:42 AM Response to Reply #14 |
27. From where Nader stands, Gore and Bush probably were similiar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 06:55 PM Response to Reply #27 |
83. They look quite similar from where I stand as well. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 06:53 PM Response to Reply #14 |
81. What excuses do you make for the 300,000 Democratic Floridians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 07:16 PM Response to Reply #81 |
85. My problem is with Nader choosing to compete against Gore, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 11:12 PM Response to Reply #85 |
92. nader's run in 2000 as the only democratic thing about that whole election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ms. Toad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 01:08 AM Response to Reply #92 |
93. There were only two realistic possible outcomes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Luminous Animal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 04:17 AM Response to Reply #93 |
100. I take responsibility for being a Green Party member |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 03:54 PM Response to Reply #92 |
105. Well said! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-30-09 02:49 PM Response to Reply #92 |
118. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ipaint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 11:36 AM Response to Reply #10 |
26. The two parties we have don't like anyone horning in on their action. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 01:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
41. Cuz only Truth and Sunshine come from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 02:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
44. It's also still legal to accurately assess cause and effect isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 03:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
48. Because everybody left of center with a brain should've supported Gore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 03:16 PM Response to Reply #10 |
52. that is such a dumb argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 04:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
59. Not to mention, GORE WON!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 06:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
82. Scapegoating. They don't want to look like a conspiracy theorist by accepting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
25. He's getting too old to play these games |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 04:06 PM Response to Reply #25 |
61. That was my thought, too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
natrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
30. hmm dodd's a scumbag ,nader's a scumbag they are all kind of scummy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
33. We don't need anymore "aged" senators.. Old-thinking is what's been killing us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katkat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 05:14 PM Response to Reply #33 |
68. SoCalDem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
34. At least he doesn't have to pack any carpet bags and move there in order to run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
safeinOhio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
36. Point being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
42. Oh sure, he wants to run against the LIBERAL senator and not Fuckwad Loserman! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 03:38 PM Response to Reply #42 |
55. Someone did run against Loserman. And the Democrats in power backed Loserman when he went |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intheflow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 04:09 PM Response to Reply #42 |
62. Dodd is also pretty bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
43. I hope he does it and wins. It would be a good way for him to make himself useful. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
47. I'd like to see Nader in the Senate, actually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katkat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 05:17 PM Response to Reply #47 |
70. Sebastion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 05:29 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. Bernie Sanders has limits to what he will compromise on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katkat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 06:31 AM Response to Reply #72 |
101. Good for Bernie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patrice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
50. I am for this. Great stage for Nader's voice on the issues!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
53. freshman senator at age 76? no thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katkat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 06:35 AM Response to Reply #53 |
102. 76 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 03:20 PM Response to Reply #102 |
104. who said anything about guarantees? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katkat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-30-09 11:34 AM Response to Reply #104 |
112. age |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-30-09 01:12 PM Response to Reply #112 |
116. hmm, i don't want a certain 76-year old representing me, therefore i want to ban hiring 40-year olds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
58. Ralph should have had this little baby step idea, oh, I dunno, maybe 11-12 years ago? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
64. It's a free country. Chris Dodd brought a lot of this on himself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 04:37 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. bye bye Dodd = |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
65. say hello to Senator Simmons :( |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downtown Hound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
67. Great! Looks like Connecticut can have another Republican whore masquerading as a progressive! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 06:49 PM Response to Reply #67 |
78. Maybe democrats could try and outflank him by being more progressive than him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 07:07 PM Response to Reply #78 |
84. THAT would be much more constructive than acting like politicians are entitled to their jobs without |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downtown Hound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 07:22 PM Response to Reply #78 |
86. As far as I'm concerned, most of them already are. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 07:30 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. LOL Nice one. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fading Captain (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 01:18 AM Response to Reply #67 |
96. Dittocrats sucks balls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Downtown Hound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 03:56 PM Response to Reply #96 |
107. "Dittocrats suck balls." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mattclearing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
80. Wish he'd done this 40 years ago. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 03:56 PM Response to Original message |
106. That'd be cool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-29-09 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
111. I guess you can teach an old dog new tricks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-30-09 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
115. Great! If Nader runs against Dodd he will guarantee Dodd's defeat and another GOP Senator. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC