Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin and Cheney are a joke, who's the REAL threat????

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DaveinJapan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 07:33 AM
Original message
Palin and Cheney are a joke, who's the REAL threat????
Okay, so Palin and Cheney have been bandied about by the extremist right wingers as potential "candidates" for President, but it's not going to happen.

They are both partisan caricatures loathed by the majority of Americans, with approval ratings in the toilet.

I will say this much, if either of them ever became Presdent, that'd be the day I march down to city hall and start the process of becoming a citizen of Japan (and if they won't have me, I'll find some other country somehow), and beyond that I wouldn't even set foot in America. I can meet up with friends and family for get togethers in Canada, that'd do just fine.

BUT, that's not the purpose of this little diatribe, because I'm confident that won't happen. What DOES concern me is, which right wing wingnut MIGHT become a media darling and a real threat to take over the White House in the near future?

Who has the charisma and the guts to turn around the Bush cesspool and gain power in 12, 16 or 20?

I want to start keeping an eye on such folks, and doing all I can to make sure we don't go down that path yet again (I regret I didn't work harder than I did to stop it in 00 and 04, as I'm sure many DUers feel, but in any case I don't want to make the same error twice!).

Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. huckabee
though I want to say that joke or not, Palin could, under certain circumstances, make it to the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rubberducky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I agree with you. The repubbies like stupid, they proved that with W.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. "D'oh. They like chickenhawks, too. Smirk." - George aWol Bush (R)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'd enjoy watching about a dozen ego-maniac Republicans rip each
other to bits for the nomination so fiercely that the nomination won't be worth having no matter who emerges.

My fear is that Huckabee trains his charm and folksiness onto the FOX News voter.

Sarah Palin and Michael Bloomberg could become very interesting variables in the 2012 race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Pat Boone
Edited on Sat Nov-28-09 07:49 AM by Hubert Flottz
Pick almost any republican that you or I could ever name and you'd have the same old lying POS!

GOP = No Good!

Edit Maybe Arnold(the Groppen Fuhrer of KolleyFourKneeya)He's a multilingual liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadicalGeek Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Why are we leaving out
Michelle Bachman.
Of course the real threats from the GOP we need to look at are Beck, Limbaugh, etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ineeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Ahnold is ineligible...
Born in Austria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. The Birthers have been laying the groundwork to making that
case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
9. It seems like Huckabee is being groomed.
He has to be "moderat-ized", but he's got the "folksy" quality they like so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fl_dem Donating Member (444 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
10. I've heard Joe Scarborough's name thrown around for 2012.
I think all potential GOP candidates must have to pass the purity test first. If they insist on talking the talk like all good christian rightwingers do, then they should be held accountable to walk the walk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. Pawlenty
Smarmily charming enough to fool a liberal state twice, and hides his batshit crazy Xian fundy side better than Huckabee while still sending out the right signals to the true believers in the American Taliban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hermetic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
12. Tim Pawlenty
(POS) Gov of Minnesota , has his hat in the ring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinJapan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
13. I agree, Pawlenty makes me very nervous.
Huckabee is WAY too crazy on the religious front, imho.

Pawlenty though, yeah. He's a big concern of mine.

Still though, I don't see that much charisma from the guy. Kinda reminds me of John Kerry to be honest (well, he has more charisma than Kerry, but not much more).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I don't think asshat Timmy has any charisma at all.
Plus he looks like a charlatan, with his beady little crossed eyes. And he's a wimp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
704wipes Donating Member (966 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
32. Isn't Mark Dayton running for gov against Pawlenty?
Is that next year, 2010?

So Pawlenty would be available for 2 years of campaigning, if he lost that race,
but wouldn't he be damaged goods having just lost the governorship?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 10:45 AM
Original message
Pawlenty is not seeking reelection because he knows he would be vulnerable if he did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
14. The Predator
Edited on Sat Nov-28-09 08:37 AM by MannyGoldstein
Mitt "Now the entire US will have the crazy-assed health care plan I designed, suckers!!!" Romney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
15. No way @ Huckabee. Too rightwing & radical. I think Romney. But Palin is a huge possibility. Plan4it
Edited on Sat Nov-28-09 08:40 AM by Shagbark Hickory
This country is mostly conservative but centrist for the most part.
Huckabee is way on the right. He's also has radical fantasies of doing away with the IRS. That's an immediate deal-breaker for the centrist conservatives and swing voters who would seem to be very against anything that messes with the status quo.

I would not cast aside Palin. Just think about what people would have said about Obama's chances in 2005, and he's an educated very smart man who reads.

I would however cast aside Cheney. There's not a chance in hell and if there was there'd be a mass exodus like you see in a Hollywood movie when an asteroid is about to hit Los Angeles.

I think the real contender is not in the spot light yet. Probably a woman, because the republicans will try to score some votes that way even though they feel a woman's place is in the Kitchen.
OF those that are in the spotlight, I'd say it's Romney. He appeals to the fiscal conservatives and he got elected governor in blue territory. That's a proven track record already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. nope. disagree. romney has very little support among the base
huckabee has a lot of appeal and articulates very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. That's my point. The base isn't the decider. It's the middle of the road swingers.
That rules out the ultra right wingers just the same as it rules out the Kucinichs and Gravels.
His going on record saying he would end the IRS is soviet fascism that will not, no matter how many fairtax bumper stickers you see, will not survive the attack ads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Palin's already trying out her slogan of "common sense conservatism".
Reminds me of the BS "compassionate conservatism" that * tried and "thousand points of light" his father rolled out.

I feel like we're being treated like consumers with Madison Avenue trying out new products.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. We need to be very very concerned with the Possibility of Palin/Obama in 2012. That simple. Rockstar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Codger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #18
33. Bingo n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TicketyBoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
19. I think they'd better get their act together
because I can't see any of the above as President. They're going to have to pull a hat-trick to find anybody worth running, at least in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
22. Two names to remember
Diebold and ES&S.

They are in position to make or break any run at the president.

In fact, they got Bush selected in 2004.

If you are really interested in the future you will get to know those names and their background as well as you can, and see how they operate in your state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Only one name to remember.
ES&S bought Diebold recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Heh
Glad to see someone else paying attention!! Actually, it was Premier that ES&S is buying.

Did you know that in Allentown Pa they still use machines with NO paper!
And some folks there never had a clue? Sad, init?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Yes, Premier Election Solutions.
(The new name of the former elections division of Diebold.)

The most trusted name in vote rigging!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
25. Danny Bonaduce
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanshatingbush Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
26. What about a Blue Dog crossover to the Pukes?
It would have to be someone, I'm guessing, with good "visuals", apparent sincerity, ability to evoke down-home likability, apparent "I'm for what's right, not what's political", a lot of financial backing, and loved by the handful of Neocons who are the real power behind the Puke throne (currently a commode). Probably also someone of Palin's generation.

Who fits that bill?

Don't know enuf about him to be able to judge--but what about Evan Bayh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Ackety, you may be correct.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
704wipes Donating Member (966 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #26
35. I was afraid someone might say his name
He has a 13 mill$ war chest right now. I do know he has backers in NH too, but those were dems, not sure if Blue Dogs or not. He has a primary challenger for the senate seat this next year. A female restaurant owner in Bloomington as I understand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
28. Well...
Cut my legs off and call me shorty!

Who would have guessed that Joe was a total Zellout?(probably about 99.9% of everyone who knows anything at all about Joey the smoooooch. Munching GOPer Butt is what Joey lives for now that Karl is his soul owner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cowcommander Donating Member (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
30. Texas Gov. Rick Perry
I've seen his name mentioned many times already, and with Texas doing fairly well financially right now, he can ride on that popular sentiment if the economy gets worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
31. Mitch McConnell--and I'm not kidding.

Watch the positioning as he deals with everything the administration attempts to do. No charisma, but a lot of clout among Repubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftFist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
34. They should default on the 2012 election
And take more time to regroup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #34
42. It's early days yet but that looks like a real possibility at this point. Like in '96...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #34
47. That's what I was thinking, which is why Palin gets the press: disposable. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
36. Romney, if he can survive the primaries
Palin is a joke, Cheney has no chance, and Huckabee will do what he did in 2008 - play the fundie-spoiler for any so-called "serious" GOP candidates who are not beloved by the GOP base. Huckabee killed Giuliani and Romney in '08 by sucking up the base votes and preventing them from getting over the top. He'll do it again, and likely deliver another weakened candidate like McCain.

But a lot of Republicans I talk to are pinning all their hopes on Romney. I think it's a reach; the GOP base thinks Mormonism is a cult, and won't support him because of that. But Romney's financial resources are huge, and he will get gobs of dough from Republicans who don't want the crazy base to pick the candidate. He's the GOPs best shot next time, in my humble O.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftFist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. That's because....
Mormonism is a cult. But your right, a christian evangelical party will most likely NOT want a mormon as their christian evangelical front-man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Money makes a lot of difference
If he can outspend his opponents, he has a chance, but the primaries will be a hell-march for him in the south and west.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Codger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
37. The repug
Candidate choice is going to rely heavily on 2010 midterms and Obama's ratings after that... if he has good ratings they will run a loser like they did with Dole as a gift to allow someone to say they ran, if he is down a lot they will pick a stronger candidate who has an actual chance to win. None of them wants to run and have a loss in their column ruining a re-try later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
38. If Palin's a joke, you wouldn't know it from the obsession with her on here. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. It's the train wreck -- we don't want to look but then can't stop.
Same thing with Orly Taitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
43. I won't discount Jeb Crow Shrub until the B.F.E.E. has a stake through its bones!1
I realize that the consensus is that Shrub "damaged the brand" so badly that JebCrow is out, but the Rethugs will always hope that THIS one has always been the best of the lot (for them), smarter, speaks Spanish well, has a better record (from their POV) than Shrub ever did, etc., etc.

And I tremble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. 2016. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katanalori Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
44. Jeb Bush n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
45. I think Jim DeMInt (SC) is positioning himself for a run.
If he gets it, prepare to get the hell out of Dodge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-28-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
46. They need a Reagan -- but I don't think there is one
Reagan had several advantages as of 1978.

He was older -- born in 1911 -- and still had some of that Greatest Generation air of integrity about him. But there's no benefit right now to being a 67 year old Republican.

He had a significant power base in California, involving the wealthy conservatives who later became his Kitchen Cabinet. I don't know of any equivalent base currently, either in terms of money or in terms of ideology, except on the extreme religious right.

He spent the years after his failed bid for the nomination in 1976 raising money for other Republican candidates and thus had a lot of favors to call in come 1980. I don't see anyone like that currently -- Palin, for example, seems to be entirely out for herself.

He had a folksy charm that made people overlook the hard-core ideology at the central of his policies. Huckabee may have the folksiness but it's a lot thinner than Reagan's was.

People have fretted a lot over how hard it has been over the last 40 years for Democrats to win the presidency -- but it hasn't been all that easy for Republicans, either. Nixon won because the upheavals of 1968 freaked a lot of people out and because the Democrats were self-destructing. Reagan won by running against Carter's preachings of malaise and pushing unfounded optimism. But during that same period, two Republican incumbents -- Ford and Bush I -- lost their bids for reelection.

So basically, the GOP seems to have only two pathways to possible success in 2012. One would be if Obama fucks up so totally that people are eager for any alternative. They're doing that best to make that happen but at this point I can't quite see them bringing it off.

The other would be to find an equivalent of Bush II -- someone who can pass as moderate but sends out the right signals to the base -- and do the necessary stealing, manipulating, calling on unlimited floods of corporate money (especially if the Supreme Court allows that in the Citizens United case), and demonizing of ACORN to eke out a razor-thin majority.

The second scenario seems a lot more likely at this point. Especially if the country is even more bitterly divided by then, the GOP might score points by bringing in a "uniter" candidate who can paint Obama as hopelessly partisan and himself or herself as above the fray while the operatives do the dirty work behind the scenes.

Of the names mentioned in the course of this thread, Pawlenty might be closest to fitting that model. Probably the best strategy for the Democrats at this point is to be alert for any significant movement of established GOP operatives and/or money people towards Pawlenty or any other "moderate" and counter it by deploying wedge issues to force those people to either go against the rabid right base or fall too closely into its embrace.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC